19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

CBSA-based geographic designations. Beginning<br />

January 1, 2006, during each year of the transition, an<br />

ESRD facility’s wage-adjusted composite rate (that is,<br />

without regard to any case-mix adjustments) is a blend of<br />

its old MSA-based wage-adjusted payment rate and its new<br />

CBSA-based wage adjusted payment rate for the transition<br />

year involved. In CY 2006, the first year of the<br />

transition, we implemented a 75/25 blend. In CY 2007, the<br />

second year of the transition, we implemented a 50/50<br />

blend. In CY 2008, the third year of the transition, we<br />

implemented a 25/75 blend. Consistent with the transition<br />

blends announced in the CY 2006 PFS final rule with comment<br />

period (70 FR 70170), in CY 2009, each ESRD facility’s<br />

composite payment rate will be based entirely on the<br />

CBSA-based wage index.<br />

For CY 2009, we proposed to reduce the wage index<br />

floor from 0.75 to 0.70. For this final year of the<br />

transition (CY 2009), we believe that a reduction to 0.70<br />

is appropriate as we continue to reassess the need for a<br />

wage index floor in future years. We believe that a<br />

gradual reduction in the floor is still needed to ensure<br />

patient access to dialysis in areas that have low wage<br />

index values, especially Puerto Rico, and to prevent sudden<br />

adverse effects to the payment system. However, we note<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!