Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC Act].” According to the commenter, the physician interpretation of a diagnostic test is not a service described in section 1861(s)(3) of the Act, as physician services are described in section 1861(s)(1) of the Act. Other commenters stated that, in enacting section 1842(n) of the Act, the Congress specifically limited the applicability of the anti-markup provisions to diagnostic tests. Commenters expressed concern that applying an anti- markup payment limitation to the PC of diagnostic tests is inconsistent with the plain meaning of the law and Congressional intent. Response: As explained in the preamble to the CY 2008 PFS final rule with comment period (72 FR 66308 through 66309), despite the fact that we implemented section 1842(n)(1) of the Act to impose an anti-markup payment limitation only on the TC of diagnostic tests, we are not prevented from applying an anti-markup payment limitation to the PC of a diagnostic test. We believe that our general rulemaking authority under sections 1102(a) and 1871(a) of the Act provides us with authority to effectuate fully the Congress’s intent in enacting section 1842(n)(1) the Act to remove the profit incentive for ordering unnecessary diagnostic tests. As we indicated in the preamble to the CY 2008 PFS final rule 436

CMS-1403-FC with comment period, the profit incentive to order unnecessary diagnostic tests remains if the billing physician or other supplier may markup the PC of the test (72 FR 66315). Moreover, and as also discussed in the preamble of the CY 2008 PFS final rule with comment period, section 1842(b)(6) of the Act authorizes us, but does not command us, to allow reassignment of physician services, including the PC of a diagnostic test (72 FR 66309). At this time, we are not prohibiting reassignment of PCs and instead requiring direct billing, but we are imposing restrictions on the reassignment of PCs. That is, a PC that is reassigned by the performing physician to the billing physician or other supplier that ordered the PC may not be marked up by the billing physician or other supplier, unless the performing physician shares a practice with the billing physician or other supplier. If a physician or other supplier that orders a PC does not find that billing for the PC under an arrangement that is subject to the anti-markup provisions is profitable or financially worthwhile, that physician or other supplier is free to not accept reassignment and instead have the performing physician or other supplier bill directly for the PC. 437

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

with comment period, the profit incentive to order<br />

unnecessary diagnostic tests remains if the billing<br />

physician or other supplier may markup the PC of the test<br />

(72 FR 66315). Moreover, and as also discussed in the<br />

preamble of the CY 2008 PFS final rule with comment period,<br />

section 1842(b)(6) of the Act authorizes us, but does not<br />

command us, to allow reassignment of physician services,<br />

including the PC of a diagnostic test (72 FR 66309). At<br />

this time, we are not prohibiting reassignment of PCs and<br />

instead requiring direct billing, but we are imposing<br />

restrictions on the reassignment of PCs. That is, a PC<br />

that is reassigned by the performing physician to the<br />

billing physician or other supplier that ordered the PC may<br />

not be marked up by the billing physician or other<br />

supplier, unless the performing physician shares a practice<br />

with the billing physician or other supplier. If a<br />

physician or other supplier that orders a PC does not find<br />

that billing for the PC under an arrangement that is<br />

subject to the anti-markup provisions is profitable or<br />

financially worthwhile, that physician or other supplier is<br />

free to not accept reassignment and instead have the<br />

performing physician or other supplier bill directly for<br />

the PC.<br />

437

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!