2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

19.02.2013 Views

esults in a scaling factor of 1.51. Next, the unscaled indirect charge-based cost for procedure 00002 of $59.07 (from step 4-Table 4) is multiplied by the 1.51 scaling factor, resulting in scaled indirect costs for this procedure of $89.19. TABLE 12--Calculation and Application of Indirect Cost Scaling Factors Standard Methodology Indirect Costs Direct Cost 46 Specialty Specific PE RVU (A) (B) (C) Total - NPWP "SMS" (a) Pool $9,407,404 Total NPWP Indirect (b) Expense $6,207,961 (c) Scaling Factor 1.51 CPT 00002 - Unscaled (d) Value $59.07 CPT 00002 - Scaled (e) Value $89.19 $59.07 $148.26 NPWP Step 6--Budget Neutrality and Final RVU Calculation Similar to the calculation for codes with physician work, the BNF is applied to (multiplied by) the scaled direct and indirect expenses for each code to set the PE RVU for the upcoming year. In Table 13, the sum of the scaled direct and indirect expenses for hypothetical code 00002 ($148.26) is multiplied by the BNF (0.022 in this example) to yield a PE RVU of 3.26.

TABLE 13--Budget Neutrality and Final RVU Calculation Total Scaled Direct and Indirect Inputs Budget Neutrality Factor Final PE RVU Code 00002 $148.26 0.022 3.26 d. Facility/Non-facility Costs Procedures that can be performed in a physician’s office as well as in a hospital have two PE RVUs; facility and non-facility. The non-facility setting includes physicians’ offices, patients’ homes, freestanding imaging centers, and independent pathology labs. Facility settings include hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The methodology for calculating the PE RVU is the same for both facility and non-facility RVUs, but is calculated independently to yield two separate PE RVUs. Because the PEs for services provided in a facility setting are generally included in the payment to the facility (rather than the payment to the physician under the fee schedule), the PE RVUs are generally lower for services provided in the facility setting. 2. PE Proposals for CY 2006 The following discussions outline the specific PE related proposals for CY 2006. a. Supplemental PE Surveys 47

esults in a scaling factor <strong>of</strong> 1.51. Next, the unscaled<br />

indirect charge-based cost for procedure 00002 <strong>of</strong> $59.07<br />

(from step 4-Table 4) is multiplied by the 1.51 scaling<br />

factor, resulting in scaled indirect costs for this<br />

procedure <strong>of</strong> $89.19.<br />

TABLE 12--Calculation and Application <strong>of</strong> Indirect Cost<br />

Scaling Factors<br />

Standard Methodology<br />

Indirect<br />

Costs<br />

Direct Cost<br />

46<br />

Specialty<br />

Specific<br />

PE RVU<br />

(A) (B) (C)<br />

Total - NPWP "SMS"<br />

(a)<br />

Pool<br />

$9,407,404<br />

Total NPWP Indirect<br />

(b)<br />

Expense<br />

$6,207,961<br />

(c) Scaling Factor 1.51<br />

CPT 00002 - Unscaled<br />

(d)<br />

Value<br />

$59.07<br />

CPT 00002 - Scaled<br />

(e)<br />

Value<br />

$89.19 $59.07 $148.26<br />

NPWP Step 6--Budget Neutrality and Final RVU Calculation<br />

Similar to the calculation for codes with physician<br />

work, the BNF is applied to (multiplied by) the scaled<br />

direct and indirect expenses for each code to set the PE RVU<br />

for the upcoming year.<br />

In Table 13, the sum <strong>of</strong> the scaled direct and indirect<br />

expenses for hypothetical code 00002 ($148.26) is multiplied<br />

by the BNF (0.022 in this example) to yield a PE RVU <strong>of</strong><br />

3.26.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!