Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC technicality, forcing them to begin the application process all over again. Response: As stated above, to address the concern that enrollment applications are returned based on a technicality, we expect that physicians and NPPs using the Web process will significantly decrease the number the number of incomplete applications and the need for contractors to request additional information. With the implementation of this final rule, we would require contactor to deny, rather than reject paper or Web applications when a physician, NPP, or physician or NPP organization fails to cure any deficiencies/technicalities. Comment: One commenter stated that new physicians’ practices must begin paying rent, salaries and other expenses the minute they become operational, if not before. This commenter also stated that many of these physicians are already forced to take out loans to pay expenses in the early days of operation until they enroll and can bill for services furnished in the interim. Finally, this commenter stated that our proposal to limit retrospective billing to the later of the date of filing or the date the practice location is operational will inhibit the ability of physicians and NPPs to create their own organizations, and 248
CMS-1403-FC instead, it will force them to join already existing entities. Response: We do not believe that the Medicare program pays for services rendered prior to the date a new practice location is established. As described above, the physician or NPP would be allowed to file his or her enrollment application 30 days prior to the opening of new practice location and receive payments for services provided from the day the practice location was established or opened assuming that the physician met State licensing requirements and other Medicare program requirements at the time of filing and subsequently thereafter. Comment: One commenter urged CMS to withdraw any proposed changes to the enrollment process, but stated that they would consider supporting limiting retrospective billing to the later of the date of filing or the date the practice location is operational but only after Internet- based PECOS has been proven to facilitate timely enrollment processing (fewer than 30 days). Another commenter supported CMS implementing this requirement once the enrollment processing time is at a period of 30 to 45 days. Response: We do not believe that a change to the effective date of Medicare billing privileges has a nexus to the implementation of the Internet-based PECOS. 249
- Page 197 and 198: CMS-1403-FC admission. That is, the
- Page 199 and 200: CMS-1403-FC that CMS consider issue
- Page 201 and 202: CMS-1403-FC hold the provider in wh
- Page 203 and 204: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Commenters rai
- Page 205 and 206: CMS-1403-FC who have enrolled in th
- Page 207 and 208: CMS-1403-FC ● Posting IDTF standa
- Page 209 and 210: CMS-1403-FC other diagnostic testin
- Page 211 and 212: CMS-1403-FC entities furnishing mob
- Page 213 and 214: CMS-1403-FC state Radioactive Mater
- Page 215 and 216: CMS-1403-FC equipment and provide t
- Page 217 and 218: CMS-1403-FC Response: We understand
- Page 219 and 220: CMS-1403-FC believe that requiring
- Page 221 and 222: CMS-1403-FC these claims will ensur
- Page 223 and 224: CMS-1403-FC and NPP organizations,
- Page 225 and 226: CMS-1403-FC prior to their enrollin
- Page 227 and 228: CMS-1403-FC The date of approval is
- Page 229 and 230: CMS-1403-FC organizations, and indi
- Page 231 and 232: CMS-1403-FC To assist physician and
- Page 233 and 234: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 235 and 236: CMS-1403-FC date of filing and circ
- Page 237 and 238: CMS-1403-FC services are complying
- Page 239 and 240: CMS-1403-FC days when a Presidentia
- Page 241 and 242: CMS-1403-FC effective date under ap
- Page 243 and 244: CMS-1403-FC Comment: The suggestion
- Page 245 and 246: CMS-1403-FC Response: We thank the
- Page 247: CMS-1403-FC provider enrollment giv
- Page 251 and 252: CMS-1403-FC Response: As stated abo
- Page 253 and 254: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One commenter
- Page 255 and 256: CMS-1403-FC In an attempt to ensure
- Page 257 and 258: CMS-1403-FC rule, rather than limit
- Page 259 and 260: CMS-1403-FC changes have occurred,
- Page 261 and 262: CMS-1403-FC Response: While we moni
- Page 263 and 264: CMS-1403-FC records faster and more
- Page 265 and 266: CMS-1403-FC In §424.521(a)(1), we
- Page 267 and 268: CMS-1403-FC practitioners with the
- Page 269 and 270: CMS-1403-FC In June 2002 and Novemb
- Page 271 and 272: CMS-1403-FC full implementation sch
- Page 273 and 274: CMS-1403-FC with billing agents, cl
- Page 275 and 276: CMS-1403-FC 2. Medicare Billing Pri
- Page 277 and 278: CMS-1403-FC The FPLP is a collectio
- Page 279 and 280: CMS-1403-FC continued enrollment to
- Page 281 and 282: CMS-1403-FC Federal Payment Levy Pr
- Page 283 and 284: CMS-1403-FC Consistent with existin
- Page 285 and 286: CMS-1403-FC facilitate the enrollme
- Page 287 and 288: CMS-1403-FC determination. Specific
- Page 289 and 290: CMS-1403-FC individual practitioner
- Page 291 and 292: CMS-1403-FC determines in February
- Page 293 and 294: CMS-1403-FC Management Manual (IOM
- Page 295 and 296: CMS-1403-FC Response: Based on thes
- Page 297 and 298: CMS-1403-FC or continues to meet th
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
instead, it will force them to join already existing<br />
entities.<br />
Response: We do not believe that the Medicare program<br />
pays for services rendered prior to the date a new practice<br />
location is established. As described above, the physician<br />
or NPP would be allowed to file his or her enrollment<br />
application 30 days prior to the opening of new practice<br />
location and receive payments for services provided from<br />
the day the practice location was established or opened<br />
assuming that the physician met State licensing<br />
requirements and other Medicare program requirements at the<br />
time of filing and subsequently thereafter.<br />
Comment: One commenter urged <strong>CMS</strong> to withdraw any<br />
proposed changes to the enrollment process, but stated that<br />
they would consider supporting limiting retrospective<br />
billing to the later of the date of filing or the date the<br />
practice location is operational but only after Internet-<br />
based PECOS <strong>has</strong> <strong>been</strong> proven to facilitate timely enrollment<br />
processing (fewer than 30 days). Another commenter<br />
supported <strong>CMS</strong> implementing this requirement once the<br />
enrollment processing time is at a period of 30 to 45 days.<br />
Response: We do not believe that a change to the<br />
effective date of Medicare billing privileges <strong>has</strong> a nexus<br />
to the implementation of the Internet-based PECOS.<br />
249