2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

19.02.2013 Views

To illustrate this point, as shown in Table 34, the 358 2005 national payment amount in the nonfacility setting for CPT code 99203 (Office/outpatient visit, new), is $97.02 which means that currently a beneficiary is responsible for 20 percent of this amount, or $19.40. Under this proposed rule the 2006 national payment amount in the nonfacility setting for CPT code 99203, as shown in Table 34, is $93.33 which means that, in 2006, the beneficiary coinsurance for this service would be $18.66. Very few of the changes we are proposing impact overall payments and therefore will affect Medicare beneficiaries’ coinsurance liability. Proposals discussed above that do affect overall spending would similarly impact beneficiaries’ coinsurance. For example, we have tried to ensure that the proposal concerning physician self-referral for nuclear medicine services would not adversely impact the medical care of Medicare or Medicaid patients. While we recognize that these proposed revisions may have an impact on current arrangements under which patients are receiving medical care, there are other ways to structure these arrangements so that patients may continue to receive medically necessary nuclear medicine services. In almost all cases, we believe this proposal concerning physician referral for nuclear medicine services should not require substantial changes in

delivery arrangements and would help minimize anti-competitive behavior that can affect where a 359 beneficiary receives health care services and possibly the quality of the services furnished. We also believe it will minimize the number of medically unnecessary nuclear medicine procedures billed to the Medicare and Medicaid programs. N. Accounting Statement As required by OMB Circular A-4 (available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a004/a-4.pdf), in Table 38 below, we have prepared an accounting statement showing the classification of the expenditures associated with the provisions of this proposed rule. This table includes the impact of the proposed changes in this rule on providers and suppliers and encompasses the anticipated negative update to the physician fee schedule based on the statutory SGR formula. Expenditures are classified as transfers to Medicare providers/or suppliers (that is, ESRD facilities and physicians, other practitioners and medical suppliers that receive payment under the physician fee schedule or Medicare Part B).

To illustrate this point, as shown in Table 34, the<br />

358<br />

2005 national payment amount in the nonfacility setting for<br />

CPT code 99203 (Office/outpatient visit, new), is $97.02<br />

which means that currently a beneficiary is responsible for<br />

20 percent <strong>of</strong> this amount, or $19.40. Under this <strong>proposed</strong><br />

rule the <strong>2006</strong> national payment amount in the nonfacility<br />

setting for CPT code 99203, as shown in Table 34, is $93.33<br />

which means that, in <strong>2006</strong>, the beneficiary coinsurance for<br />

this service would be $18.66.<br />

Very few <strong>of</strong> the changes we are proposing impact overall<br />

payments and therefore will affect Medicare beneficiaries’<br />

coinsurance liability. Proposals discussed above that do<br />

affect overall spending would similarly impact<br />

beneficiaries’ coinsurance.<br />

For example, we have tried to ensure that the proposal<br />

concerning physician self-referral for nuclear medicine<br />

services would not adversely impact the medical care <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicare or Medicaid patients. While we recognize that<br />

these <strong>proposed</strong> revisions may have an impact on current<br />

arrangements under which patients are receiving medical<br />

care, there are other ways to structure these arrangements<br />

so that patients may continue to receive medically necessary<br />

nuclear medicine services. In almost all cases, we believe<br />

this proposal concerning physician referral for nuclear<br />

medicine services should not require substantial changes in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!