Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC include a mobile van that is used in the parking lot of a building in which the physician group sees patients. “Same building,” as defined at §411.351 of the physician self- referral regulations, specifically excludes a mobile vehicle, van, or trailer. Therefore, unless provided in a mobile unit that qualifies as a “centralized building” (as defined at §411.351), diagnostic services provided in the parking lot of a building in which a physician group sees patients already would be subject to the physician self-referral restrictions and would not be protected under the in-office ancillary services exception. In the January 4, 2001 Phase I final rule with comment period, we discussed our specific reasons for declining to include within the definition of “same building” a mobile van or other unit (66 FR 889 through 892). We are concerned with the potential for confusion if we were to have one definition of “same building” for physician self-referral purposes and another, more expansive definition for purposes of applying the anti-markup payment limitation. Moreover, we decline to expand the definition of “same building” for purposes of applying the anti-markup provisions given the potential we see for overutilization through arrangements that take place outside the “same building.” Again, arrangements that do not satisfy the 488
CMS-1403-FC requirements of the Alternative 2 “site-of-service” approach may fit under the requirements of the Alternative 1 “substantially all” professional services approach. g. Services Performed at a Site Other Than the Office of the Billing Physician or Other Supplier Comment: A commenter offered strong support for the proposed clarification that “if the TC is conducted outside the office of the billing physician or other supplier, the anti-markup provision applies irrespective of whether the supervision takes place in the office of the billing physician or other supplier.” The same commenter also supported our proposal that the anti-markup payment limitation would apply if “either the conducting of the TC or the supervising of the TC takes place outside the office of the billing physician or other supplier.” Another commenter supported the proposed change that the anti- markup payment limitation would apply if the TC is either conducted or supervised outside the office of the billing physician or other supplier in order to eliminate confusion among providers when determining whether the TC is deemed to be provided by an outside supplier for purposes of the anti-markup provisions. Another commenter expressed concern that the TC will be considered to be performed outside the office of the billing supplier if the physician 489
- Page 437 and 438: CMS-1403-FC with comment period, th
- Page 439 and 440: CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act,
- Page 441 and 442: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 443 and 444: CMS-1403-FC her group practice woul
- Page 445 and 446: CMS-1403-FC A commenter representin
- Page 447 and 448: CMS-1403-FC tenens arrangements cou
- Page 449 and 450: CMS-1403-FC other supplier. We are
- Page 451 and 452: CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or
- Page 453 and 454: CMS-1403-FC patients. According to
- Page 455 and 456: CMS-1403-FC from sharing a practice
- Page 457 and 458: CMS-1403-FC Group A orders the TC a
- Page 459 and 460: CMS-1403-FC physicians the flexibil
- Page 461 and 462: CMS-1403-FC Response: We recognize
- Page 463 and 464: CMS-1403-FC Response: Because the d
- Page 465 and 466: CMS-1403-FC limited by the proposed
- Page 467 and 468: CMS-1403-FC Response: With respect
- Page 469 and 470: CMS-1403-FC to focus on the medical
- Page 471 and 472: CMS-1403-FC service” approach bec
- Page 473 and 474: CMS-1403-FC have the right to recei
- Page 475 and 476: CMS-1403-FC 2 approach finalized he
- Page 477 and 478: CMS-1403-FC the ordering physician
- Page 479 and 480: CMS-1403-FC ensure an adequate nexu
- Page 481 and 482: CMS-1403-FC entity” should be def
- Page 483 and 484: CMS-1403-FC between the performing
- Page 485 and 486: CMS-1403-FC supplier” to encompas
- Page 487: CMS-1403-FC to continue to provide
- Page 491 and 492: CMS-1403-FC supervised in the offic
- Page 493 and 494: CMS-1403-FC reducing access to care
- Page 495 and 496: CMS-1403-FC commenter supported ado
- Page 497 and 498: CMS-1403-FC “outside supplier,”
- Page 499 and 500: CMS-1403-FC group could recover onl
- Page 501 and 502: CMS-1403-FC incurred, thereby compe
- Page 503 and 504: CMS-1403-FC needed to provide the t
- Page 505 and 506: CMS-1403-FC performing supplier for
- Page 507 and 508: CMS-1403-FC providers, the services
- Page 509 and 510: CMS-1403-FC commenter also expresse
- Page 511 and 512: CMS-1403-FC overutilization of in-o
- Page 513 and 514: CMS-1403-FC provisions for single-s
- Page 515 and 516: CMS-1403-FC we did not propose such
- Page 517 and 518: CMS-1403-FC and PCs supervised or p
- Page 519 and 520: CMS-1403-FC provisions will not app
- Page 521 and 522: CMS-1403-FC (Pub. L. 110-173) (MMSE
- Page 523 and 524: CMS-1403-FC reporting data on quali
- Page 525 and 526: CMS-1403-FC PQRI and a more detaile
- Page 527 and 528: CMS-1403-FC and our responses to th
- Page 529 and 530: CMS-1403-FC provisions of the Priva
- Page 531 and 532: CMS-1403-FC reducing eligible profe
- Page 533 and 534: CMS-1403-FC administrative or judic
- Page 535 and 536: CMS-1403-FC professionals who did n
- Page 537 and 538: CMS-1403-FC base the incentive paym
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
requirements of the Alternative 2 “site-of-service”<br />
approach may fit under the requirements of the Alternative<br />
1 “substantially all” professional services approach.<br />
g. Services Performed at a Site Other Than the Office of<br />
the Billing Physician or Other Supplier<br />
Comment: A commenter offered strong support for the<br />
proposed clarification that “if the TC is conducted outside<br />
the office of the billing physician or other supplier, the<br />
anti-markup provision applies irrespective of whether the<br />
supervision takes place in the office of the billing<br />
physician or other supplier.” The same commenter also<br />
supported our proposal that the anti-markup payment<br />
limitation would apply if “either the conducting of the TC<br />
or the supervising of the TC takes place outside the office<br />
of the billing physician or other supplier.” Another<br />
commenter supported the proposed change that the anti-<br />
markup payment limitation would apply if the TC is either<br />
conducted or supervised outside the office of the billing<br />
physician or other supplier in order to eliminate confusion<br />
among providers when determining whether the TC is deemed<br />
to be provided by an outside supplier for purposes of the<br />
anti-markup provisions. Another commenter expressed<br />
concern that the TC will be considered to be performed<br />
outside the office of the billing supplier if the physician<br />
489