19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

providers, the services provided, and associated charges as<br />

separate line items on a single Medicare claim form. The<br />

commenters further asserted that we would be able to<br />

reconcile TC and PC components without an increase in<br />

billing expenses to either the providers or Medicare. One<br />

commenter expressed its view that the most straightforward<br />

way to address potential overutilization caused by<br />

physicians being able to profit by billing for diagnostic<br />

services performed by others would be to implement a direct<br />

billing requirement. The commenter suggested that this<br />

would be a simple, understandable, bright-line rule that<br />

could be effectively implemented and monitored. Another<br />

commenter supported the establishment of direct billing for<br />

anatomic and clinical pathology services for all payers,<br />

public and private, so that payment should be made only to<br />

the person or entity that performed or supervised the<br />

service, except for referrals between laboratories<br />

independent of a physician’s office. According to this<br />

commenter, this policy would be consistent with ethics<br />

principles that discourage fee-splitting.<br />

Response: We appreciate the comments on whether, in<br />

addition to or in lieu of the anti-markup provision, we<br />

should prohibit reassignment in certain situations and<br />

require the physician supervising the TC or performing the<br />

507

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!