Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC with their initial or revalidation enrollment application, or change in enrollment application. 3. Revocation of Enrollment and Billing Privileges of IDTFs in the Medicare Program Historically, we have allowed IDTFs whose Medicare billing numbers have been revoked to continue billing for services furnished prior to revocation for up to 27 months after the effective date of the revocation. Since we believe that permitting this extensive billing period poses a significant risk to the Medicare program, we proposed to limit the claims submission timeframe after revocation. In §424.535(g) (redesignated as §424.535(h), we proposed that a revoked IDTF must submit all outstanding claims for not previously submitted items and services furnished within 30 calendar days of the revocation effective date. We stated that this change is necessary to limit the Medicare program’s exposure to future vulnerabilities from physician and NPP organizations and individual practitioners that have had their billing privileges revoked. Accordingly, the proposed change would allow a Medicare contractor to conduct focused medical review on the claims submitted during the claims filing period to ensure that each claim is supported by medical documentation that the contractor can verify. We maintain that focused medical review of 220
CMS-1403-FC these claims will ensure that Medicare only pays for services furnished by a physician or NPP organization or individual practitioner and that these entities and individuals receive payment in a timely manner. In addition, we also proposed to add a new provision at §424.44(a)(3) to account for this provision related to the requirements for the timely filing of claims. The timely filing requirements in §424.44(a)(1) and (a)(2) will no longer apply to physician and NPP organizations, physicians, NPPs and IDTFs whose billing privileges have been revoked by CMS. Comment: Several commenters recommended that we withdraw all of our proposed changes to the requirements for physician enrollment in Medicare, including changes to the effective date of billing privileges, eligibility to participate in the program, enrollment processing, reporting requirements, and revocation of billing privileges. Many of the commenters were concerned that it would be burdensome to add new requirements where they must submit all claims within 60 days of the effective date of revocation because of the time it takes to process claims and that it would be easier to leave the retrospective billing rules as they are. 221
- Page 169 and 170: CMS-1403-FC make those estimates. A
- Page 171 and 172: CMS-1403-FC After removing the enro
- Page 173 and 174: CMS-1403-FC For CY 2009, we propose
- Page 175 and 176: CMS-1403-FC plain language over pol
- Page 177 and 178: CMS-1403-FC four quarters of ASP pr
- Page 179 and 180: CMS-1403-FC composite rates. The wa
- Page 181 and 182: CMS-1403-FC from the figure in the
- Page 183 and 184: CMS-1403-FC that our goal is the ev
- Page 185 and 186: CMS-1403-FC the average wage index
- Page 187 and 188: CMS-1403-FC Labor Statistics, to de
- Page 189 and 190: CMS-1403-FC been previously deemed
- Page 191 and 192: CMS-1403-FC CBSA where the campuses
- Page 193 and 194: CMS-1403-FC composite rates during
- Page 195 and 196: CMS-1403-FC target amount of compos
- Page 197 and 198: CMS-1403-FC admission. That is, the
- Page 199 and 200: CMS-1403-FC that CMS consider issue
- Page 201 and 202: CMS-1403-FC hold the provider in wh
- Page 203 and 204: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Commenters rai
- Page 205 and 206: CMS-1403-FC who have enrolled in th
- Page 207 and 208: CMS-1403-FC ● Posting IDTF standa
- Page 209 and 210: CMS-1403-FC other diagnostic testin
- Page 211 and 212: CMS-1403-FC entities furnishing mob
- Page 213 and 214: CMS-1403-FC state Radioactive Mater
- Page 215 and 216: CMS-1403-FC equipment and provide t
- Page 217 and 218: CMS-1403-FC Response: We understand
- Page 219: CMS-1403-FC believe that requiring
- Page 223 and 224: CMS-1403-FC and NPP organizations,
- Page 225 and 226: CMS-1403-FC prior to their enrollin
- Page 227 and 228: CMS-1403-FC The date of approval is
- Page 229 and 230: CMS-1403-FC organizations, and indi
- Page 231 and 232: CMS-1403-FC To assist physician and
- Page 233 and 234: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 235 and 236: CMS-1403-FC date of filing and circ
- Page 237 and 238: CMS-1403-FC services are complying
- Page 239 and 240: CMS-1403-FC days when a Presidentia
- Page 241 and 242: CMS-1403-FC effective date under ap
- Page 243 and 244: CMS-1403-FC Comment: The suggestion
- Page 245 and 246: CMS-1403-FC Response: We thank the
- Page 247 and 248: CMS-1403-FC provider enrollment giv
- Page 249 and 250: CMS-1403-FC instead, it will force
- Page 251 and 252: CMS-1403-FC Response: As stated abo
- Page 253 and 254: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One commenter
- Page 255 and 256: CMS-1403-FC In an attempt to ensure
- Page 257 and 258: CMS-1403-FC rule, rather than limit
- Page 259 and 260: CMS-1403-FC changes have occurred,
- Page 261 and 262: CMS-1403-FC Response: While we moni
- Page 263 and 264: CMS-1403-FC records faster and more
- Page 265 and 266: CMS-1403-FC In §424.521(a)(1), we
- Page 267 and 268: CMS-1403-FC practitioners with the
- Page 269 and 270: CMS-1403-FC In June 2002 and Novemb
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
with their initial or revalidation enrollment application,<br />
or change in enrollment application.<br />
3. Revocation of Enrollment and Billing Privileges of<br />
IDTFs in the Medicare Program<br />
Historically, we have allowed IDTFs whose Medicare<br />
billing numbers have <strong>been</strong> revoked to continue billing for<br />
services furnished prior to revocation for up to 27 months<br />
after the effective date of the revocation. Since we<br />
believe that permitting this extensive billing period poses<br />
a significant risk to the Medicare program, we proposed to<br />
limit the claims submission timeframe after revocation. In<br />
§424.535(g) (redesignated as §424.535(h), we proposed that<br />
a revoked IDTF must submit all outstanding claims for not<br />
previously <strong>submitted</strong> items and services furnished within 30<br />
calendar days of the revocation effective date. We stated<br />
that this change is necessary to limit the Medicare<br />
program’s exposure to future vulnerabilities from physician<br />
and NPP organizations and individual practitioners that<br />
have had their billing privileges revoked. Accordingly,<br />
the proposed change would allow a Medicare contractor to<br />
conduct focused medical review on the claims <strong>submitted</strong><br />
during the claims filing period to ensure that each claim<br />
is supported by medical <strong>document</strong>ation that the contractor<br />
can verify. We maintain that focused medical review of<br />
220