Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC submitted by a specialty to apply to each measure. Rather, we believe this requirement means that in endorsing or adopting measures, a consensus organization must include in its consideration process at least some measures submitted by one physician or organization representing a particular specialty. We also believe that under sections 1848(k)(2)(B)(ii) through (iii) of the Act, the Secretary is given broad discretion to determine which quality measures meet the statutory requirements and are appropriate for inclusion in the final set of measures for 2009. We do not interpret section 1848(k)(2)(B) of the Act to require that all measures that meet the basic requirements of section 1848(k)(2)(B)(i) of the Act be included in the 2009 set of quality measures. The statutory requirements for consensus organizations and the use of a consensus-based process for developing quality measures as they relate to the requirements for the 2009 PQRI measures were discussed in the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule (73 FR 38565 through 38566). As discussed in the proposed rule, consistent with the principle that measures used for 2009 be endorsed or adopted by a consensus organization and developed through the use of a consensus-based process, but without limiting the 2009 PQRI measures to those meeting the definition of a 594
CMS-1403-FC voluntary consensus standard under the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-113) (NTTAA), we interpret “consensus-based process for developing measures” as used in section 1848(k) of the Act to encompass not only the basic development work of the formal measure developer, but also to include the achievement of consensus among stakeholders in the health care system. In addition, section 1848(k)(2)(D) of the Act, as added by the MIPPA, requires that for each 2009 PQRI quality measure, “the Secretary shall ensure that eligible professionals have the opportunity to provide input during the development, endorsement, or selection of measures applicable to services they furnish.” Eligible professionals have the opportunity to provide input during the development of a measure during the public comment phase of a measure’s development. As part of the measure development process, measure developers typically solicit public comments on measures that they are testing in order to determine whether additional refinement of the measure(s) is needed prior to submission for consensus endorsement. Additional information on the measure development process used by CMS contractors is available in the “Quality Measures Development Overview” document found 595
- Page 543 and 544: CMS-1403-FC requested that more det
- Page 545 and 546: CMS-1403-FC incentive payments for
- Page 547 and 548: CMS-1403-FC December 31, 2009 and J
- Page 549 and 550: CMS-1403-FC the reporting period fo
- Page 551 and 552: CMS-1403-FC proposed to carry forwa
- Page 553 and 554: CMS-1403-FC measures group is appli
- Page 555 and 556: CMS-1403-FC measures results and nu
- Page 557 and 558: CMS-1403-FC (Delmarva Foundation fo
- Page 559 and 560: CMS-1403-FC registries to report on
- Page 561 and 562: CMS-1403-FC reporting options for r
- Page 563 and 564: CMS-1403-FC incentive payment for P
- Page 565 and 566: CMS-1403-FC to report 2009 PQRI qua
- Page 567 and 568: CMS-1403-FC Comment: We received nu
- Page 569 and 570: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One comment su
- Page 571 and 572: CMS-1403-FC quality measures result
- Page 573 and 574: CMS-1403-FC requirements listed on
- Page 575 and 576: CMS-1403-FC a data submission vendo
- Page 577 and 578: CMS-1403-FC As we stated in the CY
- Page 579 and 580: CMS-1403-FC whether eligible profes
- Page 581 and 582: CMS-1403-FC ● Agree that the regi
- Page 583 and 584: CMS-1403-FC soon thereafter as is t
- Page 585 and 586: CMS-1403-FC Comment: We received ma
- Page 587 and 588: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One commenter
- Page 589 and 590: CMS-1403-FC additional 2.0 percent
- Page 591 and 592: CMS-1403-FC EHRs in 2009. The measu
- Page 593: CMS-1403-FC i. Overview and Summary
- Page 597 and 598: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 599 and 600: CMS-1403-FC the AMA-PCPI should be
- Page 601 and 602: CMS-1403-FC are appropriate and do
- Page 603 and 604: CMS-1403-FC to make any changes to
- Page 605 and 606: CMS-1403-FC post the measures for p
- Page 607 and 608: CMS-1403-FC beneficiaries. We now h
- Page 609 and 610: CMS-1403-FC identified in Tables 15
- Page 611 and 612: CMS-1403-FC important difference in
- Page 613 and 614: CMS-1403-FC not use Measures #73 Ca
- Page 615 and 616: CMS-1403-FC measures, but which are
- Page 617 and 618: CMS-1403-FC with comment period. Ho
- Page 619 and 620: CMS-1403-FC ● Measure #41 Osteopo
- Page 621 and 622: CMS-1403-FC professional to simply
- Page 623 and 624: CMS-1403-FC measures. We consider t
- Page 625 and 626: CMS-1403-FC Measure Number and Titl
- Page 627 and 628: CMS-1403-FC Measure Number and Titl
- Page 629 and 630: CMS-1403-FC ● Measure #120 CKD: A
- Page 631 and 632: CMS-1403-FC For the 2009 PQRI quali
- Page 633 and 634: CMS-1403-FC rule indicated that the
- Page 635 and 636: CMS-1403-FC Response: As suggested
- Page 637 and 638: CMS-1403-FC required for the measur
- Page 639 and 640: CMS-1403-FC ● Achievement of NQF
- Page 641 and 642: CMS-1403-FC These additional measur
- Page 643 and 644: CMS-1403-FC We did not include this
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
<strong>submitted</strong> by a specialty to apply to each measure. Rather,<br />
we believe this requirement means that in endorsing or<br />
adopting measures, a consensus organization must include in<br />
its consideration process at least some measures <strong>submitted</strong><br />
by one physician or organization representing a particular<br />
specialty.<br />
We also believe that under sections 1848(k)(2)(B)(ii)<br />
through (iii) of the Act, the Secretary is given broad<br />
discretion to determine which quality measures meet the<br />
statutory requirements and are appropriate for inclusion in<br />
the final set of measures for 2009. We do not interpret<br />
section 1848(k)(2)(B) of the Act to require that all<br />
measures that meet the basic requirements of section<br />
1848(k)(2)(B)(i) of the Act be included in the 2009 set of<br />
quality measures. The statutory requirements for consensus<br />
organizations and the use of a consensus-based process for<br />
developing quality measures as they relate to the<br />
requirements for the 2009 PQRI measures were discussed in<br />
the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule (73 FR 38565 through 38566).<br />
As discussed in the proposed rule, consistent with the<br />
principle that measures used for 2009 be endorsed or<br />
adopted by a consensus organization and developed through<br />
the use of a consensus-based process, but without limiting<br />
the 2009 PQRI measures to those meeting the definition of a<br />
594