Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC same-specialty locum tenens arrangements from the anti- markup provision. Response: In the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule, we requested comments on how, under Alternative 1, we could permit a physician to provide occasional services outside of his or her physician organization without the secondary arrangement precluding the physician from sharing a practice with the physician organization for purposes of applying the anti-markup provisions. To accommodate such temporary physician arrangements, we have modified Alternative 1 so that a physician will be considered to share a practice with a physician, physician organization, or other supplier if the physician furnishes at least 75 percent of his or her professional services through that physician, physician organization, or other supplier. Thus, the final rule allows a physician to furnish up to 25 percent of his or her professional services through other arrangements (including for the purpose of acting as a locum tenens physician) without disqualifying himself or herself from sharing a practice with his or her primary physician practice. We believe that our modification provides assurance that the performing physician has a sufficient nexus with the billing physician or other supplier so as to share a practice with such physician or 448
CMS-1403-FC other supplier. We are not persuaded that we should disqualify the performing physician from sharing a practice with the billing physician or other supplier if his or her locum tenens or part-time arrangements do not involve performing work for a billing physician or other supplier engaged in the same specialty as the performing physician. Immediately above, we address the issue of whether a physician may share a practice with a billing physician or other supplier despite furnishing some services through other arrangements, including acting as a locum tenens physician. In this paragraph, we address the “flip side” of this issue, that is, whether a billing physician or other supplier can avoid application of the anti-markup payment limitation where a locum tenens physician is substituting for a physician who does in fact perform “substantially all” of his or her professional services through the billing physician or other supplier. We wish to clarify that, with respect to locum tenens situations only, whether an arrangement satisfies Alternative 1 depends on whether the permanent physician (that is, the physician for whom the locum tenens physician is substituting) performs “substantially all” of his or her professional services through the billing physician or other supplier. For example, assume Physician A contracts 449
- Page 397 and 398: CMS-1403-FC reflect objective quali
- Page 399 and 400: CMS-1403-FC quality resulting from
- Page 401 and 402: CMS-1403-FC payments should be reas
- Page 403 and 404: CMS-1403-FC changes in referral pat
- Page 405 and 406: CMS-1403-FC the alternative, we pro
- Page 407 and 408: CMS-1403-FC finalize this condition
- Page 409 and 410: CMS-1403-FC and “quality maintena
- Page 411 and 412: CMS-1403-FC date. We seek comments
- Page 413 and 414: CMS-1403-FC existing exceptions to
- Page 415 and 416: CMS-1403-FC our general rulemaking
- Page 417 and 418: CMS-1403-FC these approaches. We pr
- Page 419 and 420: CMS-1403-FC building in which the b
- Page 421 and 422: CMS-1403-FC were concerned that thi
- Page 423 and 424: CMS-1403-FC supplier will be subjec
- Page 425 and 426: CMS-1403-FC numerical test for the
- Page 427 and 428: CMS-1403-FC space in which the orde
- Page 429 and 430: CMS-1403-FC disadvantage nonproblem
- Page 431 and 432: CMS-1403-FC would be simpler to not
- Page 433 and 434: CMS-1403-FC IDTF standards in §410
- Page 435 and 436: CMS-1403-FC that rule, the Governme
- Page 437 and 438: CMS-1403-FC with comment period, th
- Page 439 and 440: CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act,
- Page 441 and 442: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 443 and 444: CMS-1403-FC her group practice woul
- Page 445 and 446: CMS-1403-FC A commenter representin
- Page 447: CMS-1403-FC tenens arrangements cou
- Page 451 and 452: CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or
- Page 453 and 454: CMS-1403-FC patients. According to
- Page 455 and 456: CMS-1403-FC from sharing a practice
- Page 457 and 458: CMS-1403-FC Group A orders the TC a
- Page 459 and 460: CMS-1403-FC physicians the flexibil
- Page 461 and 462: CMS-1403-FC Response: We recognize
- Page 463 and 464: CMS-1403-FC Response: Because the d
- Page 465 and 466: CMS-1403-FC limited by the proposed
- Page 467 and 468: CMS-1403-FC Response: With respect
- Page 469 and 470: CMS-1403-FC to focus on the medical
- Page 471 and 472: CMS-1403-FC service” approach bec
- Page 473 and 474: CMS-1403-FC have the right to recei
- Page 475 and 476: CMS-1403-FC 2 approach finalized he
- Page 477 and 478: CMS-1403-FC the ordering physician
- Page 479 and 480: CMS-1403-FC ensure an adequate nexu
- Page 481 and 482: CMS-1403-FC entity” should be def
- Page 483 and 484: CMS-1403-FC between the performing
- Page 485 and 486: CMS-1403-FC supplier” to encompas
- Page 487 and 488: CMS-1403-FC to continue to provide
- Page 489 and 490: CMS-1403-FC requirements of the Alt
- Page 491 and 492: CMS-1403-FC supervised in the offic
- Page 493 and 494: CMS-1403-FC reducing access to care
- Page 495 and 496: CMS-1403-FC commenter supported ado
- Page 497 and 498: CMS-1403-FC “outside supplier,”
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
other supplier. We are not persuaded that we should<br />
disqualify the performing physician from sharing a practice<br />
with the billing physician or other supplier if his or her<br />
locum tenens or part-time arrangements do not involve<br />
performing work for a billing physician or other supplier<br />
engaged in the same specialty as the performing physician.<br />
Immediately above, we address the issue of whether a<br />
physician may share a practice with a billing physician or<br />
other supplier despite furnishing some services through<br />
other arrangements, including acting as a locum tenens<br />
physician. In this paragraph, we address the “flip side”<br />
of this issue, that is, whether a billing physician or<br />
other supplier can avoid application of the anti-markup<br />
payment limitation where a locum tenens physician is<br />
substituting for a physician who does in fact perform<br />
“substantially all” of his or her professional services<br />
through the billing physician or other supplier. We wish<br />
to clarify that, with respect to locum tenens situations<br />
only, whether an arrangement satisfies Alternative 1<br />
depends on whether the permanent physician (that is, the<br />
physician for whom the locum tenens physician is<br />
substituting) performs “substantially all” of his or her<br />
professional services through the billing physician or<br />
other supplier. For example, assume Physician A contracts<br />
449