Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC Comment: One commenter recommended that we hold an open and thorough dialogue with its contractors and the provider community regarding the enrollment process as it currently stands and the problems encountered by all. Response: We believe that this issue is outside the scope of proposed rule and can not be addressed in this final rule. Comment: One commenter stated that they support CMS and the establishment of an electronic enrollment process but they do not believe it will address the provisions in the rule. Response: While we do not expect that Internet-based PECOS will remedy all provider enrollment processing issues, we do believe that Internet-based enrollment process will allow physicians and other providers and suppliers to reduce the time necessary to enroll or make a change in enrollment in the Medicare program. Comment: One commenter recommended that we establish streamlined and user-friendly procedures that will encourage high rates of physician participation in the Medicare program. Response: We appreciate this comment and believe that Internet-based PECOS will allow physicians and NPPs the ability to enroll or make changes in their enrollment 262

CMS-1403-FC records faster and more accurately than the paper-based enrollment process. Comment: One commenter commended CMS for PECOS as it will provide timely ease of used for enrollment as well as updating the enrollment record. Response: We appreciate this comment. Comment: One commenter requested that we consider modifying existing provider enrollment applications to include an attestation statement for which an applicant would attest to those certain requisite program requirements having been met prior to the filing of the application. Response: This recommendation is outside the scope of the proposed rule and can not be addressed in this final rule. Comment: One commenter stated that we should provide notice 14 days in advance of conducting onsite review and that reviews on Mondays should be avoided. Response: This comment is outside the scope of this proposed rule and can not be addressed in this final rule. Comment: One commenter urged that CMS and the NSC coordinate so that only a single onsite review would be required and the least disruptive to an operation. 263

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

records faster and more accurately than the paper-based<br />

enrollment process.<br />

Comment: One commenter commended <strong>CMS</strong> for PECOS as it<br />

will provide timely ease of used for enrollment as well as<br />

updating the enrollment record.<br />

Response: We appreciate this comment.<br />

Comment: One commenter requested that we consider<br />

modifying existing provider enrollment applications to<br />

include an attestation statement for which an applicant<br />

would attest to those certain requisite program<br />

requirements having <strong>been</strong> met prior to the filing of the<br />

application.<br />

Response: <strong>This</strong> recommendation is outside the scope of<br />

the proposed rule and can not be addressed in this final<br />

rule.<br />

Comment: One commenter stated that we should provide<br />

notice 14 days in advance of conducting onsite review and<br />

that reviews on Mondays should be avoided.<br />

Response: <strong>This</strong> comment is outside the scope of this<br />

proposed rule and can not be addressed in this final rule.<br />

Comment: One commenter urged that <strong>CMS</strong> and the NSC<br />

coordinate so that only a single onsite review would be<br />

required and the least disruptive to an operation.<br />

263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!