Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC Comment: We received one comment requesting eligible professionals with only 1 or 2 measures to be able to report via registries. Response: We did not propose to allow registry reporting of 1 or 2 measures if less than 3 measures apply. Analytically it would be difficult to implement in that if an eligible professional submits fewer than 3 measures via registries we would not know whether the eligible professional did so because only 2 measures applied or because the registry only accepts data for 2 of the provider’s measures and he or she is reporting their third measure via claims. The amount of cross-checking via different submission options that would be necessary makes it impractical to implement the commenter’s suggestion. Comment: A few comments were received regarding the process for correcting data that was sent in via registries that is incorrect. Response: We highly discourage eligible professionals from changing data once it is submitted to CMS from the registry. Allowing data to be resubmitted for one or more professionals would not only be time-consuming and delay reports and payment, but it could also result in duplicating or erroneously leaving out some professionals’ 570

CMS-1403-FC quality measures results and/or numerator and denominator data on quality measures. Comment: Two commenters requested that we specify what constituted an acceptable validation strategy for registries. Response: As a result of the MMSEA, which was enacted in December, 2007, and modified the PQRI, we implemented registry-based submission for the 2008 PQRI. Thus, for 2008, we required registry vendors to supply CMS with their validation strategy that would detail how the registry would ensure that the data the registry reported to CMS was accurate. We found that there are several variations for this process that registries use. We do not believe we have enough experience with registries to specify a single validation strategy that all should employ and we believe we are benefited from allowing a variety of such techniques to be employed based on our approval at this point. Therefore, for the 2009 PQRI, registry vendors will again be required to supply us with their validation strategy that details how the registry would ensure that the data the registry reports to us is accurate. In addition, we note that registries are required to sign an attestation statement to CMS vouching for the accuracy of the data that 571

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

quality measures results and/or numerator and denominator<br />

data on quality measures.<br />

Comment: Two commenters requested that we specify what<br />

constituted an acceptable validation strategy for<br />

registries.<br />

Response: As a result of the MMSEA, which was enacted<br />

in December, 2007, and modified the PQRI, we implemented<br />

registry-based submission for the 2008 PQRI. Thus, for<br />

2008, we required registry vendors to supply <strong>CMS</strong> with their<br />

validation strategy that would detail how the registry<br />

would ensure that the data the registry reported to <strong>CMS</strong> was<br />

accurate. We found that there are several variations for<br />

this process that registries use. We do not believe we<br />

have enough experience with registries to specify a single<br />

validation strategy that all should employ and we believe<br />

we are benefited from allowing a variety of such techniques<br />

to be employed based on our approval at this point.<br />

Therefore, for the 2009 PQRI, registry vendors will again<br />

be required to supply us with their validation strategy<br />

that details how the registry would ensure that the data<br />

the registry reports to us is accurate. In addition, we<br />

note that registries are required to sign an attestation<br />

statement to <strong>CMS</strong> vouching for the accuracy of the data that<br />

571

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!