Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

CMS-1403-FC
Comment: Several comments expressed concerns about
the AQA’s structure and original intended purpose not being
ideally suited to its current role in PQRI, and its role in
the measure endorsement process not clearly adding value to
the process. Many comments noted that the AQA does not
meet the NTTAA definition of a “voluntary consensus
standards body.”
Response: Both the NQF and the AQA were identified as
examples of consensus organizations under section
1848(k)(2)(B)(i) of the Act. We interpreted this to mean
that for purposes of the PQRI, these organizations, as
constituted on the date of enactment of the MIEA-THRCA
authorizing legislation, are considered to be consensus
organizations. On the other hand we stated that we found
the NQF to be an organization organized and operating in a
manner that meets the NTTAA definition of a “voluntary
consensus standards body,” but we did not find that the AQA
constituted such an organization. We also stated our
policy preference for measures endorsed by an organization
that meets the NTTAA definition of “voluntary consensus
standards body” to one that does not so qualify. Further,
we stated our policy that a measure that was specifically
declined for endorsement by the NQF would not be included
in PQRI even though it was adopted by AQA.
597