Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC the Alternative 2 approach by clarifying that the performing physician must be an employee or independent contractor of the billing physician or other supplier (which has enabled us to delete the references to purchased tests from an outside supplier.) Thus, billing physicians and other suppliers may satisfy the Alternative 1 “substantially all” professional services approach or, on a case-by-case basis, the Alternative 2 “site-of-service” approach in order to avoid application of the anti-markup payment limitation. We believe that complying with either approach will address our concerns regarding potential overutilization and other abuse by establishing a sufficient nexus with the billing entity. e. Exception for physician organizations that do not have any owners who have the right to receive profit distributions Comment: We proposed an exception to the requirement that diagnostic testing be performed in the “office of the billing physician or other supplier” in order to avoid application of the anti-markup payment limitation. We proposed that (except for the purchase of a TC from an outside supplier) the anti-markup provisions would not apply to diagnostic tests ordered by a physician in a physician organization that does not have any owners who 472

CMS-1403-FC have the right to receive profit distributions. Some commenters supported adopting the proposed exception. One commenter requested clarification regarding whether the exception would apply only where the physician organization does not have any owners who have the right to receive profit distributions, or whether it would apply provided that the physician organization does not have any physician owners who have the right to receive profit distributions. In the commenter’s view, if a physician organization without physician owners is a non-profit entity with a member that is another non-physician non-profit entity with typical membership rights, the proposed exception still would apply to avoid application of the anti-markup provisions. Another commenter stated that an exception for diagnostic tests ordered by a physician in a physician organization that does not have any physician owners with a right to receive profit distributions is a bright-line approach and consistent with program safeguards. Another commenter also asked that physician practices with “titular” owners not be subject to the final rule and that the definition be consistent with the definition of “titular” ownership in the FY 2009 IPPS Final Rule (73 FR 48434, 48693). 473

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

the Alternative 2 approach by clarifying that the<br />

performing physician must be an employee or independent<br />

contractor of the billing physician or other supplier<br />

(which <strong>has</strong> enabled us to delete the references to purc<strong>has</strong>ed<br />

tests from an outside supplier.) Thus, billing physicians<br />

and other suppliers may satisfy the Alternative 1<br />

“substantially all” professional services approach or, on a<br />

case-by-case basis, the Alternative 2 “site-of-service”<br />

approach in order to avoid application of the anti-markup<br />

payment limitation. We believe that complying with either<br />

approach will address our concerns regarding potential<br />

overutilization and other abuse by establishing a<br />

sufficient nexus with the billing entity.<br />

e. Exception for physician organizations that do not have<br />

any owners who have the right to receive profit<br />

distributions<br />

Comment: We proposed an exception to the requirement<br />

that diagnostic testing be performed in the “office of the<br />

billing physician or other supplier” in order to avoid<br />

application of the anti-markup payment limitation. We<br />

proposed that (except for the purc<strong>has</strong>e of a TC from an<br />

outside supplier) the anti-markup provisions would not<br />

apply to diagnostic tests ordered by a physician in a<br />

physician organization that does not have any owners who<br />

472

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!