Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC discussed in section II.H. of this final rule with comment period. To estimate the impact among various classes of ESRD facilities, it is imperative that the estimates of current payments and payments contain similar inputs. Therefore, we simulated payments only for those ESRD facilities that we are able to calculate both current 2008 payments and 2009 payments. ESRD providers were grouped into the categories based on characteristics provided in the Online Survey and Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) file and the most recent cost report data from the Healthcare Cost Report Information System (HCRIS). We also used the June 2008 update of CY 2007 National Claims History file as a basis for Medicare dialysis treatments and separately billable drugs and biologicals. Due to data limitations, we are unable to estimate current and proposed payments for 96 of the 4954 ESRD facilities that bill for ESRD dialysis treatments. Table 51 shows the impact of this year’s changes to CY 2009 payments to hospital-based and independent ESRD facilities. The first column of Table 51 identifies the type of ESRD provider, the second column indicates the number of ESRD facilities for each type, and the third column indicates the number of dialysis treatments. 1054

CMS-1403-FC The fourth column shows the effect of all changes to the ESRD wage index for CY 2009 as it affects the composite rate payments to ESRD facilities. The fourth column compares aggregate ESRD wage adjusted composite rate payments in the fourth year of the transition (CY 2009) to aggregate ESRD wage adjusted composite rate payments in the third year of the transition (CY 2008). In the fourth year of the transition (CY 2009), ESRD facilities receive 100 percent of the CBSA wage adjusted composite rate and 0 percent of the MSA wage adjusted composite rate. In the third year of the transition, ESRD facilities receive 75 percent of the CBSA wage adjusted composite rate and 25 percent of the MSA wage adjusted composite rate. The overall effect to all ESRD providers in aggregate is zero because the CY 2009 ESRD wage index has been multiplied by a BN adjustment factor to comply with the statutory requirement that any wage index revisions be done in a manner that results in the same aggregate amount of expenditures as would have been made without any changes in the wage index. The impacts are similar to those shown in the proposed rule. (See the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule (73 FR 38599) for a breakout of the effects associated with the change in the wage index floor.) 1055

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

The fourth column shows the effect of all changes to<br />

the ESRD wage index for CY 2009 as it affects the composite<br />

rate payments to ESRD facilities. The fourth column<br />

compares aggregate ESRD wage adjusted composite rate<br />

payments in the fourth year of the transition (CY 2009) to<br />

aggregate ESRD wage adjusted composite rate payments in the<br />

third year of the transition (CY 2008). In the fourth year<br />

of the transition (CY 2009), ESRD facilities receive<br />

100 percent of the CBSA wage adjusted composite rate and<br />

0 percent of the MSA wage adjusted composite rate. In the<br />

third year of the transition, ESRD facilities receive<br />

75 percent of the CBSA wage adjusted composite rate and<br />

25 percent of the MSA wage adjusted composite rate. The<br />

overall effect to all ESRD providers in aggregate is zero<br />

because the CY 2009 ESRD wage index <strong>has</strong> <strong>been</strong> multiplied by<br />

a BN adjustment factor to comply with the statutory<br />

requirement that any wage index revisions be done in a<br />

manner that results in the same aggregate amount of<br />

expenditures as would have <strong>been</strong> made without any changes in<br />

the wage index. The impacts are similar to those shown in<br />

the proposed rule. (See the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule<br />

(73 FR 38599) for a breakout of the effects associated with<br />

the change in the wage index floor.)<br />

1055

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!