Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC believe that a final adverse action may preclude payment, and thus, establish an overpayment from the date of the adverse action. As such, we believe that physician and NPP organizations and individual practitioners should not be allowed to retain any reimbursement they receive after the final adverse action. In addition, we added the word “final” to the beginning of the term “adverse legal action” in the regulation text in §424.535 on overpayment. We define the term as a “final adverse action” in the definition section at §424.502 and want to be consistent with that definition. Also, we want to be consistent with our definition of this term in the Durable medical Equipment prosthetics Orthotics and Supplies surety bond rule (CMS-6006-F). Moreover, we want this term to be consistent with the definition of “final adverse action” found in section 221(g)(1)(A) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996. Finally, we believe that a final adverse action has occurred when the sanction is imposed and not when a supplier has exhausted all of the appeal rights associated with the action itself. We believe that it is essential that this type of change be reported in a timely manner (that is within 30 days). For example, if CMS or our designated contractor 290

CMS-1403-FC determines in February 2008 that a physician failed to notify Medicare about a final adverse action that occurred on June 30, 2007, that physician may be subject to an overpayment for all Medicare payments beginning June 30, 2007 and have their Medicare billing privileges revoked effective retroactively back to June 30, 2007 as well. Additionally, we proposed to add a requirement for change in location at §424.516(d)(1)(iii). Since a change in location may impact the amount of payment for services furnished by placing the physician and NPP organizations and individual practitioners into a new Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA). We believe that it is essential that physician and NPP organizations and individual practitioners report changes in practice location including those that impact the amount of payments they receive within a timely period (that is, 30 days). However, unlike a final adverse action, which may preclude all payments if reported, failure to report a change in practice location may impact the amount of payment, not whether a physician and NPP organizations and individual practitioners may be eligible to receive payments. Accordingly, we believe that failing to report changes in practice location would result in an overpayment for the difference in payment rates 291

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

believe that a final adverse action may preclude payment,<br />

and thus, establish an overpayment from the date of the<br />

adverse action. As such, we believe that physician and NPP<br />

organizations and individual practitioners should not be<br />

allowed to retain any reimbursement they receive after the<br />

final adverse action.<br />

In addition, we added the word “final” to the<br />

beginning of the term “adverse legal action” in the<br />

regulation text in §424.535 on overpayment. We define the<br />

term as a “final adverse action” in the definition section<br />

at §424.502 and want to be consistent with that definition.<br />

Also, we want to be consistent with our definition of this<br />

term in the Durable medical Equipment prosthetics Orthotics<br />

and Supplies surety bond rule (<strong>CMS</strong>-6006-F). Moreover, we<br />

want this term to be consistent with the definition of<br />

“final adverse action” found in section 221(g)(1)(A) of the<br />

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)<br />

of 1996. Finally, we believe that a final adverse action<br />

<strong>has</strong> occurred when the sanction is imposed and not when a<br />

supplier <strong>has</strong> exhausted all of the appeal rights associated<br />

with the action itself.<br />

We believe that it is essential that this type of<br />

change be reported in a timely manner (that is within<br />

30 days). For example, if <strong>CMS</strong> or our designated contractor<br />

290

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!