Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC include a mobile van that is used in the parking lot of a building in which the physician group sees patients. “Same building,” as defined at §411.351 of the physician self- referral regulations, specifically excludes a mobile vehicle, van, or trailer. Therefore, unless provided in a mobile unit that qualifies as a “centralized building” (as defined at §411.351), diagnostic services provided in the parking lot of a building in which a physician group sees patients already would be subject to the physician self-referral restrictions and would not be protected under the in-office ancillary services exception. In the January 4, 2001 Phase I final rule with comment period, we discussed our specific reasons for declining to include within the definition of “same building” a mobile van or other unit (66 FR 889 through 892). We are concerned with the potential for confusion if we were to have one definition of “same building” for physician self-referral purposes and another, more expansive definition for purposes of applying the anti-markup payment limitation. Moreover, we decline to expand the definition of “same building” for purposes of applying the anti-markup provisions given the potential we see for overutilization through arrangements that take place outside the “same building.” Again, arrangements that do not satisfy the 488

CMS-1403-FC requirements of the Alternative 2 “site-of-service” approach may fit under the requirements of the Alternative 1 “substantially all” professional services approach. g. Services Performed at a Site Other Than the Office of the Billing Physician or Other Supplier Comment: A commenter offered strong support for the proposed clarification that “if the TC is conducted outside the office of the billing physician or other supplier, the anti-markup provision applies irrespective of whether the supervision takes place in the office of the billing physician or other supplier.” The same commenter also supported our proposal that the anti-markup payment limitation would apply if “either the conducting of the TC or the supervising of the TC takes place outside the office of the billing physician or other supplier.” Another commenter supported the proposed change that the anti- markup payment limitation would apply if the TC is either conducted or supervised outside the office of the billing physician or other supplier in order to eliminate confusion among providers when determining whether the TC is deemed to be provided by an outside supplier for purposes of the anti-markup provisions. Another commenter expressed concern that the TC will be considered to be performed outside the office of the billing supplier if the physician 489

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

requirements of the Alternative 2 “site-of-service”<br />

approach may fit under the requirements of the Alternative<br />

1 “substantially all” professional services approach.<br />

g. Services Performed at a Site Other Than the Office of<br />

the Billing Physician or Other Supplier<br />

Comment: A commenter offered strong support for the<br />

proposed clarification that “if the TC is conducted outside<br />

the office of the billing physician or other supplier, the<br />

anti-markup provision applies irrespective of whether the<br />

supervision takes place in the office of the billing<br />

physician or other supplier.” The same commenter also<br />

supported our proposal that the anti-markup payment<br />

limitation would apply if “either the conducting of the TC<br />

or the supervising of the TC takes place outside the office<br />

of the billing physician or other supplier.” Another<br />

commenter supported the proposed change that the anti-<br />

markup payment limitation would apply if the TC is either<br />

conducted or supervised outside the office of the billing<br />

physician or other supplier in order to eliminate confusion<br />

among providers when determining whether the TC is deemed<br />

to be provided by an outside supplier for purposes of the<br />

anti-markup provisions. Another commenter expressed<br />

concern that the TC will be considered to be performed<br />

outside the office of the billing supplier if the physician<br />

489

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!