19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

maintenance of patient care quality (as opposed to the<br />

improvement of patient care quality); [39] whether payments<br />

should be permitted for the achievement of intermediate<br />

targets for patient care quality and how intermediate<br />

targets should be defined and measured; [40] what types of<br />

medical evidence should support quality measures, and how<br />

we can ensure that quality measures are supported by<br />

credible medical evidence; and [41] whether measures must<br />

have some relation to the patient populations and practices<br />

at the hospital and, if so, what the relation should be,<br />

and, if not, how we could protect against programs that are<br />

structured to reward physicians for reaching subjective or<br />

limited goals that do not substantially benefit the<br />

hospital’s patients.<br />

We seek additional information on how parties measure<br />

patient care quality and determine appropriate payment<br />

amounts for the achievement of targets for patient care<br />

quality measures. For example, we request comments on:<br />

[42] how quality improvement should be measured, including<br />

how a baseline (that is, starting point) should be set from<br />

which to measure the improvement, how recent the baseline<br />

should be, and whether the targets should reflect regional<br />

data, national data, or some other data; [43] whether we<br />

should recognize a difference between “quality improvement”<br />

408

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!