19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

more invasive than clinical laboratory tests such as<br />

fingerstick for hematocrit or a dipstick urine.<br />

Response: Billing physicians and other suppliers will<br />

continue to be able to employ a physician specialist on a<br />

part-time basis. Under Alternative 1, if the specialist<br />

furnishes “substantially all” (at least 75 percent) of his<br />

or her professional services through the billing physician<br />

or other supplier, the specialist “shares a practice” with<br />

the billing physician or other supplier. Because this rule<br />

finalizes both proposed approaches, if an arrangement does<br />

not satisfy the “substantially all” test of Alternative 1,<br />

the billing of a TC or PC may still avoid application of<br />

the anti-markup payment limitation if it meets, as<br />

determined on a case-by-case basis, the “site-of-service”<br />

requirements of Alternative 2. Alternatively, part-time<br />

physicians can bill Medicare directly.<br />

Comment: Some commenters contended that adoption of<br />

Alternative 1 would interfere unfairly with the practice of<br />

medicine by severely limiting physician practices’ right to<br />

organize themselves as they see fit to deliver quality care<br />

to their patients. These commenters stated that adoption<br />

of Alternative 1 would prevent a group from hiring a part-<br />

time pathologist, as is common for gastroenterology<br />

practices that provide pathology services to their<br />

452

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!