2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology
2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology
esults in a scaling factor of 1.51. Next, the unscaled indirect charge-based cost for procedure 00002 of $59.07 (from step 4-Table 4) is multiplied by the 1.51 scaling factor, resulting in scaled indirect costs for this procedure of $89.19. TABLE 12--Calculation and Application of Indirect Cost Scaling Factors Standard Methodology Indirect Costs Direct Cost 46 Specialty Specific PE RVU (A) (B) (C) Total - NPWP "SMS" (a) Pool $9,407,404 Total NPWP Indirect (b) Expense $6,207,961 (c) Scaling Factor 1.51 CPT 00002 - Unscaled (d) Value $59.07 CPT 00002 - Scaled (e) Value $89.19 $59.07 $148.26 NPWP Step 6--Budget Neutrality and Final RVU Calculation Similar to the calculation for codes with physician work, the BNF is applied to (multiplied by) the scaled direct and indirect expenses for each code to set the PE RVU for the upcoming year. In Table 13, the sum of the scaled direct and indirect expenses for hypothetical code 00002 ($148.26) is multiplied by the BNF (0.022 in this example) to yield a PE RVU of 3.26.
TABLE 13--Budget Neutrality and Final RVU Calculation Total Scaled Direct and Indirect Inputs Budget Neutrality Factor Final PE RVU Code 00002 $148.26 0.022 3.26 d. Facility/Non-facility Costs Procedures that can be performed in a physician’s office as well as in a hospital have two PE RVUs; facility and non-facility. The non-facility setting includes physicians’ offices, patients’ homes, freestanding imaging centers, and independent pathology labs. Facility settings include hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The methodology for calculating the PE RVU is the same for both facility and non-facility RVUs, but is calculated independently to yield two separate PE RVUs. Because the PEs for services provided in a facility setting are generally included in the payment to the facility (rather than the payment to the physician under the fee schedule), the PE RVUs are generally lower for services provided in the facility setting. 2. PE Proposals for CY 2006 The following discussions outline the specific PE related proposals for CY 2006. a. Supplemental PE Surveys 47
- Page 1 and 2: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV
- Page 3 and 4: 2. By mail. You may mail written co
- Page 5 and 6: Rick Ensor (410) 786-5617 (for issu
- Page 7 and 8: service of the U.S. Government Prin
- Page 9 and 10: 4. Proposed Revisions to §413.170
- Page 11 and 12: AGA American Gastroenterological As
- Page 13 and 14: GAO General Accounting Office GPCI
- Page 15 and 16: PLI Professional liability insuranc
- Page 17 and 18: Initially, only the physician work
- Page 19 and 20: This resource-based system was base
- Page 21 and 22: effect in 1997, published on Novemb
- Page 23 and 24: ● Revised requirements for superv
- Page 25 and 26: efinement of work RVUs; and solicit
- Page 27 and 28: historical allowed charges. This le
- Page 29 and 30: November 1, 2001 (66 FR 55246).) Th
- Page 31 and 32: The CPEPs identified specific input
- Page 33 and 34: codes that the RUC has not yet revi
- Page 35 and 36: procedure: $27,305,408. In this exa
- Page 37 and 38: as a whole. Indirect costs include
- Page 39 and 40: ● The unscaled indirect expense a
- Page 41 and 42: BNF is applied to (multiplied by) t
- Page 43 and 44: NPWP Step 2--Calculation of Charge-
- Page 45: In Table 11, the scaled total direc
- Page 49 and 50: The following discussion outlines t
- Page 51 and 52: exist, and suggests that the need f
- Page 53 and 54: TABLE 14--Practice Expense Per Hour
- Page 55 and 56: We believe that we have consistentl
- Page 57 and 58: Due to the ongoing refinement by th
- Page 59 and 60: indirect PE methodology is inaccura
- Page 61 and 62: multi-specialty PEAC that were base
- Page 63 and 64: the needed survey or other data or
- Page 65 and 66: PERC/RUC recommendations for these
- Page 67 and 68: eflect the typical number of cast c
- Page 69 and 70: on comments received and additional
- Page 71 and 72: We have reviewed the PE database an
- Page 73 and 74: the ACR. We have accepted the follo
- Page 75 and 76: ● Clinical Labor for G-codes Rela
- Page 77 and 78: proposed associated prices that we
- Page 79 and 80: Supply Code Supply Description Unit
- Page 81 and 82: ● Supply and Equipment Items Need
- Page 83 and 84: Code 2005 Description Unit Unit Pri
- Page 85 and 86: Code 2005 Description Price EQ212 p
- Page 87 and 88: Effective January 1, 2006, this pro
- Page 89 and 90: challenge the validity of a new loc
- Page 91 and 92: ones reconfigured). Yet we also rec
- Page 93 and 94: The issue of payment locality desig
- Page 95 and 96: specialties listed infrequently as
esults in a scaling factor <strong>of</strong> 1.51. Next, the unscaled<br />
indirect charge-based cost for procedure 00002 <strong>of</strong> $59.07<br />
(from step 4-Table 4) is multiplied by the 1.51 scaling<br />
factor, resulting in scaled indirect costs for this<br />
procedure <strong>of</strong> $89.19.<br />
TABLE 12--Calculation and Application <strong>of</strong> Indirect Cost<br />
Scaling Factors<br />
Standard Methodology<br />
Indirect<br />
Costs<br />
Direct Cost<br />
46<br />
Specialty<br />
Specific<br />
PE RVU<br />
(A) (B) (C)<br />
Total - NPWP "SMS"<br />
(a)<br />
Pool<br />
$9,407,404<br />
Total NPWP Indirect<br />
(b)<br />
Expense<br />
$6,207,961<br />
(c) Scaling Factor 1.51<br />
CPT 00002 - Unscaled<br />
(d)<br />
Value<br />
$59.07<br />
CPT 00002 - Scaled<br />
(e)<br />
Value<br />
$89.19 $59.07 $148.26<br />
NPWP Step 6--Budget Neutrality and Final RVU Calculation<br />
Similar to the calculation for codes with physician<br />
work, the BNF is applied to (multiplied by) the scaled<br />
direct and indirect expenses for each code to set the PE RVU<br />
for the upcoming year.<br />
In Table 13, the sum <strong>of</strong> the scaled direct and indirect<br />
expenses for hypothetical code 00002 ($148.26) is multiplied<br />
by the BNF (0.022 in this example) to yield a PE RVU <strong>of</strong><br />
3.26.