Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC not maintain the NPI documentation for each service, but the provider or supplier must maintain sufficient documentation to identify the individual who ordered or referred the beneficiary for their services. In addition, upon review, CMS or our contractor may validate the ordering/referring documentation maintained by the billing provider or supplier with the individual practitioner who ordered/ referred the beneficiary for these services. Comment: One commenter recommends that CMS defer to the judgment of the State boards of pharmacy regarding the length of record retention, and also allow offsite electronic storage of ordering and referring records. Response: We appreciate the importance of the requirements of State boards of pharmacy; however, we uphold that Medicare is a national program and it is necessary to establish national standards for maintaining the ordering and referring record retention period. We believe that this approach will lead to consistency. Further, the provisions of the final rule do not preclude offsite or electronic storage as long as these records are readily accessible and retrievable. Comment: One commenter proposes CMS to abandon its proposal for the 10-year record retention period and allow 314
CMS-1403-FC pharmacies to follow record retention requirements under State law. Response: We appreciate the importance of the requirements of State boards of pharmacy, however we uphold that Medicare is a national program and it is necessary to establish national standards for maintaining the ordering and referring record retention period. We believe that this approach will lead to CMS consistency. While we are not changing our record retention policy to account for different State pharmacy laws, we are revising the proposed 10-year record retention policy and establishing an ordering and referring record retention period as 7 years from the date of service Comment: One commenter believes that pharmacies should be allowed to maintain their hard-copy records offsite electronically after a certain time. Response: The provisions of the final rule do not preclude offsite or electronic storage as long as these records are readily accessible and retrievable. Comment: Several commenters recommended that pharmacies should maintain the prescription record in written form for the greater of 3 years or the requirements in State law, and then allow the prescription to be stored electronically for the remaining years. The commenter 315
- Page 263 and 264: CMS-1403-FC records faster and more
- Page 265 and 266: CMS-1403-FC In §424.521(a)(1), we
- Page 267 and 268: CMS-1403-FC practitioners with the
- Page 269 and 270: CMS-1403-FC In June 2002 and Novemb
- Page 271 and 272: CMS-1403-FC full implementation sch
- Page 273 and 274: CMS-1403-FC with billing agents, cl
- Page 275 and 276: CMS-1403-FC 2. Medicare Billing Pri
- Page 277 and 278: CMS-1403-FC The FPLP is a collectio
- Page 279 and 280: CMS-1403-FC continued enrollment to
- Page 281 and 282: CMS-1403-FC Federal Payment Levy Pr
- Page 283 and 284: CMS-1403-FC Consistent with existin
- Page 285 and 286: CMS-1403-FC facilitate the enrollme
- Page 287 and 288: CMS-1403-FC determination. Specific
- Page 289 and 290: CMS-1403-FC individual practitioner
- Page 291 and 292: CMS-1403-FC determines in February
- Page 293 and 294: CMS-1403-FC Management Manual (IOM
- Page 295 and 296: CMS-1403-FC Response: Based on thes
- Page 297 and 298: CMS-1403-FC or continues to meet th
- Page 299 and 300: CMS-1403-FC to identify and discipl
- Page 301 and 302: CMS-1403-FC Response: We disagree w
- Page 303 and 304: CMS-1403-FC save our severe penalti
- Page 305 and 306: CMS-1403-FC Response: We disagree w
- Page 307 and 308: CMS-1403-FC affords the supplier ap
- Page 309 and 310: CMS-1403-FC privileges and assess a
- Page 311 and 312: CMS-1403-FC §424.535(a)(10) that w
- Page 313: CMS-1403-FC documentation for 7 yea
- Page 317 and 318: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One commenter
- Page 319 and 320: CMS-1403-FC practitioners, includin
- Page 321 and 322: CMS-1403-FC that require a revoked
- Page 323 and 324: CMS-1403-FC provider and supplier e
- Page 325 and 326: CMS-1403-FC K. Amendment to the Exe
- Page 327 and 328: CMS-1403-FC Prescription Fill Statu
- Page 329 and 330: CMS-1403-FC dispensers to move towa
- Page 331 and 332: CMS-1403-FC Following the publicati
- Page 333 and 334: CMS-1403-FC does not respond to the
- Page 335 and 336: CMS-1403-FC facsimiles in all insta
- Page 337 and 338: CMS-1403-FC Similarly, other commen
- Page 339 and 340: CMS-1403-FC proposed rule's publica
- Page 341 and 342: CMS-1403-FC elimination of the comp
- Page 343 and 344: CMS-1403-FC exemption originally cr
- Page 345 and 346: CMS-1403-FC dispensers are not requ
- Page 347 and 348: CMS-1403-FC products, or, where upg
- Page 349 and 350: CMS-1403-FC take time to develop, a
- Page 351 and 352: CMS-1403-FC integrated this technol
- Page 353 and 354: CMS-1403-FC Version 10.2 or higher)
- Page 355 and 356: CMS-1403-FC proposed January 2009 c
- Page 357 and 358: CMS-1403-FC L. Comprehensive Outpat
- Page 359 and 360: CMS-1403-FC examination. In order t
- Page 361 and 362: CMS-1403-FC qualifications for HHAs
- Page 363 and 364: CMS-1403-FC distinction in the lice
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
not maintain the NPI <strong>document</strong>ation for each service, but<br />
the provider or supplier must maintain sufficient<br />
<strong>document</strong>ation to identify the individual who ordered or<br />
referred the beneficiary for their services. In addition,<br />
upon review, <strong>CMS</strong> or our contractor may validate the<br />
ordering/referring <strong>document</strong>ation maintained by the billing<br />
provider or supplier with the individual practitioner who<br />
ordered/ referred the beneficiary for these services.<br />
Comment: One commenter recommends that <strong>CMS</strong> defer to<br />
the judgment of the State boards of pharmacy regarding the<br />
length of record retention, and also allow offsite<br />
electronic storage of ordering and referring records.<br />
Response: We appreciate the importance of the<br />
requirements of State boards of pharmacy; however, we<br />
uphold that Medicare is a national program and it is<br />
necessary to establish national standards for maintaining<br />
the ordering and referring record retention period. We<br />
believe that this approach will lead to consistency.<br />
Further, the provisions of the final rule do not preclude<br />
offsite or electronic storage as long as these records are<br />
readily accessible and retrievable.<br />
Comment: One commenter proposes <strong>CMS</strong> to abandon its<br />
proposal for the 10-year record retention period and allow<br />
314