Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC billing physician or other supplier and the TC does not meet the site-of-service requirements of Alternative 2 (that is, the TC was not conducted in the “office of the billing physician or other supplier” or was not supervised in the “office of the billing physician or other supplier” by a physician who is an owner, employee, or contractor of the billing physician or other supplier). If the TC does not require physician supervision under our rules, the anti-markup provisions are inapplicable. i. Specific Solicitation of Comments (1) Net charge Comment: We stated that we were interested in receiving comments concerning the calculation of the “net charge” when the anti-markup provisions apply (73 FR 38548). In response, many commenters expressed concern that we did not propose to allow practices to which the anti-markup provisions apply to recoup at least their direct practice costs where the practice is limited to billing Medicare its “net charge” for the testing service. One commenter asserted that if a group provides diagnostic tests at a site other than the “office of the billing physician or other supplier,” the calculation of a net charge is difficult and punitive because a group practice cannot consider all of the actual components of costs 500

CMS-1403-FC incurred, thereby compelling the group practice to lose money. Another commenter argued that is “grossly unfair” to not allow physicians to recover any overhead costs. The commenter further contended that, although we may be concerned about physicians who may “pad” their charges with illegitimate amounts, this does not justify penalizing providers who incur appropriate and often costly overhead costs. According to the commenter, it would go against well-established Medicare policy to not allow physicians to include legitimate costs in calculating a net charge. Another commenter stated that many suppliers would incur a loss, not just fail to profit, if we adopt these “confusing and hyper-technical rules” are adopted. For example, the commenter asserted, a billing physician would be prohibited from billing for the costs incurred when a technician performs the TC of a test because the physician group may bill only for the cost of the physician who supervised the test. The commenter also stated that the proposal effectively prohibits the payment for qualified technicians in the performance of the TC of diagnostic tests, or, in the alternative, requires that physicians who choose to provide their patients with such tests do so at a loss. One commenter explained that it is common practice for physician groups to provide pathologists with office space, 501

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

incurred, thereby compelling the group practice to lose<br />

money. Another commenter argued that is “grossly unfair”<br />

to not allow physicians to recover any overhead costs. The<br />

commenter further contended that, although we may be<br />

concerned about physicians who may “pad” their charges with<br />

illegitimate amounts, this does not justify penalizing<br />

providers who incur appropriate and often costly overhead<br />

costs. According to the commenter, it would go against<br />

well-established Medicare policy to not allow physicians to<br />

include legitimate costs in calculating a net charge.<br />

Another commenter stated that many suppliers would incur a<br />

loss, not just fail to profit, if we adopt these “confusing<br />

and hyper-technical rules” are adopted. For example, the<br />

commenter asserted, a billing physician would be prohibited<br />

from billing for the costs incurred when a technician<br />

performs the TC of a test because the physician group may<br />

bill only for the cost of the physician who supervised the<br />

test. The commenter also stated that the proposal<br />

effectively prohibits the payment for qualified technicians<br />

in the performance of the TC of diagnostic tests, or, in<br />

the alternative, requires that physicians who choose to<br />

provide their patients with such tests do so at a loss.<br />

One commenter explained that it is common practice for<br />

physician groups to provide pathologists with office space,<br />

501

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!