2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

19.02.2013 Views

2006) including the 8.9 percent drug add-on amount to 350 spending under current payments for drugs with the current drug add-on of 8.7 percent. In order to make column 5 comparable with rest of Table 38, current composite rate payments to ESRD facilities were included in both current and proposed spending calculations. We did not simulate any case mix in this impact table because 2004 claims data do not include the new data fields (height and weight) that are needed to calculate case mix. These data fields were not required be reported by providers until January 1, 2005. However, we have not proposed any changes to case mix for calendar year 2006. Column 6 shows the overall effect of all changes in drug and composite rate payments to ESRD providers. The overall effect is measured as the difference between proposed payment with all MMA changes as proposed in this rule and current payment. Proposed payment is computed by multiplying the composite rate for each provider (with both the proposed wage index and the 8.9 percent drug add-on) times dialysis treatments from 2004. In addition, the proposed payment includes payments for separately billable drugs under the ASP +6 drug pricing inflated to 2006 levels. Current payment is the current wage adjusted composite rate for each provider times dialysis treatments from 2004 claims

plus current AAP priced drug payments for separately billable drugs with the current 8.7 percent drug add-on. The overall impact to ESRD providers in aggregate is 0.5 percent. Among the two separately shown effects, the 351 effect of changes to the wage index has the most variation among provider type but is budget neutral in aggregate. The effect of change in drug payments contributes most to the overall effect, but varies little among provider types. We also note that the proposed revisions to the composite rate exceptions process will have no impact on payments to ESRD providers since we have only proposed changes in process and these changes do not affect which providers will be eligible for exceptions nor the amount of the exception. F. Payment for Covered Outpatient Drugs and Biologicals As discussed in section II.H. of this proposed rule, the proposal to pay a reduced supplying fee for each Medicare Part B oral drug prescription, after the first one, supplied to a beneficiary during a month is estimated to reduce total Federal expenditures by $8 million in 2006, and $30 million over the five-year period, CY 2006 to 2010. The preamble seeks comment on an appropriate inhalation drug dispensing fee amount for 2006. The effect on Federal expenditures of a potential change to the inhalation drug

plus current AAP priced drug payments for separately<br />

billable drugs with the current 8.7 percent drug add-on.<br />

The overall impact to ESRD providers in aggregate is<br />

0.5 percent. Among the two separately shown effects, the<br />

351<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> changes to the wage index has the most variation<br />

among provider type but is budget neutral in aggregate. The<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> change in drug payments contributes most to the<br />

overall effect, but varies little among provider types.<br />

We also note that the <strong>proposed</strong> revisions to the<br />

composite rate exceptions process will have no impact on<br />

payments to ESRD providers since we have only <strong>proposed</strong><br />

changes in process and these changes do not affect which<br />

providers will be eligible for exceptions nor the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

the exception.<br />

F. Payment for Covered Outpatient Drugs and Biologicals<br />

As discussed in section II.H. <strong>of</strong> this <strong>proposed</strong> rule,<br />

the proposal to pay a reduced supplying <strong>fee</strong> for each<br />

Medicare Part B oral drug prescription, after the first one,<br />

supplied to a beneficiary during a month is estimated to<br />

reduce total Federal expenditures by $8 million in <strong>2006</strong>, and<br />

$30 million over the five-year period, CY <strong>2006</strong> to 2010. The<br />

preamble seeks comment on an appropriate inhalation drug<br />

dispensing <strong>fee</strong> amount for <strong>2006</strong>. The effect on Federal<br />

expenditures <strong>of</strong> a potential change to the inhalation drug

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!