Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC claims processing systems needed to be able to accept the PQRI quality data codes and attribute them to an eligible professional, it is unknown at this time whether these changes can be made without undue burden to our systems or what the timeline for potential implementation would be. Regarding the concern that pathologists who bill through independent laboratories are unable to participate in the PQRI, we note that only eligible professionals as defined in section 1848(k)(3)(B)of the Act are eligible to participate in PQRI. As discussed in section II.O1.a.ii. above, “eligible professional” is defined to include physicians, other practitioners as described in section 1842(b)(18)(C) of the Act, physical and occupational therapists, qualified speech-language pathologists, and qualified audiologists for the purposes of the 2009 PQRI. As noted in the comment, independent laboratories are suppliers and are therefore not eligible to participate in PQRI. Pathologists who bill directly to Medicare, however, are eligible to participate in PQRI. Comment: Several commenters noted the mechanism for viewing the feedback reports was too cumbersome and were concerned about the lack of timely feedback (both in terms of when the feedback reports are received and when incentive payments are received). Several commenters 542
CMS-1403-FC requested that more detailed information be provided in the feedback reports so that eligible professionals can reconcile CMS’ data with their own claims information to ensure that codes were submitted accurately, captured by the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC), transferred to the PQRI data system, and result in meaningful data that corresponds to the eligible professional’s own experience. Response: Although, as discussed in sections II.S.6. and III. of this final rule with comment period, section 1848(n) of the Act, as added by the MIPPA, requires the Secretary to establish a Physician Feedback Program to provide confidential reports to physicians (and, if determined appropriate by the Secretary, groups of physicians) that measure the resources involved in furnishing care to Medicare Part B patients, we are not statutorily required to provide participants with feedback reports on the quality measures data submitted for the PQRI and are not committing to provide feedback reports for claims-based submission of quality measures data for the 2009 PQRI. For registry-based reporting in 2009, we would rely on the participating registries to provide feedback to participating eligible professionals. We do, however, understand the value of receiving meaningful feedback reports and, to the extent that we 543
- Page 491 and 492: CMS-1403-FC supervised in the offic
- Page 493 and 494: CMS-1403-FC reducing access to care
- Page 495 and 496: CMS-1403-FC commenter supported ado
- Page 497 and 498: CMS-1403-FC “outside supplier,”
- Page 499 and 500: CMS-1403-FC group could recover onl
- Page 501 and 502: CMS-1403-FC incurred, thereby compe
- Page 503 and 504: CMS-1403-FC needed to provide the t
- Page 505 and 506: CMS-1403-FC performing supplier for
- Page 507 and 508: CMS-1403-FC providers, the services
- Page 509 and 510: CMS-1403-FC commenter also expresse
- Page 511 and 512: CMS-1403-FC overutilization of in-o
- Page 513 and 514: CMS-1403-FC provisions for single-s
- Page 515 and 516: CMS-1403-FC we did not propose such
- Page 517 and 518: CMS-1403-FC and PCs supervised or p
- Page 519 and 520: CMS-1403-FC provisions will not app
- Page 521 and 522: CMS-1403-FC (Pub. L. 110-173) (MMSE
- Page 523 and 524: CMS-1403-FC reporting data on quali
- Page 525 and 526: CMS-1403-FC PQRI and a more detaile
- Page 527 and 528: CMS-1403-FC and our responses to th
- Page 529 and 530: CMS-1403-FC provisions of the Priva
- Page 531 and 532: CMS-1403-FC reducing eligible profe
- Page 533 and 534: CMS-1403-FC administrative or judic
- Page 535 and 536: CMS-1403-FC professionals who did n
- Page 537 and 538: CMS-1403-FC base the incentive paym
- Page 539 and 540: CMS-1403-FC A few commenters noted
- Page 541: CMS-1403-FC administrative burden t
- Page 545 and 546: CMS-1403-FC incentive payments for
- Page 547 and 548: CMS-1403-FC December 31, 2009 and J
- Page 549 and 550: CMS-1403-FC the reporting period fo
- Page 551 and 552: CMS-1403-FC proposed to carry forwa
- Page 553 and 554: CMS-1403-FC measures group is appli
- Page 555 and 556: CMS-1403-FC measures results and nu
- Page 557 and 558: CMS-1403-FC (Delmarva Foundation fo
- Page 559 and 560: CMS-1403-FC registries to report on
- Page 561 and 562: CMS-1403-FC reporting options for r
- Page 563 and 564: CMS-1403-FC incentive payment for P
- Page 565 and 566: CMS-1403-FC to report 2009 PQRI qua
- Page 567 and 568: CMS-1403-FC Comment: We received nu
- Page 569 and 570: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One comment su
- Page 571 and 572: CMS-1403-FC quality measures result
- Page 573 and 574: CMS-1403-FC requirements listed on
- Page 575 and 576: CMS-1403-FC a data submission vendo
- Page 577 and 578: CMS-1403-FC As we stated in the CY
- Page 579 and 580: CMS-1403-FC whether eligible profes
- Page 581 and 582: CMS-1403-FC ● Agree that the regi
- Page 583 and 584: CMS-1403-FC soon thereafter as is t
- Page 585 and 586: CMS-1403-FC Comment: We received ma
- Page 587 and 588: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One commenter
- Page 589 and 590: CMS-1403-FC additional 2.0 percent
- Page 591 and 592: CMS-1403-FC EHRs in 2009. The measu
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
claims processing systems needed to be able to accept the<br />
PQRI quality data codes and attribute them to an eligible<br />
professional, it is unknown at this time whether these<br />
changes can be made without undue burden to our systems or<br />
what the timeline for potential implementation would be.<br />
Regarding the concern that pathologists who bill<br />
through independent laboratories are unable to participate<br />
in the PQRI, we note that only eligible professionals as<br />
defined in section 1848(k)(3)(B)of the Act are eligible to<br />
participate in PQRI. As discussed in section II.O1.a.ii.<br />
above, “eligible professional” is defined to include<br />
physicians, other practitioners as described in section<br />
1842(b)(18)(C) of the Act, physical and occupational<br />
therapists, qualified speech-language pathologists, and<br />
qualified audiologists for the purposes of the 2009 PQRI.<br />
As noted in the comment, independent laboratories are<br />
suppliers and are therefore not eligible to participate in<br />
PQRI. Pathologists who bill directly to Medicare, however,<br />
are eligible to participate in PQRI.<br />
Comment: Several commenters noted the mechanism for<br />
viewing the feedback reports was too cumbersome and were<br />
concerned about the lack of timely feedback (both in terms<br />
of when the feedback reports are received and when<br />
incentive payments are received). Several commenters<br />
542