19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

To better understand and address the variety of<br />

incentive payment and shared savings programs that exist in<br />

the industry or that parties would like to implement, we<br />

are interested in detailed descriptions of incentive<br />

payment programs and shared savings programs that include<br />

specific descriptions of the structure and operations of<br />

the programs and payments. We are also interested in views<br />

addressing the likely evolution of these programs.<br />

b. Background: Incentive Payment and Shared Savings<br />

Programs<br />

As we discussed in both the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule,<br />

and the FY 2009 IPPS proposed rule, the term “gainsharing”<br />

is commonly used to describe certain programs that seek to<br />

align physician behavior with the goals of a hospital by<br />

rewarding physicians for reaching predetermined performance<br />

outcomes. Several types of programs exist (including, but<br />

not limited to, gainsharing) for the purpose of achieving<br />

quality standards, generating cost savings, and reducing<br />

waste. We refer to these programs as “incentive payment”<br />

and “shared savings” programs. Within the category of<br />

“incentive payment” programs, we include P4P, also known as<br />

quality-based purc<strong>has</strong>ing, and other quality-focused<br />

programs that do not involve the sharing of cost savings<br />

from the reduction of waste or changes in administrative or<br />

390

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!