19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

of program or patient abuse as traditional gainsharing<br />

programs or shared savings programs. We are seeking<br />

comments that [3] identify with specificity which<br />

conditions should be made applicable to incentive payment<br />

programs (and why), [4] identify which conditions need not<br />

or should not be made applicable to incentive payment<br />

programs (and why), and [5] indicate why it would not be<br />

necessary to impose the same safeguards against program or<br />

patient abuse on both types of programs. For example, we<br />

seek comments on [6] whether a program involving cost<br />

savings measures that also improve quality should be<br />

treated as an incentive payment or shared savings program.<br />

ii. Risk of Program or Patient Abuse<br />

As noted above, several commenters questioned our<br />

ability to promulgate an exception for shared savings<br />

programs that satisfies the mandate under section<br />

1877(b)(4) of the Act that any exception issued using that<br />

authority pose no risk of program or patient abuse. The<br />

commenters asserted that, because gainsharing implicates<br />

sections 1128A(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act, commonly<br />

referred to as the Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP) statute,<br />

any exception to the physician self-referral law for<br />

incentive payment and shared savings programs would<br />

necessarily pose a risk of program or patient abuse and<br />

394

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!