Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC with Group Practice C to render services in place of Physician B, who is on vacation. Physician B performs 100 percent of her professional services through Group Practice C. This arrangement meets the requirements of Alternative 1, because Physician B performs at least 75 percent of her professional services through Group Practice C. It is irrelevant whether, or the extent to which, Physician A furnishes professional services for Group Practice C outside the locum tenens arrangements, for purposes of determining whether the anti-markup payment limitation applies to the services provided by Physician A under the locum tenens arrangement. Comment: Many commenters were opposed to the proposed Alternative 1 approach to determining whether a physician shares a practice with the billing physician or other supplier. Some commenters stated that they employ a pathologist in-house in order to improve quality of care by: (1) using specialized pathologists for digestive diseases; (2) forming normative standards based on the practices of the physicians in the practice; and (3) decreasing the turnaround time for diagnostic tests. Other commenters, who are physicians, stated that they were unhappy with the professional services provided by commercial laboratory companies due to slow turnaround time 450
CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or difficulty in asking follow-up questions of pathologists at remote laboratories. According to these commenters, by employing a pathologist, a group practice is able to ensure that the pathologist is a specialist in a particular practice area (for example, gastroenterology), something the commenters asserted they were unable to do with commercial laboratories. A commenter expressed concern regarding Alternative 1 because, in the commenter’s view, it would unfairly limit a specialty practice (such as gastroenterology or urology) from billing and collecting the full global reimbursement from the Medicare program for services rendered by an in- office pathologist unless that pathologist works only for that physician group. The commenter stated that it should not matter if the pathologist works for more than one group practice. This commenter expressed concern that eliminating the in-office laboratory model would be a detriment to Medicare beneficiaries. Another commenter objected to our assertion that anatomic pathology services provided in a physician’s office can result in overutilization. The commenter expressed its view that gastroenterologists do not overutilize anatomic pathology, even when profiting from it, because a colon biopsy is much 451
- Page 399 and 400: CMS-1403-FC quality resulting from
- Page 401 and 402: CMS-1403-FC payments should be reas
- Page 403 and 404: CMS-1403-FC changes in referral pat
- Page 405 and 406: CMS-1403-FC the alternative, we pro
- Page 407 and 408: CMS-1403-FC finalize this condition
- Page 409 and 410: CMS-1403-FC and “quality maintena
- Page 411 and 412: CMS-1403-FC date. We seek comments
- Page 413 and 414: CMS-1403-FC existing exceptions to
- Page 415 and 416: CMS-1403-FC our general rulemaking
- Page 417 and 418: CMS-1403-FC these approaches. We pr
- Page 419 and 420: CMS-1403-FC building in which the b
- Page 421 and 422: CMS-1403-FC were concerned that thi
- Page 423 and 424: CMS-1403-FC supplier will be subjec
- Page 425 and 426: CMS-1403-FC numerical test for the
- Page 427 and 428: CMS-1403-FC space in which the orde
- Page 429 and 430: CMS-1403-FC disadvantage nonproblem
- Page 431 and 432: CMS-1403-FC would be simpler to not
- Page 433 and 434: CMS-1403-FC IDTF standards in §410
- Page 435 and 436: CMS-1403-FC that rule, the Governme
- Page 437 and 438: CMS-1403-FC with comment period, th
- Page 439 and 440: CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act,
- Page 441 and 442: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 443 and 444: CMS-1403-FC her group practice woul
- Page 445 and 446: CMS-1403-FC A commenter representin
- Page 447 and 448: CMS-1403-FC tenens arrangements cou
- Page 449: CMS-1403-FC other supplier. We are
- Page 453 and 454: CMS-1403-FC patients. According to
- Page 455 and 456: CMS-1403-FC from sharing a practice
- Page 457 and 458: CMS-1403-FC Group A orders the TC a
- Page 459 and 460: CMS-1403-FC physicians the flexibil
- Page 461 and 462: CMS-1403-FC Response: We recognize
- Page 463 and 464: CMS-1403-FC Response: Because the d
- Page 465 and 466: CMS-1403-FC limited by the proposed
- Page 467 and 468: CMS-1403-FC Response: With respect
- Page 469 and 470: CMS-1403-FC to focus on the medical
- Page 471 and 472: CMS-1403-FC service” approach bec
- Page 473 and 474: CMS-1403-FC have the right to recei
- Page 475 and 476: CMS-1403-FC 2 approach finalized he
- Page 477 and 478: CMS-1403-FC the ordering physician
- Page 479 and 480: CMS-1403-FC ensure an adequate nexu
- Page 481 and 482: CMS-1403-FC entity” should be def
- Page 483 and 484: CMS-1403-FC between the performing
- Page 485 and 486: CMS-1403-FC supplier” to encompas
- Page 487 and 488: CMS-1403-FC to continue to provide
- Page 489 and 490: CMS-1403-FC requirements of the Alt
- Page 491 and 492: CMS-1403-FC supervised in the offic
- Page 493 and 494: CMS-1403-FC reducing access to care
- Page 495 and 496: CMS-1403-FC commenter supported ado
- Page 497 and 498: CMS-1403-FC “outside supplier,”
- Page 499 and 500: CMS-1403-FC group could recover onl
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
with Group Practice C to render services in place of<br />
Physician B, who is on vacation. Physician B performs 100<br />
percent of her professional services through Group Practice<br />
C. <strong>This</strong> arrangement meets the requirements of Alternative<br />
1, because Physician B performs at least 75 percent of her<br />
professional services through Group Practice C. It is<br />
irrelevant whether, or the extent to which, Physician A<br />
furnishes professional services for Group Practice C<br />
outside the locum tenens arrangements, for purposes of<br />
determining whether the anti-markup payment limitation<br />
applies to the services provided by Physician A under the<br />
locum tenens arrangement.<br />
Comment: Many commenters were opposed to the proposed<br />
Alternative 1 approach to determining whether a physician<br />
shares a practice with the billing physician or other<br />
supplier. Some commenters stated that they employ a<br />
pathologist in-house in order to improve quality of care<br />
by: (1) using specialized pathologists for digestive<br />
diseases; (2) forming normative standards based on the<br />
practices of the physicians in the practice; and (3)<br />
decreasing the turnaround time for diagnostic tests. Other<br />
commenters, who are physicians, stated that they were<br />
unhappy with the professional services provided by<br />
commercial laboratory companies due to slow turnaround time<br />
450