19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

are appropriate and do not contain any quality measures<br />

specifically addressing multiple, co-morbid conditions. A<br />

few comments urged <strong>CMS</strong> to adopt quality measures that would<br />

enable the full range of physicians to participate and to<br />

identify and add more quality measures to fill the gaps.<br />

The commenters also requested that we consider developing<br />

interim opportunities for eligible professionals for whom<br />

there is a shortage of available measures to participate in<br />

the PQRI and to receive an incentive for doing so. One<br />

comment urged funding for consumer-relevant measure<br />

development to fill the existing gaps and to include<br />

language in the measure development contracts that reflects<br />

the perspectives of consumers and purc<strong>has</strong>ers. Another<br />

commenter urged us to include more measures on which<br />

specifications for electronic data submission via EHRs are<br />

available.<br />

Response: Health care quality measures are currently<br />

developed by a variety of organizations and used by a<br />

variety of governmental and nongovernmental, and public-<br />

private initiatives which have various and at times<br />

differing priorities and programmatic needs for quality<br />

measures. As reflected by the considerations for<br />

identifying proposed PQRI quality measures described in the<br />

CY 2009 PFS proposed rule (73 FR 38566), we are committed<br />

601

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!