Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC physicians were not participating in the incentive payment or shared savings program under which the payment is made. We reiterate our concern that payments made to physician organizations with nonparticipating physicians could be used to reward such nonparticipating physicians for their referrals. Many commenters objected to the strict limitations on the parties to whom a hospital may make a payment under an incentive payment or shared savings program. Commenters generally urged greater flexibility in the distribution of payments. We are seeking here specific information regarding [28] conditions that could be imposed to ensure no risk of program or patient abuse including, for example, conditions on the use and distribution of payments made to physician organizations on behalf of participating physicians. (3) Costs savings for shared savings programs With respect to shared savings programs, we proposed various methods and sought comments on other methods for limiting or capping the total amount of cost savings available under the program. We proposed a flat, 50 percent limit on the amount of cost savings eligible for sharing with participating physicians, and also proposed requiring rebasing of the baseline statistics against which reduction in waste and cost savings would be measured. In 404

CMS-1403-FC the alternative, we proposed a surrogate method of capping total available payments that would be actuarially equivalent to a 50 percent cap with annual rebasing of baseline statistics. Many commenters responded that we should impose no limits on how a hospital determines the amount available for shared savings payments, while other commenters objected to the 50 percent cap and/or the rebasing requirement. As we noted in the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule and above, our goal is to finalize an exception (or exceptions) that provide sufficient flexibility for hospitals to structure and implement a variety of nonabusive incentive payment and shared savings programs. We are seeking comments that specifically address: [29] what safeguards we could include in an exception if we do not include a cap on the total amount of cost savings available for distribution to participating physicians; [30] what safeguards we could include in an exception to ensure that physicians are not paid for achieving performance measures they achieved in prior periods of the program if we do not require rebasing of the baseline against which reductions in waste or costs are measures; [31] whether it is appropriate to permit payments for continued achievement (or maintenance) of performance measures, waste reduction or cost savings and, if so, what 405

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

physicians were not participating in the incentive payment<br />

or shared savings program under which the payment is made.<br />

We reiterate our concern that payments made to physician<br />

organizations with nonparticipating physicians could be<br />

used to reward such nonparticipating physicians for their<br />

referrals. Many commenters objected to the strict<br />

limitations on the parties to whom a hospital may make a<br />

payment under an incentive payment or shared savings<br />

program. Commenters generally urged greater flexibility in<br />

the distribution of payments. We are seeking here specific<br />

information regarding [28] conditions that could be imposed<br />

to ensure no risk of program or patient abuse including,<br />

for example, conditions on the use and distribution of<br />

payments made to physician organizations on behalf of<br />

participating physicians.<br />

(3) Costs savings for shared savings programs<br />

With respect to shared savings programs, we proposed<br />

various methods and sought comments on other methods for<br />

limiting or capping the total amount of cost savings<br />

available under the program. We proposed a flat,<br />

50 percent limit on the amount of cost savings eligible for<br />

sharing with participating physicians, and also proposed<br />

requiring rebasing of the baseline statistics against which<br />

reduction in waste and cost savings would be measured. In<br />

404

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!