Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC similar arrangements), provided that the performing physician is not furnishing more than 25 percent of his or her professional services as a locum tenens physician (or in some other capacity, such as a part-time physician for another billing group or moonlighting at a hospital). We are also retaining the present site-of-service approach to determining whether a physician “shares a practice” with the billing physician or other supplier. This approach was reproposed as Alternative 2, with a proposed clarification that diagnostic testing performed in the “same building” (as defined at §411.351) in which the “office of the billing physician or other supplier” is located would not be subject to the anti-markup provisions (provided that the testing was not purchased from an outside supplier). We are adopting this clarification, but deleting the references to purchased TCs and PCs from §414.50, for the reasons explained below. We are also adopting certain proposed clarifications and definitions. Specifically, a physician or other supplier may have more than one “office of the billing physician or other supplier,” and the “office of the billing physician or other supplier” is defined as space in which the ordering physician or other ordering supplier regularly furnishes care (and with respect to physician organizations, is the 426
CMS-1403-FC space in which the ordering physician performs substantially the full range of patient care services that the ordering physician provides generally). We are adding to Alternative 2 the requirement, with respect to the TC, that the physician supervising the TC be an owner, employee, or independent contractor of the billing physician or other supplier, and, with respect to the PC, that the physician performing the PC be an employee or independent contractor of the billing physician or other supplier. We are doing this in order to simplify our rules and to avoid having a separate basis for imposing an anti- markup payment limitation for TCs supervised and PCs performed by outside suppliers. We explain our rationale for this change in the next paragraph. We are not finalizing a definition of outside supplier, and instead we are deleting references to a “purchased” test or interpretation in §414.50 because they are unnecessary, as explained below. We note that section 1842(n)(1) of the Act requires us to impose an anti-markup payment limitation on diagnostic tests that are performed or supervised by a physician who does not share a practice with the billing physician or other supplier. Traditionally, we have interpreted section 1842(n)(1) of the Act as applying to purchased TCs from an outside 427
- Page 375 and 376: CMS-1403-FC 3. CORF Conditions of P
- Page 377 and 378: CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed
- Page 379 and 380: CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed
- Page 381 and 382: CMS-1403-FC The following is a summ
- Page 383 and 384: CMS-1403-FC We are not making any c
- Page 385 and 386: CMS-1403-FC N. Physician Self-Refer
- Page 387 and 388: CMS-1403-FC arrangements, and the l
- Page 389 and 390: CMS-1403-FC below are related to ea
- Page 391 and 392: CMS-1403-FC clinical practice. With
- Page 393 and 394: CMS-1403-FC In the CY 2009 PFS prop
- Page 395 and 396: CMS-1403-FC would be outside the sc
- Page 397 and 398: CMS-1403-FC reflect objective quali
- Page 399 and 400: CMS-1403-FC quality resulting from
- Page 401 and 402: CMS-1403-FC payments should be reas
- Page 403 and 404: CMS-1403-FC changes in referral pat
- Page 405 and 406: CMS-1403-FC the alternative, we pro
- Page 407 and 408: CMS-1403-FC finalize this condition
- Page 409 and 410: CMS-1403-FC and “quality maintena
- Page 411 and 412: CMS-1403-FC date. We seek comments
- Page 413 and 414: CMS-1403-FC existing exceptions to
- Page 415 and 416: CMS-1403-FC our general rulemaking
- Page 417 and 418: CMS-1403-FC these approaches. We pr
- Page 419 and 420: CMS-1403-FC building in which the b
- Page 421 and 422: CMS-1403-FC were concerned that thi
- Page 423 and 424: CMS-1403-FC supplier will be subjec
- Page 425: CMS-1403-FC numerical test for the
- Page 429 and 430: CMS-1403-FC disadvantage nonproblem
- Page 431 and 432: CMS-1403-FC would be simpler to not
- Page 433 and 434: CMS-1403-FC IDTF standards in §410
- Page 435 and 436: CMS-1403-FC that rule, the Governme
- Page 437 and 438: CMS-1403-FC with comment period, th
- Page 439 and 440: CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act,
- Page 441 and 442: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 443 and 444: CMS-1403-FC her group practice woul
- Page 445 and 446: CMS-1403-FC A commenter representin
- Page 447 and 448: CMS-1403-FC tenens arrangements cou
- Page 449 and 450: CMS-1403-FC other supplier. We are
- Page 451 and 452: CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or
- Page 453 and 454: CMS-1403-FC patients. According to
- Page 455 and 456: CMS-1403-FC from sharing a practice
- Page 457 and 458: CMS-1403-FC Group A orders the TC a
- Page 459 and 460: CMS-1403-FC physicians the flexibil
- Page 461 and 462: CMS-1403-FC Response: We recognize
- Page 463 and 464: CMS-1403-FC Response: Because the d
- Page 465 and 466: CMS-1403-FC limited by the proposed
- Page 467 and 468: CMS-1403-FC Response: With respect
- Page 469 and 470: CMS-1403-FC to focus on the medical
- Page 471 and 472: CMS-1403-FC service” approach bec
- Page 473 and 474: CMS-1403-FC have the right to recei
- Page 475 and 476: CMS-1403-FC 2 approach finalized he
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
similar arrangements), provided that the performing<br />
physician is not furnishing more than 25 percent of his or<br />
her professional services as a locum tenens physician (or<br />
in some other capacity, such as a part-time physician for<br />
another billing group or moonlighting at a hospital).<br />
We are also retaining the present site-of-service<br />
approach to determining whether a physician “shares a<br />
practice” with the billing physician or other supplier.<br />
<strong>This</strong> approach was reproposed as Alternative 2, with a<br />
proposed clarification that diagnostic testing performed in<br />
the “same building” (as defined at §411.351) in which the<br />
“office of the billing physician or other supplier” is<br />
located would not be subject to the anti-markup provisions<br />
(provided that the testing was not purc<strong>has</strong>ed from an<br />
outside supplier). We are adopting this clarification, but<br />
deleting the references to purc<strong>has</strong>ed TCs and PCs from<br />
§414.50, for the reasons explained below. We are also<br />
adopting certain proposed clarifications and definitions.<br />
Specifically, a physician or other supplier may have more<br />
than one “office of the billing physician or other<br />
supplier,” and the “office of the billing physician or<br />
other supplier” is defined as space in which the ordering<br />
physician or other ordering supplier regularly furnishes<br />
care (and with respect to physician organizations, is the<br />
426