Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC in the proposed regulation. However, each alone would not be the single issue in determining appropriateness as a sole means for approving an extension location. We have decided to leave it to the rehabilitation agency to prove to the State survey agency that the rehabilitation agency is close enough to the extension location to provide supervision of staff during its hours of operation. Supervision of the extension location staff must be adequate to support the care needs of the patients. We believe that our proposed definition for an extension location is adequate, as it has been used successfully in our State Operations Manual for other provider types. We are not making any changes to our proposed revisions based on public comments, and are finalizing them as proposed. 5. Emergency Care We proposed to revise §485.711(c), Standard: Emergency care, to reflect current medical practice. We proposed to remove the requirement that the rehabilitation agency provide for one or more doctors of medicine or osteopathy to be available on call to furnish necessary medical care in case of an emergency. We do not believe that the patients serviced by rehabilitation agencies regularly experience medical emergencies that necessitate the retention of an on-call physician. 378
CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed that each rehabilitation agency establish procedures to be followed by personnel in an emergency that cover immediate care of the patient, persons to be notified, and reports to be prepared. The following is a summary of the comments received concerning Emergency care and our responses. Comment: Most commenters concurred with our proposed changes to the emergency care standard. Specifically, the commenters supported our proposed elimination of the requirement that rehabilitation agencies retain a physician on call for emergencies. The commenters cited difficulty in recruiting physicians for this role, and stated that it is often impractical to contact a physician in the rare case of an emergency. One commenter also supported the revisions to the emergency provisions because they allow facilities to develop emergency care plans most appropriate for an individual facility’s location and patient population. Response: We thank the commenters for their support, and agree that these revisions will allow facilities to plan for, and respond to, emergency care situations in appropriate ways. As a result of the public comments, we are finalizing the provision as proposed with slight non- policy revisions for grammatical purposes. We are also 379
- Page 327 and 328: CMS-1403-FC Prescription Fill Statu
- Page 329 and 330: CMS-1403-FC dispensers to move towa
- Page 331 and 332: CMS-1403-FC Following the publicati
- Page 333 and 334: CMS-1403-FC does not respond to the
- Page 335 and 336: CMS-1403-FC facsimiles in all insta
- Page 337 and 338: CMS-1403-FC Similarly, other commen
- Page 339 and 340: CMS-1403-FC proposed rule's publica
- Page 341 and 342: CMS-1403-FC elimination of the comp
- Page 343 and 344: CMS-1403-FC exemption originally cr
- Page 345 and 346: CMS-1403-FC dispensers are not requ
- Page 347 and 348: CMS-1403-FC products, or, where upg
- Page 349 and 350: CMS-1403-FC take time to develop, a
- Page 351 and 352: CMS-1403-FC integrated this technol
- Page 353 and 354: CMS-1403-FC Version 10.2 or higher)
- Page 355 and 356: CMS-1403-FC proposed January 2009 c
- Page 357 and 358: CMS-1403-FC L. Comprehensive Outpat
- Page 359 and 360: CMS-1403-FC examination. In order t
- Page 361 and 362: CMS-1403-FC qualifications for HHAs
- Page 363 and 364: CMS-1403-FC distinction in the lice
- Page 365 and 366: CMS-1403-FC (2) Have successfully c
- Page 367 and 368: CMS-1403-FC risk-taking behaviors,
- Page 369 and 370: CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed
- Page 371 and 372: CMS-1403-FC commenter stated that o
- Page 373 and 374: CMS-1403-FC psychological services
- Page 375 and 376: CMS-1403-FC 3. CORF Conditions of P
- Page 377: CMS-1403-FC Therefore, we proposed
- Page 381 and 382: CMS-1403-FC The following is a summ
- Page 383 and 384: CMS-1403-FC We are not making any c
- Page 385 and 386: CMS-1403-FC N. Physician Self-Refer
- Page 387 and 388: CMS-1403-FC arrangements, and the l
- Page 389 and 390: CMS-1403-FC below are related to ea
- Page 391 and 392: CMS-1403-FC clinical practice. With
- Page 393 and 394: CMS-1403-FC In the CY 2009 PFS prop
- Page 395 and 396: CMS-1403-FC would be outside the sc
- Page 397 and 398: CMS-1403-FC reflect objective quali
- Page 399 and 400: CMS-1403-FC quality resulting from
- Page 401 and 402: CMS-1403-FC payments should be reas
- Page 403 and 404: CMS-1403-FC changes in referral pat
- Page 405 and 406: CMS-1403-FC the alternative, we pro
- Page 407 and 408: CMS-1403-FC finalize this condition
- Page 409 and 410: CMS-1403-FC and “quality maintena
- Page 411 and 412: CMS-1403-FC date. We seek comments
- Page 413 and 414: CMS-1403-FC existing exceptions to
- Page 415 and 416: CMS-1403-FC our general rulemaking
- Page 417 and 418: CMS-1403-FC these approaches. We pr
- Page 419 and 420: CMS-1403-FC building in which the b
- Page 421 and 422: CMS-1403-FC were concerned that thi
- Page 423 and 424: CMS-1403-FC supplier will be subjec
- Page 425 and 426: CMS-1403-FC numerical test for the
- Page 427 and 428: CMS-1403-FC space in which the orde
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
in the proposed regulation. However, each alone would not<br />
be the single issue in determining appropriateness as a sole<br />
means for approving an extension location. We have decided<br />
to leave it to the rehabilitation agency to prove to the<br />
State survey agency that the rehabilitation agency is close<br />
enough to the extension location to provide supervision of<br />
staff during its hours of operation. Supervision of the<br />
extension location staff must be adequate to support the<br />
care needs of the patients. We believe that our proposed<br />
definition for an extension location is adequate, as it <strong>has</strong><br />
<strong>been</strong> used successfully in our State Operations Manual for<br />
other provider types. We are not making any changes to our<br />
proposed revisions based on public comments, and are<br />
finalizing them as proposed.<br />
5. Emergency Care<br />
We proposed to revise §485.711(c), Standard: Emergency<br />
care, to reflect current medical practice. We proposed to<br />
remove the requirement that the rehabilitation agency<br />
provide for one or more doctors of medicine or osteopathy<br />
to be available on call to furnish necessary medical care<br />
in case of an emergency. We do not believe that the<br />
patients serviced by rehabilitation agencies regularly<br />
experience medical emergencies that necessitate the<br />
retention of an on-call physician.<br />
378