19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

distinction in the license as to whether the individual<br />

holds a credential of CRT or RRT. They are both licensed<br />

as “respiratory therapists.” To the best of AARC’s<br />

knowledge, there are only six States that require a<br />

separate license for a CRT or a RRT. AARC recommended that<br />

the proposed definition be revised.<br />

Since <strong>CMS</strong> uses the term “respiratory therapist” in<br />

other regulatory provisions and manual instructions where<br />

applicable, AARC recommended that <strong>CMS</strong> delete the word<br />

“registered” from the proposed definition. <strong>This</strong> would also<br />

be consistent with the terms “physical therapist” and<br />

“occupational therapist” used to define qualified personnel<br />

in those professions.<br />

AARC also believes that <strong>CMS</strong> can ensure that only<br />

registered respiratory therapists, and not individuals<br />

holding only the CRT, meet the personnel qualifications by<br />

revising the curriculum requirements to require that<br />

respiratory therapists have passed the registry examination<br />

administered by the NBRC. AARC also noted that the name of<br />

the Board administering the certification and registry<br />

exams is the NBRC, not the National Board for Respiratory<br />

Therapy, Inc.<br />

Response: We thank the commenters for their support<br />

of our proposed revisions. We believe that the comments<br />

363

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!