19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

requirement with a requirement that the group practice<br />

provide in the same building “physician services unrelated<br />

to the provision of DHS on a full time basis.” According<br />

to the commenter, this revision would be consistent with<br />

the physician self-referral law and regulations, would<br />

permit all physician members of a group practice to utilize<br />

the group’s centralized DHS facility (provided that the<br />

facility is located in the same building where the group<br />

provides other physician services), and would permit the<br />

group to bill for all DHS provided in such a facility under<br />

the Medicare physician fee schedule.<br />

Response: We believe that the changes recommended by<br />

the commenters would not guard adequately against potential<br />

overutilization. In addition, we believe that sufficient<br />

flexibility is afforded multi-specialty groups and others<br />

by allowing arrangements to satisfy the requirements of<br />

either the Alternative 1 or the Alternative 2 approach, as<br />

revised.<br />

Comment: One commenter expressed concern that the<br />

provision is more complicated than necessary and, rather<br />

than a definition of “office of the billing physician or<br />

other supplier,” a definition of an “outside entity” is<br />

needed to determine which services would be affected by the<br />

anti-markup provisions. The commenter suggested “outside<br />

480

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!