Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC former may be more difficult to enforce and the latter is an already-existing, well-defined concept. Comment: Several commenters responded to our solicitation for comments that would describe current business arrangements, such as those that take place on a “campus,” and that would suggest any additional or alternative criteria to permit such arrangements to avoid application of the anti-markup provisions. We received a few comments suggesting that we exempt arrangements taking place on a campus, and suggesting criteria for how we would define “campus.” For example, one commenter suggested that, to be considered “on campus,” the diagnostic center/building/entity must be located within the main building(s), or located in the physical area immediately proximate to the provider’s main building(s). Alternatively, the commenter suggested, the diagnostic testing could be performed in other areas or buildings that are not proximate to the main building(s) but which are fully integrated (that is, financially integrated and administered in concert with overall operations standards, guidelines, rules and directives), with governance and operations functions determined by central administrative processes and structures. Another commenter encouraged us to consider the “office of the billing physician or other 484

CMS-1403-FC supplier” to encompass all buildings on a campus or within a multi-campus organization and the area of the entire legally- owned organization, regardless of where the service is performed. Another commenter noted that physician practices currently are required to list each practice location with the Part B carrier, and asserted that, because of this, there is adequate information for CMS (through the carrier) to monitor the campus arrangement to assure that the geographic layout of the physician practice is a bona fide campus. Response: We believe that, at this time, providing a definition of “campus” that would be both workable for the industry yet address our concerns of potential overutilization would be difficult and may add unnecessary complexity to the final rule. We believe that the commenters’ concerns will be alleviated by allowing arrangements to satisfy the requirements of either the Alternative 1 or the Alternative 2 approach, as revised. Comment: A commenter questioned whether we intended “ordering physician” to mean an individual physician or any physician in the group. According to the commenter, in many specialty groups, a particular ordering physician will work at only one location, but the diagnostic services are provided at another location, where other physicians in the 485

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

former may be more difficult to enforce and the latter is<br />

an already-existing, well-defined concept.<br />

Comment: Several commenters responded to our<br />

solicitation for comments that would describe current<br />

business arrangements, such as those that take place on a<br />

“campus,” and that would suggest any additional or<br />

alternative criteria to permit such arrangements to avoid<br />

application of the anti-markup provisions. We received a<br />

few comments suggesting that we exempt arrangements taking<br />

place on a campus, and suggesting criteria for how we would<br />

define “campus.” For example, one commenter suggested<br />

that, to be considered “on campus,” the diagnostic<br />

center/building/entity must be located within the main<br />

building(s), or located in the physical area immediately<br />

proximate to the provider’s main building(s).<br />

Alternatively, the commenter suggested, the diagnostic<br />

testing could be performed in other areas or buildings that<br />

are not proximate to the main building(s) but which are<br />

fully integrated (that is, financially integrated and<br />

administered in concert with overall operations standards,<br />

guidelines, rules and directives), with governance and<br />

operations functions determined by central administrative<br />

processes and structures. Another commenter encouraged us<br />

to consider the “office of the billing physician or other<br />

484

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!