Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC metropolitan statistical area and has fewer than 100 beds. We have determined that this final rule with comment period will have minimal impact on small hospitals located in rural areas. Of the 196 hospital-based ESRD facilities located in rural areas, only 40 are affiliated with hospitals with fewer than 100 beds. 1036 Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. In 2008, that threshold is approximately $130 million. This final rule with comment period will not mandate any requirements for State, local, or tribal governments. Medicare beneficiaries are considered to be part of the private sector for this purpose. A discussion concerning the impact of this rule on beneficiaries is found later in this section. Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. The e-prescribing portions of this rule present a potential Federalism implication. No State categorically bars e-prescribing, but the scope and
CMS-1403-FC substance of State laws varies widely among the States. In recent years, many States have more actively legislated in this area. Should a State law be contrary to the Part D e-prescribing standards, or should it restrict the ability to carry out the Medicare Part D e-prescribing program, the MMA provides for preemption of that State law at section 1860D-4(e)(5) of the Act. Section 1860D-4(e)(5) provides: Relation to State Laws. The standards promulgated under the subsection shall supersede any State law or regulation that -- (A) Is contrary to the standards or restricts the ability to carry out this part; and (B) Pertains to the electronic transmission of medication history and of information on eligibility, benefits, and prescriptions with respect to covered Part D drugs under this part. For the reasons given above, we have determined that States would not incur any direct costs as a result of this rule. However, as mandated by section 1860D-4(e) of the Act, and under Executive Order 13132, we are required to minimize the extent of preemption, consistent with achieving the objectives of the Federal statute, and to meet certain other conditions. We believe that, taken as a 1037
- Page 985 and 986: CMS-1403-FC In the Competitive Acqu
- Page 987 and 988: CMS-1403-FC glasses, hand magnifier
- Page 989 and 990: CMS-1403-FC Our interpretation of t
- Page 991 and 992: CMS-1403-FC Response: We understand
- Page 993 and 994: CMS-1403-FC defines “eyeglass”
- Page 995 and 996: CMS-1403-FC this statutory exclusio
- Page 997 and 998: CMS-1403-FC advances in the use of
- Page 999 and 1000: CMS-1403-FC is paid for his or her
- Page 1001 and 1002: CMS-1403-FC XII. Provisions of the
- Page 1003 and 1004: CMS-1403-FC these RUC recommendatio
- Page 1005 and 1006: CMS-1403-FC services. We believe a
- Page 1007 and 1008: CMS-1403-FC Section 144(b) of the M
- Page 1009 and 1010: CMS-1403-FC rulemaking with respect
- Page 1011 and 1012: CMS-1403-FC (respectively) of this
- Page 1013 and 1014: CMS-1403-FC completing and submitti
- Page 1015 and 1016: CMS-1403-FC §424.516(d)(1). Additi
- Page 1017 and 1018: CMS-1403-FC to several associated i
- Page 1019 and 1020: CMS-1403-FC incentive payment for 2
- Page 1021 and 1022: CMS-1403-FC year of PQRI reporting)
- Page 1023 and 1024: CMS-1403-FC Based on the assumption
- Page 1025 and 1026: CMS-1403-FC these activities for th
- Page 1027 and 1028: CMS-1403-FC per hour, we estimate t
- Page 1029 and 1030: CMS-1403-FC Because of the large nu
- Page 1031 and 1032: CMS-1403-FC threshold, and hence al
- Page 1033 and 1034: CMS-1403-FC shoes, the regulation i
- Page 1035: CMS-1403-FC with comment period for
- Page 1039 and 1040: CMS-1403-FC $20 million from what e
- Page 1041 and 1042: CMS-1403-FC ● Impact of Work RVU
- Page 1043 and 1044: CMS-1403-FC imaging services from t
- Page 1045 and 1046: CMS-1403-FC ● Impact of section 1
- Page 1047 and 1048: CMS-1403-FC management, could have
- Page 1049 and 1050: CMS-1403-FC Table 50 illustrates, f
- Page 1051 and 1052: CMS-1403-FC CPT/ HCPCS Mod Descript
- Page 1053 and 1054: CMS-1403-FC impact associated with
- Page 1055 and 1056: CMS-1403-FC The fourth column shows
- Page 1057 and 1058: CMS-1403-FC the CY 2007 claims. The
- Page 1059 and 1060: CMS-1403-FC 1059 4/This column show
- Page 1061 and 1062: CMS-1403-FC requirements is to allo
- Page 1063 and 1064: CMS-1403-FC This amendment of the e
- Page 1065 and 1066: CMS-1403-FC 4 minutes per call, lab
- Page 1067 and 1068: CMS-1403-FC e-prescribing and who m
- Page 1069 and 1070: CMS-1403-FC anti-markup provisions
- Page 1071 and 1072: CMS-1403-FC approximately $50 per h
- Page 1073 and 1074: CMS-1403-FC e-prescribing measure i
- Page 1075 and 1076: CMS-1403-FC we estimate that each e
- Page 1077 and 1078: CMS-1403-FC P. Prohibition Concerni
- Page 1079 and 1080: CMS-1403-FC that provides a calcula
- Page 1081 and 1082: CMS-1403-FC treatment) that occur a
- Page 1083 and 1084: CMS-1403-FC locality (+5.37 percent
- Page 1085 and 1086: CMS-1403-FC additional rental payme
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
metropolitan statistical area and <strong>has</strong> fewer than 100 beds.<br />
We have determined that this final rule with comment period<br />
will have minimal impact on small hospitals located in<br />
rural areas. Of the 196 hospital-based ESRD facilities<br />
located in rural areas, only 40 are affiliated with<br />
hospitals with fewer than 100 beds.<br />
1036<br />
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995<br />
(UMRA) also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs<br />
and benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates require<br />
spending in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995 dollars,<br />
updated annually for inflation. In 2008, that threshold is<br />
approximately $130 million. <strong>This</strong> final rule with comment<br />
period will not mandate any requirements for State, local,<br />
or tribal governments. Medicare beneficiaries are<br />
considered to be part of the private sector for this<br />
purpose. A discussion concerning the impact of this rule on<br />
beneficiaries is found later in this section.<br />
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements<br />
that an agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed<br />
rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial<br />
direct requirement costs on State and local governments,<br />
preempts State law, or otherwise <strong>has</strong> Federalism<br />
implications. The e-prescribing portions of this rule<br />
present a potential Federalism implication. No State<br />
categorically bars e-prescribing, but the scope and