19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

leases, by Physicians A, C and D. Neither the TC, nor the<br />

PC, is subject to the anti-markup payment limitation,<br />

because the TC and the PC were performed in the “office of<br />

the billing physician or other supplier.” We are<br />

permitting shared space arrangements for diagnostic testing<br />

services that occur in the “same building” because we<br />

believe that such arrangements can promote efficiency<br />

without raising the same concerns for overutilization or<br />

other abuse as arrangements that involve centralized<br />

buildings for diagnostic testing. We reiterate however,<br />

that we continue to have concerns with the present use of<br />

the in-office ancillary services exception and that we may<br />

issue a proposed rulemaking at a future date to address<br />

those concerns.<br />

Comment: One commenter supported the Alternative 2<br />

“site-of-service” approach as a reasonable approach to<br />

curbing potential overutilization. One commenter<br />

characterized the “site-of-service” approach as more fair<br />

than the Alternative 1 approach, even though, according to<br />

the commenter, Alternative 1 may control perceived<br />

overutilization while respecting the rights of pathologists<br />

and clinicians to practice medicine in the best manner<br />

possible. Another commenter generally was supportive of<br />

both alternatives but favored the Alternative 2 “site-of-<br />

470

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!