Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC the Alternative 2 approach by clarifying that the performing physician must be an employee or independent contractor of the billing physician or other supplier (which has enabled us to delete the references to purchased tests from an outside supplier.) Thus, billing physicians and other suppliers may satisfy the Alternative 1 “substantially all” professional services approach or, on a case-by-case basis, the Alternative 2 “site-of-service” approach in order to avoid application of the anti-markup payment limitation. We believe that complying with either approach will address our concerns regarding potential overutilization and other abuse by establishing a sufficient nexus with the billing entity. e. Exception for physician organizations that do not have any owners who have the right to receive profit distributions Comment: We proposed an exception to the requirement that diagnostic testing be performed in the “office of the billing physician or other supplier” in order to avoid application of the anti-markup payment limitation. We proposed that (except for the purchase of a TC from an outside supplier) the anti-markup provisions would not apply to diagnostic tests ordered by a physician in a physician organization that does not have any owners who 472
CMS-1403-FC have the right to receive profit distributions. Some commenters supported adopting the proposed exception. One commenter requested clarification regarding whether the exception would apply only where the physician organization does not have any owners who have the right to receive profit distributions, or whether it would apply provided that the physician organization does not have any physician owners who have the right to receive profit distributions. In the commenter’s view, if a physician organization without physician owners is a non-profit entity with a member that is another non-physician non-profit entity with typical membership rights, the proposed exception still would apply to avoid application of the anti-markup provisions. Another commenter stated that an exception for diagnostic tests ordered by a physician in a physician organization that does not have any physician owners with a right to receive profit distributions is a bright-line approach and consistent with program safeguards. Another commenter also asked that physician practices with “titular” owners not be subject to the final rule and that the definition be consistent with the definition of “titular” ownership in the FY 2009 IPPS Final Rule (73 FR 48434, 48693). 473
- Page 421 and 422: CMS-1403-FC were concerned that thi
- Page 423 and 424: CMS-1403-FC supplier will be subjec
- Page 425 and 426: CMS-1403-FC numerical test for the
- Page 427 and 428: CMS-1403-FC space in which the orde
- Page 429 and 430: CMS-1403-FC disadvantage nonproblem
- Page 431 and 432: CMS-1403-FC would be simpler to not
- Page 433 and 434: CMS-1403-FC IDTF standards in §410
- Page 435 and 436: CMS-1403-FC that rule, the Governme
- Page 437 and 438: CMS-1403-FC with comment period, th
- Page 439 and 440: CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act,
- Page 441 and 442: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 443 and 444: CMS-1403-FC her group practice woul
- Page 445 and 446: CMS-1403-FC A commenter representin
- Page 447 and 448: CMS-1403-FC tenens arrangements cou
- Page 449 and 450: CMS-1403-FC other supplier. We are
- Page 451 and 452: CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or
- Page 453 and 454: CMS-1403-FC patients. According to
- Page 455 and 456: CMS-1403-FC from sharing a practice
- Page 457 and 458: CMS-1403-FC Group A orders the TC a
- Page 459 and 460: CMS-1403-FC physicians the flexibil
- Page 461 and 462: CMS-1403-FC Response: We recognize
- Page 463 and 464: CMS-1403-FC Response: Because the d
- Page 465 and 466: CMS-1403-FC limited by the proposed
- Page 467 and 468: CMS-1403-FC Response: With respect
- Page 469 and 470: CMS-1403-FC to focus on the medical
- Page 471: CMS-1403-FC service” approach bec
- Page 475 and 476: CMS-1403-FC 2 approach finalized he
- Page 477 and 478: CMS-1403-FC the ordering physician
- Page 479 and 480: CMS-1403-FC ensure an adequate nexu
- Page 481 and 482: CMS-1403-FC entity” should be def
- Page 483 and 484: CMS-1403-FC between the performing
- Page 485 and 486: CMS-1403-FC supplier” to encompas
- Page 487 and 488: CMS-1403-FC to continue to provide
- Page 489 and 490: CMS-1403-FC requirements of the Alt
- Page 491 and 492: CMS-1403-FC supervised in the offic
- Page 493 and 494: CMS-1403-FC reducing access to care
- Page 495 and 496: CMS-1403-FC commenter supported ado
- Page 497 and 498: CMS-1403-FC “outside supplier,”
- Page 499 and 500: CMS-1403-FC group could recover onl
- Page 501 and 502: CMS-1403-FC incurred, thereby compe
- Page 503 and 504: CMS-1403-FC needed to provide the t
- Page 505 and 506: CMS-1403-FC performing supplier for
- Page 507 and 508: CMS-1403-FC providers, the services
- Page 509 and 510: CMS-1403-FC commenter also expresse
- Page 511 and 512: CMS-1403-FC overutilization of in-o
- Page 513 and 514: CMS-1403-FC provisions for single-s
- Page 515 and 516: CMS-1403-FC we did not propose such
- Page 517 and 518: CMS-1403-FC and PCs supervised or p
- Page 519 and 520: CMS-1403-FC provisions will not app
- Page 521 and 522: CMS-1403-FC (Pub. L. 110-173) (MMSE
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
the Alternative 2 approach by clarifying that the<br />
performing physician must be an employee or independent<br />
contractor of the billing physician or other supplier<br />
(which <strong>has</strong> enabled us to delete the references to purc<strong>has</strong>ed<br />
tests from an outside supplier.) Thus, billing physicians<br />
and other suppliers may satisfy the Alternative 1<br />
“substantially all” professional services approach or, on a<br />
case-by-case basis, the Alternative 2 “site-of-service”<br />
approach in order to avoid application of the anti-markup<br />
payment limitation. We believe that complying with either<br />
approach will address our concerns regarding potential<br />
overutilization and other abuse by establishing a<br />
sufficient nexus with the billing entity.<br />
e. Exception for physician organizations that do not have<br />
any owners who have the right to receive profit<br />
distributions<br />
Comment: We proposed an exception to the requirement<br />
that diagnostic testing be performed in the “office of the<br />
billing physician or other supplier” in order to avoid<br />
application of the anti-markup payment limitation. We<br />
proposed that (except for the purc<strong>has</strong>e of a TC from an<br />
outside supplier) the anti-markup provisions would not<br />
apply to diagnostic tests ordered by a physician in a<br />
physician organization that does not have any owners who<br />
472