19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

in his or her own office. <strong>This</strong> commenter also suggested<br />

that our proposal would discriminate against small groups<br />

that cannot afford to employ a full-time pathologist. The<br />

commenter asserted that full-time pathologists based in<br />

small communities do not have the resources to bill and<br />

collect on their own and working for one group on a part-<br />

time basis is not sufficient.<br />

One commenter stated that it would support Alternative<br />

1 if it was extended to allow a physician to be employed by<br />

or under contract with up to three physicians or physician<br />

organizations. Commenters recommended that the “one<br />

practice” requirement be eliminated so as not to harm small<br />

and mid-sized practices that cannot afford to employ a<br />

full-time pathologist. Two commenters stated that a<br />

physician should be allowed to maintain “two or three”<br />

independent contractor or employee relationships with<br />

physician organizations and be viewed as sharing a practice<br />

with each. In the commenters’ view, this less restrictive<br />

approach would account for different practice situations<br />

while still providing considerable protection against<br />

Medicare program abuse. Another commenter requested that,<br />

in drafting any final rule, we permit physicians to provide<br />

services in rural health or medically underserved areas<br />

without the secondary arrangement precluding the physician<br />

454

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!