Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC have made it virtually impossible for physician practices or suppliers potentially subject to these rules to plan for compliance or alternative arrangements by January 1, 2009. One commenter requested that, if we do proceed with the extension of the anti-markup provision, the effective date of the rule be delayed until regulatory language can be proposed for each of the alternatives under consideration and there has been additional time to understand the impact of each proposal. A commenter recommended that we delay beyond January 1, 2009, the application of any further revisions until we can fully evaluate the effect of such revisions on physician groups and work with the medical community to simplify and streamline the anti-markup provisions, so that their application is clear to all involved. One commenter requested that we consider delaying the proposals until further evaluation is completed on the impact of recent changes affecting physicians such as MIPPA, DRA, “Bottom-Up Methodology” and the proposed IDFT requirements. Another commenter recommended that implementation should be delayed and that we should use the process set forth by the Congress in MIPPA to establish accreditation requirements for medical imaging to assess the appropriate use of imaging services and to examine the perceived 510
CMS-1403-FC overutilization of in-office imaging. A commenter recommended that we defer to the Congress regarding concerns of overutilization of diagnostic testing services. According to the commenter, the directives in MIPPA, released after the current proposed rule, are much clearer on this issue. The commenter noted that the Congress did not amend the anti-markup provision, choosing instead to direct the agency to develop a demonstration project to determine the appropriateness of advanced diagnostic imaging services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries and require accreditation of advanced diagnostic imaging suppliers by 2012. Response: We do not agree with the commenters that suggested a delayed effective date beyond January 1, 2009 for either the revisions made by the CY 2008 PFS final rule with comment period or the revisions that we are making in this CY 2009 PFS final rule with comment period. We have decided to make the finalized revisions effective as of January 1, 2009. When we delayed, until January 1, 2009, the application of the revisions to §414.50 we made in the CY 2008 PFS final rule with comment period (except with respect to certain diagnostic testing arrangements involving anatomic pathology performed in a “centralized building” for which the revisions were applicable January 511
- Page 459 and 460: CMS-1403-FC physicians the flexibil
- Page 461 and 462: CMS-1403-FC Response: We recognize
- Page 463 and 464: CMS-1403-FC Response: Because the d
- Page 465 and 466: CMS-1403-FC limited by the proposed
- Page 467 and 468: CMS-1403-FC Response: With respect
- Page 469 and 470: CMS-1403-FC to focus on the medical
- Page 471 and 472: CMS-1403-FC service” approach bec
- Page 473 and 474: CMS-1403-FC have the right to recei
- Page 475 and 476: CMS-1403-FC 2 approach finalized he
- Page 477 and 478: CMS-1403-FC the ordering physician
- Page 479 and 480: CMS-1403-FC ensure an adequate nexu
- Page 481 and 482: CMS-1403-FC entity” should be def
- Page 483 and 484: CMS-1403-FC between the performing
- Page 485 and 486: CMS-1403-FC supplier” to encompas
- Page 487 and 488: CMS-1403-FC to continue to provide
- Page 489 and 490: CMS-1403-FC requirements of the Alt
- Page 491 and 492: CMS-1403-FC supervised in the offic
- Page 493 and 494: CMS-1403-FC reducing access to care
- Page 495 and 496: CMS-1403-FC commenter supported ado
- Page 497 and 498: CMS-1403-FC “outside supplier,”
- Page 499 and 500: CMS-1403-FC group could recover onl
- Page 501 and 502: CMS-1403-FC incurred, thereby compe
- Page 503 and 504: CMS-1403-FC needed to provide the t
- Page 505 and 506: CMS-1403-FC performing supplier for
- Page 507 and 508: CMS-1403-FC providers, the services
- Page 509: CMS-1403-FC commenter also expresse
- Page 513 and 514: CMS-1403-FC provisions for single-s
- Page 515 and 516: CMS-1403-FC we did not propose such
- Page 517 and 518: CMS-1403-FC and PCs supervised or p
- Page 519 and 520: CMS-1403-FC provisions will not app
- Page 521 and 522: CMS-1403-FC (Pub. L. 110-173) (MMSE
- Page 523 and 524: CMS-1403-FC reporting data on quali
- Page 525 and 526: CMS-1403-FC PQRI and a more detaile
- Page 527 and 528: CMS-1403-FC and our responses to th
- Page 529 and 530: CMS-1403-FC provisions of the Priva
- Page 531 and 532: CMS-1403-FC reducing eligible profe
- Page 533 and 534: CMS-1403-FC administrative or judic
- Page 535 and 536: CMS-1403-FC professionals who did n
- Page 537 and 538: CMS-1403-FC base the incentive paym
- Page 539 and 540: CMS-1403-FC A few commenters noted
- Page 541 and 542: CMS-1403-FC administrative burden t
- Page 543 and 544: CMS-1403-FC requested that more det
- Page 545 and 546: CMS-1403-FC incentive payments for
- Page 547 and 548: CMS-1403-FC December 31, 2009 and J
- Page 549 and 550: CMS-1403-FC the reporting period fo
- Page 551 and 552: CMS-1403-FC proposed to carry forwa
- Page 553 and 554: CMS-1403-FC measures group is appli
- Page 555 and 556: CMS-1403-FC measures results and nu
- Page 557 and 558: CMS-1403-FC (Delmarva Foundation fo
- Page 559 and 560: CMS-1403-FC registries to report on
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
overutilization of in-office imaging. A commenter<br />
recommended that we defer to the Congress regarding<br />
concerns of overutilization of diagnostic testing services.<br />
According to the commenter, the directives in MIPPA,<br />
released after the current proposed rule, are much clearer<br />
on this issue. The commenter noted that the Congress did<br />
not amend the anti-markup provision, choosing instead to<br />
direct the agency to develop a demonstration project to<br />
determine the appropriateness of advanced diagnostic<br />
imaging services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries and<br />
require accreditation of advanced diagnostic imaging<br />
suppliers by 2012.<br />
Response: We do not agree with the commenters that<br />
suggested a delayed effective date beyond January 1, 2009<br />
for either the revisions made by the CY 2008 PFS final rule<br />
with comment period or the revisions that we are making in<br />
this CY 2009 PFS final rule with comment period. We have<br />
decided to make the finalized revisions effective as of<br />
January 1, 2009. When we delayed, until January 1, 2009,<br />
the application of the revisions to §414.50 we made in the<br />
CY 2008 PFS final rule with comment period (except with<br />
respect to certain diagnostic testing arrangements<br />
involving anatomic pathology performed in a “centralized<br />
building” for which the revisions were applicable January<br />
511