19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

space in which the ordering physician performs<br />

substantially the full range of patient care services that<br />

the ordering physician provides generally). We are adding<br />

to Alternative 2 the requirement, with respect to the TC,<br />

that the physician supervising the TC be an owner,<br />

employee, or independent contractor of the billing<br />

physician or other supplier, and, with respect to the PC,<br />

that the physician performing the PC be an employee or<br />

independent contractor of the billing physician or other<br />

supplier. We are doing this in order to simplify our rules<br />

and to avoid having a separate basis for imposing an anti-<br />

markup payment limitation for TCs supervised and PCs<br />

performed by outside suppliers. We explain our rationale<br />

for this change in the next paragraph.<br />

We are not finalizing a definition of outside<br />

supplier, and instead we are deleting references to a<br />

“purc<strong>has</strong>ed” test or interpretation in §414.50 because they<br />

are unnecessary, as explained below. We note that section<br />

1842(n)(1) of the Act requires us to impose an anti-markup<br />

payment limitation on diagnostic tests that are performed<br />

or supervised by a physician who does not share a practice<br />

with the billing physician or other supplier.<br />

Traditionally, we have interpreted section 1842(n)(1) of<br />

the Act as applying to purc<strong>has</strong>ed TCs from an outside<br />

427

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!