Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC crosswalked to 2009 services. To arrive at the indirect PE costs-- ● We apply a specialty-specific indirect percentage factor to the direct expenses to recognize the varying proportion that indirect costs represent of total costs by specialty. For a given service, the specific indirect percentage factor to apply to the direct costs for the purpose of the indirect allocation is calculated as the weighted average of the ratio of the indirect to direct costs (based on the survey data) for the specialties that furnish the service. For example, if a service is furnished by a single specialty with indirect PEs that were 75 percent of total PEs, the indirect percentage factor to apply to the direct costs for the purposes of the indirect allocation would be (0.75 / 0.25) = 3.0. The indirect percentage factor is then applied to the service level adjusted indirect PE allocators. ● We use the specialty-specific PE/HR from the SMS survey data, as well as the supplemental surveys for cardiothoracic surgery, vascular surgery, physical and occupational therapy, independent laboratories, allergy/immunology, cardiology, dermatology, radiology, gastroenterology, IDTFs, radiation oncology, and urology. (Note: For radiation oncology, the data represent the 46
CMS-1403-FC combined survey data from the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and the Association of Freestanding Radiation Oncology Centers (AFROC)). As discussed in the CY 2008 PFS final rule with comment period (72 FR 66233), the PE/HR survey data for radiology is weighted by practice size. We incorporate this PE/HR into the calculation of indirect costs using an index which reflects the relationship between each specialty’s indirect scaling factor and the overall indirect scaling factor for the entire PFS. For example, if a specialty had an indirect practice cost index of 2.00, this specialty would have an indirect scaling factor that was twice the overall average indirect scaling factor. If a specialty had an indirect practice cost index of 0.50, this specialty would have an indirect scaling factor that was half the overall average indirect scaling factor. ● When the clinical labor portion of the direct PE RVU is greater than the physician work RVU for a particular service, the indirect costs are allocated based upon the direct costs and the clinical labor costs. For example, if a service has no physician work and 1.10 direct PE RVUs, and the clinical labor portion of the direct PE RVUs is 0.65 RVUs, we would use the 1.10 direct PE RVUs and the 0.65 47
- Page 1 and 2: Notice: This CMS-approved document
- Page 3 and 4: CMS-1403-FC 3 1. Electronically. Yo
- Page 5 and 6: CMS-1403-FC 5 FOR FURTHER INFORMATI
- Page 7 and 8: CMS-1403-FC 7 Trisha Brooks, (410)7
- Page 9 and 10: CMS-1403-FC 9 ● The physician sel
- Page 11 and 12: CMS-1403-FC 11 Schedule C. Malpract
- Page 13 and 14: CMS-1403-FC 13 3. Beneficiary Signa
- Page 15 and 16: CMS-1403-FC 15 A. Summary of Issues
- Page 17 and 18: CMS-1403-FC 17 XIII. Waiver of Prop
- Page 19 and 20: CMS-1403-FC 19 BBRA [Medicare, Medi
- Page 21 and 22: CMS-1403-FC 21 E/M Evaluation and m
- Page 23 and 24: CMS-1403-FC 23 MA-PD Medicare Advan
- Page 25 and 26: CMS-1403-FC 25 OSCAR Online Survey
- Page 27 and 28: CMS-1403-FC 27 WAMP Widely availabl
- Page 29 and 30: CMS-1403-FC 29 2. Practice Expense
- Page 31 and 32: CMS-1403-FC 31 extent practicable a
- Page 33 and 34: CMS-1403-FC 33 AMA's Current Proced
- Page 35 and 36: CMS-1403-FC 35 Payment = [(RVU work
- Page 37 and 38: CMS-1403-FC 37 legislation, the PFS
- Page 39 and 40: CMS-1403-FC that time, PE RVUs were
- Page 41 and 42: CMS-1403-FC utilize a “bottom-up
- Page 43 and 44: CMS-1403-FC ● All other expenses,
- Page 45: CMS-1403-FC b. Allocation of PE to
- Page 49 and 50: CMS-1403-FC for the global componen
- Page 51 and 52: CMS-1403-FC equipment cost per minu
- Page 53 and 54: CMS-1403-FC components), then the i
- Page 55 and 56: CMS-1403-FC indirect PE for all PFS
- Page 57 and 58: CMS-1403-FC • Physical therapy ut
- Page 59 and 60: CMS-1403-FC TABLE 1: Calculation of
- Page 61 and 62: CMS-1403-FC 2. PE Proposals for CY
- Page 63 and 64: CMS-1403-FC The formula for estimat
- Page 65 and 66: CMS-1403-FC arbitrary method for ch
- Page 67 and 68: CMS-1403-FC We received no comments
- Page 69 and 70: CMS-1403-FC (iv) Contractor Pricing
- Page 71 and 72: CMS-1403-FC Response: We will ask t
- Page 73 and 74: Code CMS-1403-FC 2008/9 Description
- Page 75 and 76: CMS-1403-FC TABLE 4: Practice Expen
- Page 77 and 78: CMS-1403-FC B. Geographic Practice
- Page 79 and 80: CMS-1403-FC services, and are adjus
- Page 81 and 82: CMS-1403-FC by at least 5 percent,
- Page 83 and 84: CMS-1403-FC we decided not to proce
- Page 85 and 86: CMS-1403-FC so as part of the CY 20
- Page 87 and 88: CMS-1403-FC In the CY 2008 PFS fina
- Page 89 and 90: CMS-1403-FC are available, we would
- Page 91 and 92: CMS-1403-FC is no duplication of co
- Page 93 and 94: CMS-1403-FC practitioner) at the di
- Page 95 and 96: CMS-1403-FC PFS final rule with com
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
combined survey data from the American Society for<br />
Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and the<br />
Association of Freestanding Radiation Oncology Centers<br />
(AFROC)). As discussed in the CY 2008 PFS final rule with<br />
comment period (72 FR 66233), the PE/HR survey data for<br />
radiology is weighted by practice size. We incorporate this<br />
PE/HR into the calculation of indirect costs using an index<br />
which reflects the relationship between each specialty’s<br />
indirect scaling factor and the overall indirect scaling<br />
factor for the entire PFS. For example, if a specialty had<br />
an indirect practice cost index of 2.00, this specialty<br />
would have an indirect scaling factor that was twice the<br />
overall average indirect scaling factor. If a specialty had<br />
an indirect practice cost index of 0.50, this specialty<br />
would have an indirect scaling factor that was half the<br />
overall average indirect scaling factor.<br />
● When the clinical labor portion of the direct PE RVU<br />
is greater than the physician work RVU for a particular<br />
service, the indirect costs are allocated based upon the<br />
direct costs and the clinical labor costs. For example, if<br />
a service <strong>has</strong> no physician work and 1.10 direct PE RVUs, and<br />
the clinical labor portion of the direct PE RVUs is<br />
0.65 RVUs, we would use the 1.10 direct PE RVUs and the 0.65<br />
47
Change language