Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC with Group Practice C to render services in place of Physician B, who is on vacation. Physician B performs 100 percent of her professional services through Group Practice C. This arrangement meets the requirements of Alternative 1, because Physician B performs at least 75 percent of her professional services through Group Practice C. It is irrelevant whether, or the extent to which, Physician A furnishes professional services for Group Practice C outside the locum tenens arrangements, for purposes of determining whether the anti-markup payment limitation applies to the services provided by Physician A under the locum tenens arrangement. Comment: Many commenters were opposed to the proposed Alternative 1 approach to determining whether a physician shares a practice with the billing physician or other supplier. Some commenters stated that they employ a pathologist in-house in order to improve quality of care by: (1) using specialized pathologists for digestive diseases; (2) forming normative standards based on the practices of the physicians in the practice; and (3) decreasing the turnaround time for diagnostic tests. Other commenters, who are physicians, stated that they were unhappy with the professional services provided by commercial laboratory companies due to slow turnaround time 450

CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or difficulty in asking follow-up questions of pathologists at remote laboratories. According to these commenters, by employing a pathologist, a group practice is able to ensure that the pathologist is a specialist in a particular practice area (for example, gastroenterology), something the commenters asserted they were unable to do with commercial laboratories. A commenter expressed concern regarding Alternative 1 because, in the commenter’s view, it would unfairly limit a specialty practice (such as gastroenterology or urology) from billing and collecting the full global reimbursement from the Medicare program for services rendered by an in- office pathologist unless that pathologist works only for that physician group. The commenter stated that it should not matter if the pathologist works for more than one group practice. This commenter expressed concern that eliminating the in-office laboratory model would be a detriment to Medicare beneficiaries. Another commenter objected to our assertion that anatomic pathology services provided in a physician’s office can result in overutilization. The commenter expressed its view that gastroenterologists do not overutilize anatomic pathology, even when profiting from it, because a colon biopsy is much 451

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

with Group Practice C to render services in place of<br />

Physician B, who is on vacation. Physician B performs 100<br />

percent of her professional services through Group Practice<br />

C. <strong>This</strong> arrangement meets the requirements of Alternative<br />

1, because Physician B performs at least 75 percent of her<br />

professional services through Group Practice C. It is<br />

irrelevant whether, or the extent to which, Physician A<br />

furnishes professional services for Group Practice C<br />

outside the locum tenens arrangements, for purposes of<br />

determining whether the anti-markup payment limitation<br />

applies to the services provided by Physician A under the<br />

locum tenens arrangement.<br />

Comment: Many commenters were opposed to the proposed<br />

Alternative 1 approach to determining whether a physician<br />

shares a practice with the billing physician or other<br />

supplier. Some commenters stated that they employ a<br />

pathologist in-house in order to improve quality of care<br />

by: (1) using specialized pathologists for digestive<br />

diseases; (2) forming normative standards based on the<br />

practices of the physicians in the practice; and (3)<br />

decreasing the turnaround time for diagnostic tests. Other<br />

commenters, who are physicians, stated that they were<br />

unhappy with the professional services provided by<br />

commercial laboratory companies due to slow turnaround time<br />

450

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!