Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act. In light of this proposal, we also requested comments on how to consider locum tenens and other arrangements under which a physician provides occasional services outside of his or her physician organization, as we recognized that circumstances may exist under which it is beneficial or necessary for a physician to provide diagnostic testing services to more than one physician practice. We proposed a second alternative proposal, which we designate here as “Alternative 2,” which would maintain much of the current regulation text, and its “site-of- service” approach to determining whether a physician “shares a practice” with the billing physician or other supplier, that was finalized in the CY 2008 PFS final rule with comment period. In other words, we reproposed to apply the anti-markup payment limitation to non-purchased TCs and PCs that are performed outside the office of the billing physician or other supplier. We also solicited comments on whether this is the best anti-markup approach or whether we should employ a different approach. Specifically, in Alternative 2, we proposed to amend §414.50 to: (1) clarify that the “office of the billing physician or other supplier” includes space in which diagnostic testing is performed that is located in the same 418
CMS-1403-FC building in which the billing physician or other supplier regularly furnishes patient care (and to make two other revisions to the definition); (2) clarify that, with respect to TCs, the anti-markup provision applies if the TC is either conducted or supervised outside the office of the billing physician or other supplier; (3) clarify when we consider the TC of a diagnostic test to be purchased from an outside supplier; (4) clarify that, for purposes of applying the payment limitation in §414.50(a)(1)(i) only, with respect to the TC, the “performing supplier” is the physician who supervised the TC and, with respect to the PC, the "performing supplier" is the physician who performed the PC; and (5) include an exception for diagnostic tests ordered by a physician in a physician organization (as defined at §411.351) that does not have any owners who have the right to receive profit distributions. Finally, we solicited comments on how to define "net charge" and on whether we should delay beyond January 1, 2009, the application of the revisions made by the CY 2008 PFS final rule with comment period, or the proposed revisions (to the extent they are finalized), or both. We received numerous comments in response to the proposals related to the anti-markup provisions. Some 419
- Page 367 and 368: CMS-1403-FC risk-taking behaviors,
- Page 369 and 370: CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed
- Page 371 and 372: CMS-1403-FC commenter stated that o
- Page 373 and 374: CMS-1403-FC psychological services
- Page 375 and 376: CMS-1403-FC 3. CORF Conditions of P
- Page 377 and 378: CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed
- Page 379 and 380: CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed
- Page 381 and 382: CMS-1403-FC The following is a summ
- Page 383 and 384: CMS-1403-FC We are not making any c
- Page 385 and 386: CMS-1403-FC N. Physician Self-Refer
- Page 387 and 388: CMS-1403-FC arrangements, and the l
- Page 389 and 390: CMS-1403-FC below are related to ea
- Page 391 and 392: CMS-1403-FC clinical practice. With
- Page 393 and 394: CMS-1403-FC In the CY 2009 PFS prop
- Page 395 and 396: CMS-1403-FC would be outside the sc
- Page 397 and 398: CMS-1403-FC reflect objective quali
- Page 399 and 400: CMS-1403-FC quality resulting from
- Page 401 and 402: CMS-1403-FC payments should be reas
- Page 403 and 404: CMS-1403-FC changes in referral pat
- Page 405 and 406: CMS-1403-FC the alternative, we pro
- Page 407 and 408: CMS-1403-FC finalize this condition
- Page 409 and 410: CMS-1403-FC and “quality maintena
- Page 411 and 412: CMS-1403-FC date. We seek comments
- Page 413 and 414: CMS-1403-FC existing exceptions to
- Page 415 and 416: CMS-1403-FC our general rulemaking
- Page 417: CMS-1403-FC these approaches. We pr
- Page 421 and 422: CMS-1403-FC were concerned that thi
- Page 423 and 424: CMS-1403-FC supplier will be subjec
- Page 425 and 426: CMS-1403-FC numerical test for the
- Page 427 and 428: CMS-1403-FC space in which the orde
- Page 429 and 430: CMS-1403-FC disadvantage nonproblem
- Page 431 and 432: CMS-1403-FC would be simpler to not
- Page 433 and 434: CMS-1403-FC IDTF standards in §410
- Page 435 and 436: CMS-1403-FC that rule, the Governme
- Page 437 and 438: CMS-1403-FC with comment period, th
- Page 439 and 440: CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act,
- Page 441 and 442: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 443 and 444: CMS-1403-FC her group practice woul
- Page 445 and 446: CMS-1403-FC A commenter representin
- Page 447 and 448: CMS-1403-FC tenens arrangements cou
- Page 449 and 450: CMS-1403-FC other supplier. We are
- Page 451 and 452: CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or
- Page 453 and 454: CMS-1403-FC patients. According to
- Page 455 and 456: CMS-1403-FC from sharing a practice
- Page 457 and 458: CMS-1403-FC Group A orders the TC a
- Page 459 and 460: CMS-1403-FC physicians the flexibil
- Page 461 and 462: CMS-1403-FC Response: We recognize
- Page 463 and 464: CMS-1403-FC Response: Because the d
- Page 465 and 466: CMS-1403-FC limited by the proposed
- Page 467 and 468: CMS-1403-FC Response: With respect
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
1842(n)(1) of the Act. In light of this proposal, we also<br />
requested comments on how to consider locum tenens and<br />
other arrangements under which a physician provides<br />
occasional services outside of his or her physician<br />
organization, as we recognized that circumstances may exist<br />
under which it is beneficial or necessary for a physician<br />
to provide diagnostic testing services to more than one<br />
physician practice.<br />
We proposed a second alternative proposal, which we<br />
designate here as “Alternative 2,” which would maintain<br />
much of the current regulation text, and its “site-of-<br />
service” approach to determining whether a physician<br />
“shares a practice” with the billing physician or other<br />
supplier, that was finalized in the CY 2008 PFS final rule<br />
with comment period. In other words, we reproposed to<br />
apply the anti-markup payment limitation to non-purc<strong>has</strong>ed<br />
TCs and PCs that are performed outside the office of the<br />
billing physician or other supplier. We also solicited<br />
comments on whether this is the best anti-markup approach<br />
or whether we should employ a different approach.<br />
Specifically, in Alternative 2, we proposed to amend<br />
§414.50 to: (1) clarify that the “office of the billing<br />
physician or other supplier” includes space in which<br />
diagnostic testing is performed that is located in the same<br />
418