19.02.2013 Views

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

January 7, 2004 (69 FR 1084), we stated that the specialty<br />

<strong>of</strong> urology meets the above criteria, along with gynecology<br />

and rheumatology (69 FR 1094). Because we are accepting new<br />

survey data from the AUA, we are required to exempt, from<br />

the budget neutrality adjustment any impacts <strong>of</strong> accepting<br />

these data for purposes <strong>of</strong> calculating PE RVUs for drug<br />

administration services.<br />

In addition, Lewin recommended blending the radiation<br />

oncology data from this year’s AFROC survey data with last<br />

year’s ASTRO survey data to calculate the PE/HR. According<br />

to the Lewin Group, the goal <strong>of</strong> the AFROC survey was to<br />

represent the population <strong>of</strong> freestanding radiation oncology<br />

centers only. In order to develop an overall average for<br />

the radiation oncology PE pool, the Lewin Group recommended<br />

we use the AFROC survey for freestanding radiation oncology<br />

centers, and the hospital-based subset <strong>of</strong> last year's ASTRO<br />

survey. We agree that this blending <strong>of</strong> the AFROC and ASTRO<br />

data is a reasonable way to calculate an average PE/HR that<br />

fully reflects the practice <strong>of</strong> radiation oncology in all<br />

settings. Therefore, we are proposing to use the new PE/HR<br />

calculated in this manner for radiation oncology.<br />

We propose to use the following PE/HR figures (deflated<br />

to 1995 values to be consistent with the SMS data):<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!