19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

payments should be reasonably related to the measure that<br />

is achieved and, if so, how a reasonable relationship<br />

should be determined, and, if not, how we could protect<br />

against excessive payments that might induce referrals. In<br />

this regard, we are interested in comments addressing [22]<br />

methods for protecting against excessive payments to<br />

referring physicians who participate in the program but may<br />

contribute little or no work or expertise to the program.<br />

We are further interested in comments on [23] the types of<br />

physicians who should be protected participants and what it<br />

should mean to be a “participating” physician. Finally, we<br />

are interested in comments addressing [24] the concept of<br />

restricting physicians from receiving payments for<br />

previously achieved cost savings or for meeting quality<br />

improvement goals that are, or have become over time,<br />

standard practice (for example, we are concerned about<br />

payments that amount to little more than supplemental<br />

payments to physicians to do nothing more than what they<br />

are already doing) (73 FR 38555 through 38556).<br />

In the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule, as described above,<br />

we proposed that payments to physicians be made (whether<br />

directly to the physician or to his or her qualifying<br />

physician organization) on a per capita basis. We also<br />

solicited comments that would “outline alternate approaches<br />

401

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!