Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC physicians were not participating in the incentive payment or shared savings program under which the payment is made. We reiterate our concern that payments made to physician organizations with nonparticipating physicians could be used to reward such nonparticipating physicians for their referrals. Many commenters objected to the strict limitations on the parties to whom a hospital may make a payment under an incentive payment or shared savings program. Commenters generally urged greater flexibility in the distribution of payments. We are seeking here specific information regarding [28] conditions that could be imposed to ensure no risk of program or patient abuse including, for example, conditions on the use and distribution of payments made to physician organizations on behalf of participating physicians. (3) Costs savings for shared savings programs With respect to shared savings programs, we proposed various methods and sought comments on other methods for limiting or capping the total amount of cost savings available under the program. We proposed a flat, 50 percent limit on the amount of cost savings eligible for sharing with participating physicians, and also proposed requiring rebasing of the baseline statistics against which reduction in waste and cost savings would be measured. In 404
CMS-1403-FC the alternative, we proposed a surrogate method of capping total available payments that would be actuarially equivalent to a 50 percent cap with annual rebasing of baseline statistics. Many commenters responded that we should impose no limits on how a hospital determines the amount available for shared savings payments, while other commenters objected to the 50 percent cap and/or the rebasing requirement. As we noted in the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule and above, our goal is to finalize an exception (or exceptions) that provide sufficient flexibility for hospitals to structure and implement a variety of nonabusive incentive payment and shared savings programs. We are seeking comments that specifically address: [29] what safeguards we could include in an exception if we do not include a cap on the total amount of cost savings available for distribution to participating physicians; [30] what safeguards we could include in an exception to ensure that physicians are not paid for achieving performance measures they achieved in prior periods of the program if we do not require rebasing of the baseline against which reductions in waste or costs are measures; [31] whether it is appropriate to permit payments for continued achievement (or maintenance) of performance measures, waste reduction or cost savings and, if so, what 405
- Page 353 and 354: CMS-1403-FC Version 10.2 or higher)
- Page 355 and 356: CMS-1403-FC proposed January 2009 c
- Page 357 and 358: CMS-1403-FC L. Comprehensive Outpat
- Page 359 and 360: CMS-1403-FC examination. In order t
- Page 361 and 362: CMS-1403-FC qualifications for HHAs
- Page 363 and 364: CMS-1403-FC distinction in the lice
- Page 365 and 366: CMS-1403-FC (2) Have successfully c
- Page 367 and 368: CMS-1403-FC risk-taking behaviors,
- Page 369 and 370: CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed
- Page 371 and 372: CMS-1403-FC commenter stated that o
- Page 373 and 374: CMS-1403-FC psychological services
- Page 375 and 376: CMS-1403-FC 3. CORF Conditions of P
- Page 377 and 378: CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed
- Page 379 and 380: CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed
- Page 381 and 382: CMS-1403-FC The following is a summ
- Page 383 and 384: CMS-1403-FC We are not making any c
- Page 385 and 386: CMS-1403-FC N. Physician Self-Refer
- Page 387 and 388: CMS-1403-FC arrangements, and the l
- Page 389 and 390: CMS-1403-FC below are related to ea
- Page 391 and 392: CMS-1403-FC clinical practice. With
- Page 393 and 394: CMS-1403-FC In the CY 2009 PFS prop
- Page 395 and 396: CMS-1403-FC would be outside the sc
- Page 397 and 398: CMS-1403-FC reflect objective quali
- Page 399 and 400: CMS-1403-FC quality resulting from
- Page 401 and 402: CMS-1403-FC payments should be reas
- Page 403: CMS-1403-FC changes in referral pat
- Page 407 and 408: CMS-1403-FC finalize this condition
- Page 409 and 410: CMS-1403-FC and “quality maintena
- Page 411 and 412: CMS-1403-FC date. We seek comments
- Page 413 and 414: CMS-1403-FC existing exceptions to
- Page 415 and 416: CMS-1403-FC our general rulemaking
- Page 417 and 418: CMS-1403-FC these approaches. We pr
- Page 419 and 420: CMS-1403-FC building in which the b
- Page 421 and 422: CMS-1403-FC were concerned that thi
- Page 423 and 424: CMS-1403-FC supplier will be subjec
- Page 425 and 426: CMS-1403-FC numerical test for the
- Page 427 and 428: CMS-1403-FC space in which the orde
- Page 429 and 430: CMS-1403-FC disadvantage nonproblem
- Page 431 and 432: CMS-1403-FC would be simpler to not
- Page 433 and 434: CMS-1403-FC IDTF standards in §410
- Page 435 and 436: CMS-1403-FC that rule, the Governme
- Page 437 and 438: CMS-1403-FC with comment period, th
- Page 439 and 440: CMS-1403-FC 1842(n)(1) of the Act,
- Page 441 and 442: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 443 and 444: CMS-1403-FC her group practice woul
- Page 445 and 446: CMS-1403-FC A commenter representin
- Page 447 and 448: CMS-1403-FC tenens arrangements cou
- Page 449 and 450: CMS-1403-FC other supplier. We are
- Page 451 and 452: CMS-1403-FC on pathology reports or
- Page 453 and 454: CMS-1403-FC patients. According to
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
physicians were not participating in the incentive payment<br />
or shared savings program under which the payment is made.<br />
We reiterate our concern that payments made to physician<br />
organizations with nonparticipating physicians could be<br />
used to reward such nonparticipating physicians for their<br />
referrals. Many commenters objected to the strict<br />
limitations on the parties to whom a hospital may make a<br />
payment under an incentive payment or shared savings<br />
program. Commenters generally urged greater flexibility in<br />
the distribution of payments. We are seeking here specific<br />
information regarding [28] conditions that could be imposed<br />
to ensure no risk of program or patient abuse including,<br />
for example, conditions on the use and distribution of<br />
payments made to physician organizations on behalf of<br />
participating physicians.<br />
(3) Costs savings for shared savings programs<br />
With respect to shared savings programs, we proposed<br />
various methods and sought comments on other methods for<br />
limiting or capping the total amount of cost savings<br />
available under the program. We proposed a flat,<br />
50 percent limit on the amount of cost savings eligible for<br />
sharing with participating physicians, and also proposed<br />
requiring rebasing of the baseline statistics against which<br />
reduction in waste and cost savings would be measured. In<br />
404