19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

errors; enhanced patient safety; reduced complications;<br />

decreased overall length of stay in the ICU; and resulted<br />

in a statistically significant decrease in ICU mortality in<br />

comparison to the traditional ICU model. The commenters<br />

also noted that patient outcomes have <strong>been</strong> equivalent if<br />

not superior to patient outcomes prior to adopting this<br />

model of care.<br />

The American Medical Association (AMA) recently<br />

developed Category III tracking codes for remote critical<br />

care services (0188T-0189T). Two specialty societies<br />

commented that they are working with other critical care<br />

organizations to collect and analyze data on remote<br />

critical care services, as requested by the CPT editorial<br />

panel.<br />

Response: In the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule, we<br />

explained that we have no evidence suggesting that the use<br />

of telehealth could be a reasonable surrogate for the<br />

face-to-face delivery of critical care services, as defined<br />

by HCPCS codes 99291 and 99292. We agree with the comments<br />

that, within the current standards of practice, critical<br />

care services require the physical presence of the<br />

physician rendering the critical care services.<br />

Our proposal not to add critical care services to the<br />

list of <strong>approved</strong> telehealth services for Medicare was in no<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!