Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC clarification on which 30 patients should be included in the consecutive patient sample. Response: We are pleased that many commenters found the 30 consecutive patient reporting option to be useful and were supportive of this option. We agree that a sample of 30 consecutive patients would be a nonrandom sample, but it is our intention to allow physicians and other eligible professionals greater flexibility and opportunities to participate in PQRI. In addition, requiring consecutive patients would prevent eligible professionals from being able to selectively report cases to enhance their performance rates. While we do not have the results of the 2008 PQRI reporting, we believe that a minimum sample size of 30 consecutive patients is sufficient to calculate comparable performance rates across eligible professionals furnishing comparable services. Patient sample sizes of 30 are commonly considered to be a reasonable minimum threshold for being able to reliably report health care performance measurement results. Results from our Better Quality Information for Medicare Beneficiaries (BQI) pilot project indicate that minimum patient sample sizes of between 30 through 50 patients per physician are needed to make reliable distinctions between physicians’ performance. 556
CMS-1403-FC (Delmarva Foundation for Medical Care. Enhancing Physician Quality Performance Measurement and Reporting Through Data Aggregation: The BQI Project. October 2008.) We expect additional experience with PQRI reporting to clarify optimal sample sizes and reporting criteria for use in future reporting periods. We will continually evaluate our policies on sampling and notify the public through future notice and comment rulemaking if we make substantive changes. As we evaluate our policies, we plan to continue a dialogue with stakeholders to discuss opportunities for program efficiency and flexibility. As described in Table 12, for claims-based reporting of measures groups, eligible professionals wishing to report data on measures groups using the consecutive patient criteria should include only Medicare Part B FFS patients in the consecutive patient sample. For registry- based reporting of measures groups, eligible professionals wishing to report data on measures groups using the consecutive patient criteria may include some non-Medicare FFS patients. However, there must be more than one Medicare Part B FFS patient included in this patient sample as well. Comment: We received a large volume of comments in support of discontinuing the 15 consecutive patients for a 557
- Page 505 and 506: CMS-1403-FC performing supplier for
- Page 507 and 508: CMS-1403-FC providers, the services
- Page 509 and 510: CMS-1403-FC commenter also expresse
- Page 511 and 512: CMS-1403-FC overutilization of in-o
- Page 513 and 514: CMS-1403-FC provisions for single-s
- Page 515 and 516: CMS-1403-FC we did not propose such
- Page 517 and 518: CMS-1403-FC and PCs supervised or p
- Page 519 and 520: CMS-1403-FC provisions will not app
- Page 521 and 522: CMS-1403-FC (Pub. L. 110-173) (MMSE
- Page 523 and 524: CMS-1403-FC reporting data on quali
- Page 525 and 526: CMS-1403-FC PQRI and a more detaile
- Page 527 and 528: CMS-1403-FC and our responses to th
- Page 529 and 530: CMS-1403-FC provisions of the Priva
- Page 531 and 532: CMS-1403-FC reducing eligible profe
- Page 533 and 534: CMS-1403-FC administrative or judic
- Page 535 and 536: CMS-1403-FC professionals who did n
- Page 537 and 538: CMS-1403-FC base the incentive paym
- Page 539 and 540: CMS-1403-FC A few commenters noted
- Page 541 and 542: CMS-1403-FC administrative burden t
- Page 543 and 544: CMS-1403-FC requested that more det
- Page 545 and 546: CMS-1403-FC incentive payments for
- Page 547 and 548: CMS-1403-FC December 31, 2009 and J
- Page 549 and 550: CMS-1403-FC the reporting period fo
- Page 551 and 552: CMS-1403-FC proposed to carry forwa
- Page 553 and 554: CMS-1403-FC measures group is appli
- Page 555: CMS-1403-FC measures results and nu
- Page 559 and 560: CMS-1403-FC registries to report on
- Page 561 and 562: CMS-1403-FC reporting options for r
- Page 563 and 564: CMS-1403-FC incentive payment for P
- Page 565 and 566: CMS-1403-FC to report 2009 PQRI qua
- Page 567 and 568: CMS-1403-FC Comment: We received nu
- Page 569 and 570: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One comment su
- Page 571 and 572: CMS-1403-FC quality measures result
- Page 573 and 574: CMS-1403-FC requirements listed on
- Page 575 and 576: CMS-1403-FC a data submission vendo
- Page 577 and 578: CMS-1403-FC As we stated in the CY
- Page 579 and 580: CMS-1403-FC whether eligible profes
- Page 581 and 582: CMS-1403-FC ● Agree that the regi
- Page 583 and 584: CMS-1403-FC soon thereafter as is t
- Page 585 and 586: CMS-1403-FC Comment: We received ma
- Page 587 and 588: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One commenter
- Page 589 and 590: CMS-1403-FC additional 2.0 percent
- Page 591 and 592: CMS-1403-FC EHRs in 2009. The measu
- Page 593 and 594: CMS-1403-FC i. Overview and Summary
- Page 595 and 596: CMS-1403-FC voluntary consensus sta
- Page 597 and 598: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 599 and 600: CMS-1403-FC the AMA-PCPI should be
- Page 601 and 602: CMS-1403-FC are appropriate and do
- Page 603 and 604: CMS-1403-FC to make any changes to
- Page 605 and 606: CMS-1403-FC post the measures for p
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
clarification on which 30 patients should be included in<br />
the consecutive patient sample.<br />
Response: We are pleased that many commenters found<br />
the 30 consecutive patient reporting option to be useful<br />
and were supportive of this option. We agree that a sample<br />
of 30 consecutive patients would be a nonrandom sample, but<br />
it is our intention to allow physicians and other eligible<br />
professionals greater flexibility and opportunities to<br />
participate in PQRI. In addition, requiring consecutive<br />
patients would prevent eligible professionals from being<br />
able to selectively report cases to enhance their<br />
performance rates.<br />
While we do not have the results of the 2008 PQRI<br />
reporting, we believe that a minimum sample size of 30<br />
consecutive patients is sufficient to calculate comparable<br />
performance rates across eligible professionals furnishing<br />
comparable services. Patient sample sizes of 30 are<br />
commonly considered to be a reasonable minimum threshold<br />
for being able to reliably report health care performance<br />
measurement results. Results from our Better Quality<br />
Information for Medicare Beneficiaries (BQI) pilot project<br />
indicate that minimum patient sample sizes of between 30<br />
through 50 patients per physician are needed to make<br />
reliable distinctions between physicians’ performance.<br />
556