Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC same group and in the same specialty provide substantial physician services. The commenter asserted that, if we mean that, in order to avoid application of the anti-markup payment limitation, a specific individual physician must provide the substantial physician services in that particular location where the diagnostic services are provided, the proposal would render unprofitable many existing lawful arrangements for single-specialty practices with multiple locations. The commenter further asserted that our proposal would require physicians in multi- practice locations to rearrange schedules so as to rotate through practice locations where the diagnostic testing services are provided. One commenter contended that the focus on where the ordering physician regularly furnishes care will affect all physician groups where all the physician are not located in the same building and diagnostic testing services are only offered in a few of the group’s locations. According to the commenter, the physician self-referral law requires a group practice with multiple locations to function as one group, and group practices have structured their arrangements to meet existing governmental requirements and to serve patients. The commenter asserted that changing these requirements may make it impossible for some groups 486
CMS-1403-FC to continue to provide these services to Medicare beneficiaries. Response: We believe that the commenters’ concerns that physician practices with multiple locations will not be able to meet the “site-of-service” approach are adequately addressed by allowing billing physicians and other suppliers to comply with either the requirements of Alternative 1 or Alternative 2. Comment: A commenter requested that the definition of “office of billing physician or other supplier” be modified to include a mobile van that is used in the parking lot of a building in which the physician group sees patients. Otherwise, the commenter argued, the use of mobile MRI essentially will be barred. According to the commenter, physician groups that use mobile MRI on an exclusive basis because of the nature of their practices are not committing any abuse that we should address in the anti-markup provisions. Another commenter noted that alternative 2, as proposed, would not allow groups to operate mobile diagnostic testing services performed in mobile vehicles, vans or trailers because they are specifically excluded from the definition of “same building” at §411.351. Response: We are not modifying the definition of the “office of the billing physician or other supplier” to 487
- Page 435 and 436: CMS-1403-FC that rule, the Governme
- Page 437 and 438: CMS-1403-FC with comment period, th
- Page 439 and 440: CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act,
- Page 441 and 442: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 443 and 444: CMS-1403-FC her group practice woul
- Page 445 and 446: CMS-1403-FC A commenter representin
- Page 447 and 448: CMS-1403-FC tenens arrangements cou
- Page 449 and 450: CMS-1403-FC other supplier. We are
- Page 451 and 452: CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or
- Page 453 and 454: CMS-1403-FC patients. According to
- Page 455 and 456: CMS-1403-FC from sharing a practice
- Page 457 and 458: CMS-1403-FC Group A orders the TC a
- Page 459 and 460: CMS-1403-FC physicians the flexibil
- Page 461 and 462: CMS-1403-FC Response: We recognize
- Page 463 and 464: CMS-1403-FC Response: Because the d
- Page 465 and 466: CMS-1403-FC limited by the proposed
- Page 467 and 468: CMS-1403-FC Response: With respect
- Page 469 and 470: CMS-1403-FC to focus on the medical
- Page 471 and 472: CMS-1403-FC service” approach bec
- Page 473 and 474: CMS-1403-FC have the right to recei
- Page 475 and 476: CMS-1403-FC 2 approach finalized he
- Page 477 and 478: CMS-1403-FC the ordering physician
- Page 479 and 480: CMS-1403-FC ensure an adequate nexu
- Page 481 and 482: CMS-1403-FC entity” should be def
- Page 483 and 484: CMS-1403-FC between the performing
- Page 485: CMS-1403-FC supplier” to encompas
- Page 489 and 490: CMS-1403-FC requirements of the Alt
- Page 491 and 492: CMS-1403-FC supervised in the offic
- Page 493 and 494: CMS-1403-FC reducing access to care
- Page 495 and 496: CMS-1403-FC commenter supported ado
- Page 497 and 498: CMS-1403-FC “outside supplier,”
- Page 499 and 500: CMS-1403-FC group could recover onl
- Page 501 and 502: CMS-1403-FC incurred, thereby compe
- Page 503 and 504: CMS-1403-FC needed to provide the t
- Page 505 and 506: CMS-1403-FC performing supplier for
- Page 507 and 508: CMS-1403-FC providers, the services
- Page 509 and 510: CMS-1403-FC commenter also expresse
- Page 511 and 512: CMS-1403-FC overutilization of in-o
- Page 513 and 514: CMS-1403-FC provisions for single-s
- Page 515 and 516: CMS-1403-FC we did not propose such
- Page 517 and 518: CMS-1403-FC and PCs supervised or p
- Page 519 and 520: CMS-1403-FC provisions will not app
- Page 521 and 522: CMS-1403-FC (Pub. L. 110-173) (MMSE
- Page 523 and 524: CMS-1403-FC reporting data on quali
- Page 525 and 526: CMS-1403-FC PQRI and a more detaile
- Page 527 and 528: CMS-1403-FC and our responses to th
- Page 529 and 530: CMS-1403-FC provisions of the Priva
- Page 531 and 532: CMS-1403-FC reducing eligible profe
- Page 533 and 534: CMS-1403-FC administrative or judic
- Page 535 and 536: CMS-1403-FC professionals who did n
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
same group and in the same specialty provide substantial<br />
physician services. The commenter asserted that, if we<br />
mean that, in order to avoid application of the anti-markup<br />
payment limitation, a specific individual physician must<br />
provide the substantial physician services in that<br />
particular location where the diagnostic services are<br />
provided, the proposal would render unprofitable many<br />
existing lawful arrangements for single-specialty practices<br />
with multiple locations. The commenter further asserted<br />
that our proposal would require physicians in multi-<br />
practice locations to rearrange schedules so as to rotate<br />
through practice locations where the diagnostic testing<br />
services are provided.<br />
One commenter contended that the focus on where the<br />
ordering physician regularly furnishes care will affect all<br />
physician groups where all the physician are not located in<br />
the same building and diagnostic testing services are only<br />
offered in a few of the group’s locations. According to<br />
the commenter, the physician self-referral law requires a<br />
group practice with multiple locations to function as one<br />
group, and group practices have structured their<br />
arrangements to meet existing governmental requirements and<br />
to serve patients. The commenter asserted that changing<br />
these requirements may make it impossible for some groups<br />
486