Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC is not in the office when the test is being performed. According to the commenter, this runs counter to long standing Medicare regulation and policy regarding the supervision of diagnostic tests, as many of these tests do not require physician presence during the performance of the test. The commenter argued that changing this, requiring physicians to be present, would only inflate healthcare costs. A commenter recommended that TCs and PCs of non- purchased items performed outside the office of the billing physician or other supplier not be subject to the anti- markup provisions, noting that many audiologists are self- employed and perform testing services for off-site physicians. The commenter further asserted that audiology services do not require physician supervision, and per CMS transmittal 84 (issued February 29, 2008 and effective April 1, 2008), these services are to be billed by the provider of the service and benefits reassigned to the employer. The commenter contended that there has been no evidence of abuse with respect to billed audiology services, so no change is warranted. Response: We are adopting our proposal that, for purposes of satisfying the requirements of Alternative 2 with respect to the TC, the TC must be both conducted and 490
CMS-1403-FC supervised in the office of the billing physician or other supplier. Although the requirement that the supervising physician be present in the office of the billing physician or other supplier may be more restrictive than some Medicare coverage and payments regulations governing supervision of tests, we believe that our amendment to §414.50(a)(2)(iii) is necessary in order to minimize the potential for overutilization and program abuse. We do not believe that healthcare costs would be inflated if physicians were required to be present in the office of the billing physician or other supplier. If the test was not conducted within the office of the billing physician or other supplier, and/or the physician supervision did not occur within the office of the billing physician or other supplier, the service would still be payable by Medicare. We recognize that where audiologist services are performed by an audiologist, no physician supervision is necessary, and therefore the anti-markup provisions do not apply (because §414.50 applies to tests performed by a physician). We note further, however, that the TC of some audiological tests can be conducted by a technician and supervised by a physician, in which case, the anti-markup provisions potentially are applicable to the TCs and PCs of such tests. Although the commenter stated that there is no 491
- Page 439 and 440: CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act,
- Page 441 and 442: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 443 and 444: CMS-1403-FC her group practice woul
- Page 445 and 446: CMS-1403-FC A commenter representin
- Page 447 and 448: CMS-1403-FC tenens arrangements cou
- Page 449 and 450: CMS-1403-FC other supplier. We are
- Page 451 and 452: CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or
- Page 453 and 454: CMS-1403-FC patients. According to
- Page 455 and 456: CMS-1403-FC from sharing a practice
- Page 457 and 458: CMS-1403-FC Group A orders the TC a
- Page 459 and 460: CMS-1403-FC physicians the flexibil
- Page 461 and 462: CMS-1403-FC Response: We recognize
- Page 463 and 464: CMS-1403-FC Response: Because the d
- Page 465 and 466: CMS-1403-FC limited by the proposed
- Page 467 and 468: CMS-1403-FC Response: With respect
- Page 469 and 470: CMS-1403-FC to focus on the medical
- Page 471 and 472: CMS-1403-FC service” approach bec
- Page 473 and 474: CMS-1403-FC have the right to recei
- Page 475 and 476: CMS-1403-FC 2 approach finalized he
- Page 477 and 478: CMS-1403-FC the ordering physician
- Page 479 and 480: CMS-1403-FC ensure an adequate nexu
- Page 481 and 482: CMS-1403-FC entity” should be def
- Page 483 and 484: CMS-1403-FC between the performing
- Page 485 and 486: CMS-1403-FC supplier” to encompas
- Page 487 and 488: CMS-1403-FC to continue to provide
- Page 489: CMS-1403-FC requirements of the Alt
- Page 493 and 494: CMS-1403-FC reducing access to care
- Page 495 and 496: CMS-1403-FC commenter supported ado
- Page 497 and 498: CMS-1403-FC “outside supplier,”
- Page 499 and 500: CMS-1403-FC group could recover onl
- Page 501 and 502: CMS-1403-FC incurred, thereby compe
- Page 503 and 504: CMS-1403-FC needed to provide the t
- Page 505 and 506: CMS-1403-FC performing supplier for
- Page 507 and 508: CMS-1403-FC providers, the services
- Page 509 and 510: CMS-1403-FC commenter also expresse
- Page 511 and 512: CMS-1403-FC overutilization of in-o
- Page 513 and 514: CMS-1403-FC provisions for single-s
- Page 515 and 516: CMS-1403-FC we did not propose such
- Page 517 and 518: CMS-1403-FC and PCs supervised or p
- Page 519 and 520: CMS-1403-FC provisions will not app
- Page 521 and 522: CMS-1403-FC (Pub. L. 110-173) (MMSE
- Page 523 and 524: CMS-1403-FC reporting data on quali
- Page 525 and 526: CMS-1403-FC PQRI and a more detaile
- Page 527 and 528: CMS-1403-FC and our responses to th
- Page 529 and 530: CMS-1403-FC provisions of the Priva
- Page 531 and 532: CMS-1403-FC reducing eligible profe
- Page 533 and 534: CMS-1403-FC administrative or judic
- Page 535 and 536: CMS-1403-FC professionals who did n
- Page 537 and 538: CMS-1403-FC base the incentive paym
- Page 539 and 540: CMS-1403-FC A few commenters noted
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
is not in the office when the test is being performed.<br />
According to the commenter, this runs counter to long<br />
standing Medicare regulation and policy regarding the<br />
supervision of diagnostic tests, as many of these tests do<br />
not require physician presence during the performance of<br />
the test. The commenter argued that changing this,<br />
requiring physicians to be present, would only inflate<br />
healthcare costs.<br />
A commenter recommended that TCs and PCs of non-<br />
purc<strong>has</strong>ed items performed outside the office of the billing<br />
physician or other supplier not be subject to the anti-<br />
markup provisions, noting that many audiologists are self-<br />
employed and perform testing services for off-site<br />
physicians. The commenter further asserted that audiology<br />
services do not require physician supervision, and per <strong>CMS</strong><br />
transmittal 84 (issued February 29, 2008 and effective<br />
April 1, 2008), these services are to be billed by the<br />
provider of the service and benefits reassigned to the<br />
employer. The commenter contended that there <strong>has</strong> <strong>been</strong> no<br />
evidence of abuse with respect to billed audiology<br />
services, so no change is warranted.<br />
Response: We are adopting our proposal that, for<br />
purposes of satisfying the requirements of Alternative 2<br />
with respect to the TC, the TC must be both conducted and<br />
490