Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC same group and in the same specialty provide substantial physician services. The commenter asserted that, if we mean that, in order to avoid application of the anti-markup payment limitation, a specific individual physician must provide the substantial physician services in that particular location where the diagnostic services are provided, the proposal would render unprofitable many existing lawful arrangements for single-specialty practices with multiple locations. The commenter further asserted that our proposal would require physicians in multi- practice locations to rearrange schedules so as to rotate through practice locations where the diagnostic testing services are provided. One commenter contended that the focus on where the ordering physician regularly furnishes care will affect all physician groups where all the physician are not located in the same building and diagnostic testing services are only offered in a few of the group’s locations. According to the commenter, the physician self-referral law requires a group practice with multiple locations to function as one group, and group practices have structured their arrangements to meet existing governmental requirements and to serve patients. The commenter asserted that changing these requirements may make it impossible for some groups 486

CMS-1403-FC to continue to provide these services to Medicare beneficiaries. Response: We believe that the commenters’ concerns that physician practices with multiple locations will not be able to meet the “site-of-service” approach are adequately addressed by allowing billing physicians and other suppliers to comply with either the requirements of Alternative 1 or Alternative 2. Comment: A commenter requested that the definition of “office of billing physician or other supplier” be modified to include a mobile van that is used in the parking lot of a building in which the physician group sees patients. Otherwise, the commenter argued, the use of mobile MRI essentially will be barred. According to the commenter, physician groups that use mobile MRI on an exclusive basis because of the nature of their practices are not committing any abuse that we should address in the anti-markup provisions. Another commenter noted that alternative 2, as proposed, would not allow groups to operate mobile diagnostic testing services performed in mobile vehicles, vans or trailers because they are specifically excluded from the definition of “same building” at §411.351. Response: We are not modifying the definition of the “office of the billing physician or other supplier” to 487

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

same group and in the same specialty provide substantial<br />

physician services. The commenter asserted that, if we<br />

mean that, in order to avoid application of the anti-markup<br />

payment limitation, a specific individual physician must<br />

provide the substantial physician services in that<br />

particular location where the diagnostic services are<br />

provided, the proposal would render unprofitable many<br />

existing lawful arrangements for single-specialty practices<br />

with multiple locations. The commenter further asserted<br />

that our proposal would require physicians in multi-<br />

practice locations to rearrange schedules so as to rotate<br />

through practice locations where the diagnostic testing<br />

services are provided.<br />

One commenter contended that the focus on where the<br />

ordering physician regularly furnishes care will affect all<br />

physician groups where all the physician are not located in<br />

the same building and diagnostic testing services are only<br />

offered in a few of the group’s locations. According to<br />

the commenter, the physician self-referral law requires a<br />

group practice with multiple locations to function as one<br />

group, and group practices have structured their<br />

arrangements to meet existing governmental requirements and<br />

to serve patients. The commenter asserted that changing<br />

these requirements may make it impossible for some groups<br />

486

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!