Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC former may be more difficult to enforce and the latter is an already-existing, well-defined concept. Comment: Several commenters responded to our solicitation for comments that would describe current business arrangements, such as those that take place on a “campus,” and that would suggest any additional or alternative criteria to permit such arrangements to avoid application of the anti-markup provisions. We received a few comments suggesting that we exempt arrangements taking place on a campus, and suggesting criteria for how we would define “campus.” For example, one commenter suggested that, to be considered “on campus,” the diagnostic center/building/entity must be located within the main building(s), or located in the physical area immediately proximate to the provider’s main building(s). Alternatively, the commenter suggested, the diagnostic testing could be performed in other areas or buildings that are not proximate to the main building(s) but which are fully integrated (that is, financially integrated and administered in concert with overall operations standards, guidelines, rules and directives), with governance and operations functions determined by central administrative processes and structures. Another commenter encouraged us to consider the “office of the billing physician or other 484
CMS-1403-FC supplier” to encompass all buildings on a campus or within a multi-campus organization and the area of the entire legally- owned organization, regardless of where the service is performed. Another commenter noted that physician practices currently are required to list each practice location with the Part B carrier, and asserted that, because of this, there is adequate information for CMS (through the carrier) to monitor the campus arrangement to assure that the geographic layout of the physician practice is a bona fide campus. Response: We believe that, at this time, providing a definition of “campus” that would be both workable for the industry yet address our concerns of potential overutilization would be difficult and may add unnecessary complexity to the final rule. We believe that the commenters’ concerns will be alleviated by allowing arrangements to satisfy the requirements of either the Alternative 1 or the Alternative 2 approach, as revised. Comment: A commenter questioned whether we intended “ordering physician” to mean an individual physician or any physician in the group. According to the commenter, in many specialty groups, a particular ordering physician will work at only one location, but the diagnostic services are provided at another location, where other physicians in the 485
- Page 433 and 434: CMS-1403-FC IDTF standards in §410
- Page 435 and 436: CMS-1403-FC that rule, the Governme
- Page 437 and 438: CMS-1403-FC with comment period, th
- Page 439 and 440: CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act,
- Page 441 and 442: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 443 and 444: CMS-1403-FC her group practice woul
- Page 445 and 446: CMS-1403-FC A commenter representin
- Page 447 and 448: CMS-1403-FC tenens arrangements cou
- Page 449 and 450: CMS-1403-FC other supplier. We are
- Page 451 and 452: CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or
- Page 453 and 454: CMS-1403-FC patients. According to
- Page 455 and 456: CMS-1403-FC from sharing a practice
- Page 457 and 458: CMS-1403-FC Group A orders the TC a
- Page 459 and 460: CMS-1403-FC physicians the flexibil
- Page 461 and 462: CMS-1403-FC Response: We recognize
- Page 463 and 464: CMS-1403-FC Response: Because the d
- Page 465 and 466: CMS-1403-FC limited by the proposed
- Page 467 and 468: CMS-1403-FC Response: With respect
- Page 469 and 470: CMS-1403-FC to focus on the medical
- Page 471 and 472: CMS-1403-FC service” approach bec
- Page 473 and 474: CMS-1403-FC have the right to recei
- Page 475 and 476: CMS-1403-FC 2 approach finalized he
- Page 477 and 478: CMS-1403-FC the ordering physician
- Page 479 and 480: CMS-1403-FC ensure an adequate nexu
- Page 481 and 482: CMS-1403-FC entity” should be def
- Page 483: CMS-1403-FC between the performing
- Page 487 and 488: CMS-1403-FC to continue to provide
- Page 489 and 490: CMS-1403-FC requirements of the Alt
- Page 491 and 492: CMS-1403-FC supervised in the offic
- Page 493 and 494: CMS-1403-FC reducing access to care
- Page 495 and 496: CMS-1403-FC commenter supported ado
- Page 497 and 498: CMS-1403-FC “outside supplier,”
- Page 499 and 500: CMS-1403-FC group could recover onl
- Page 501 and 502: CMS-1403-FC incurred, thereby compe
- Page 503 and 504: CMS-1403-FC needed to provide the t
- Page 505 and 506: CMS-1403-FC performing supplier for
- Page 507 and 508: CMS-1403-FC providers, the services
- Page 509 and 510: CMS-1403-FC commenter also expresse
- Page 511 and 512: CMS-1403-FC overutilization of in-o
- Page 513 and 514: CMS-1403-FC provisions for single-s
- Page 515 and 516: CMS-1403-FC we did not propose such
- Page 517 and 518: CMS-1403-FC and PCs supervised or p
- Page 519 and 520: CMS-1403-FC provisions will not app
- Page 521 and 522: CMS-1403-FC (Pub. L. 110-173) (MMSE
- Page 523 and 524: CMS-1403-FC reporting data on quali
- Page 525 and 526: CMS-1403-FC PQRI and a more detaile
- Page 527 and 528: CMS-1403-FC and our responses to th
- Page 529 and 530: CMS-1403-FC provisions of the Priva
- Page 531 and 532: CMS-1403-FC reducing eligible profe
- Page 533 and 534: CMS-1403-FC administrative or judic
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
former may be more difficult to enforce and the latter is<br />
an already-existing, well-defined concept.<br />
Comment: Several commenters responded to our<br />
solicitation for comments that would describe current<br />
business arrangements, such as those that take place on a<br />
“campus,” and that would suggest any additional or<br />
alternative criteria to permit such arrangements to avoid<br />
application of the anti-markup provisions. We received a<br />
few comments suggesting that we exempt arrangements taking<br />
place on a campus, and suggesting criteria for how we would<br />
define “campus.” For example, one commenter suggested<br />
that, to be considered “on campus,” the diagnostic<br />
center/building/entity must be located within the main<br />
building(s), or located in the physical area immediately<br />
proximate to the provider’s main building(s).<br />
Alternatively, the commenter suggested, the diagnostic<br />
testing could be performed in other areas or buildings that<br />
are not proximate to the main building(s) but which are<br />
fully integrated (that is, financially integrated and<br />
administered in concert with overall operations standards,<br />
guidelines, rules and directives), with governance and<br />
operations functions determined by central administrative<br />
processes and structures. Another commenter encouraged us<br />
to consider the “office of the billing physician or other<br />
484