19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

group could recover only the fees it paid to the physician<br />

for the TC and not any amounts paid directly to the<br />

histotechnologist who furnished the TC. The commenter also<br />

requested clarification regarding application of the rule<br />

where a group purc<strong>has</strong>es the TC directly from an outside<br />

supplier or histotechnologist, without any physician<br />

involvement.<br />

Response: The commenter is correct in that the<br />

performing supplier of the TC is the physician who<br />

supervised the TC. Where the anti-markup payment<br />

limitation applies, the billing physician or other supplier<br />

may bill for the lowest of the following amounts: (1) the<br />

performing supplier’s net charge to the billing physician<br />

or other supplier; (2) the billing physician or other<br />

supplier’s actual charge; or (3) the fee schedule amount<br />

for the test that would be allowed if the performing<br />

supplier billed directly. With respect to the commenter’s<br />

question regarding whether a TC purc<strong>has</strong>ed from a supplier<br />

“without any physician involvement,” as noted in this<br />

section II.N.2.h., we have deleted the references to<br />

purc<strong>has</strong>ed tests or interpretations from an “outside<br />

supplier.” The anti-markup payment limitation will apply<br />

if a TC is supervised by a physician who does not, within<br />

the meaning of Alternative 1, share a practice with the<br />

499

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!