19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

discussed in section II.H. of this final rule with comment<br />

period. To estimate the impact among various classes of<br />

ESRD facilities, it is imperative that the estimates of<br />

current payments and payments contain similar inputs.<br />

Therefore, we simulated payments only for those ESRD<br />

facilities that we are able to calculate both current 2008<br />

payments and 2009 payments.<br />

ESRD providers were grouped into the categories based<br />

on characteristics provided in the Online Survey and<br />

Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) file and the most<br />

recent cost report data from the Healthcare Cost Report<br />

Information System (HCRIS). We also used the June 2008<br />

update of CY 2007 National Claims History file as a basis<br />

for Medicare dialysis treatments and separately billable<br />

drugs and biologicals. Due to data limitations, we are<br />

unable to estimate current and proposed payments for 96 of<br />

the 4954 ESRD facilities that bill for ESRD dialysis<br />

treatments.<br />

Table 51 shows the impact of this year’s changes to<br />

CY 2009 payments to hospital-based and independent ESRD<br />

facilities. The first column of Table 51 identifies the<br />

type of ESRD provider, the second column indicates the<br />

number of ESRD facilities for each type, and the third<br />

column indicates the number of dialysis treatments.<br />

1054

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!