2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology
2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology
346 simulated payments only for those ESRD facilities for which we are able to calculate both current 2005 payments and proposed 2006 payments. Due to data limitations, we are unable to estimate current and proposed payments for 77 facilities that bill for ESRD dialysis treatments. ESRD providers were grouped into the categories based on characteristics provided in the Online Survey and Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) file and the most recent cost report data from the Healthcare Cost Report Information System (HCRIS). We also used the December 2004 update of CY 2004 Standard Analytical File (SAF) claims as a basis for Medicare dialysis treatments and separately billable drugs and biologicals. While the December 2004 update of the 2004 SAF file is not complete, we wanted to use the most recent data available, and plan to use an updated version of the 2004 SAF file for the final rule.
347 TABLE 37--Impact of Proposed Changes in Payments to Hospital Based and Independent ESRD Facilities (Includes Drug and Composite Rate Payments) [Percent Change in Total Payments to ESRD Facilities (Both Program and Beneficiaries)] 1 2 Number Of Facilities 3 Number of Dialysis Treatments (in millions) 4 Effect of Changes in Wage Index 1/ 5 Effect of Changes in Drug Payments 2/ 6 Overall Effect 3/ All 4,293 29.5 0.0 1.2 0.5 Independent 3,716 26.1 -0.1 1.2 0.4 Hospital Based 577 3.3 1.3 1.0 1.2 Size Small < than 5000 treatments per year Medium 5000 to 9999 treatments per year Large > than 10000 treatments per year 1,714 4.9 -0.5 1.1 0.1 1,724 12.4 0.1 1.3 0.6 855 12.1 0.2 1.2 0.6 Type of Ownership Profit 3,388 23.8 -0.2 1.2 0.4 Nonprofit 896 5.6 1.0 1.1 1.0 Rural 1,189 6.0 -0.6 1.1 0.1 Urban 3,104 23.5 0.2 1.2 0.6 Region New England 143 1.1 3.7 1.6 2.9 Middle Atlantic 521 3.9 2.1 1.5 1.9 East North Central 651 4.6 -1.9 0.9 -0.8 West North Central 333 1.6 -0.9 1.0 -0.2 South Atlantic 975 6.8 -0.3 1.2 0.4 East South Central 342 2.2 -1.6 1.1 -0.4 West South Central 585 4.1 -1.3 1.1 -0.3 Mountain 226 1.3 -0.6 1.1 0.0 Pacific 486 3.7 2.6 1.5 2.2 Puerto Rico 31 0.3 -1.6 0.7 -0.7 1. This column shows the effect of wage changes to composite rate payments to ESRD providers. Composite rate payments computed using the current wage index are compared to composite rate payments using the proposed wage index changes. 2. This column shows the effect of the changes in drug payments to ESRD providers. These include proposed changes In payment for separately billable drugs (2006 ASP+6) and the 8.9% drug add-on compared to current payment for separately billable drugs (2005 AAP) and the current 8.7 percent drug add-on.
- Page 295 and 296: adiopharmaceuticals. In the final r
- Page 297 and 298: 297 (including Nuclear Medicine and
- Page 299 and 300: we would resolve any doubt on the m
- Page 301 and 302: facility payment rather than a TC c
- Page 303 and 304: ventures and leases, pose a risk of
- Page 305 and 306: 305 Underlying the projected rate r
- Page 307 and 308: decisions are central to the health
- Page 309 and 310: however. We are particularly intere
- Page 311 and 312: The collection requirement in this
- Page 313 and 314: eporting requirements are discussed
- Page 315 and 316: IV. Response to Comments Because of
- Page 317 and 318: achieve the objectives with less si
- Page 319 and 320: 319 The analysis and discussion pro
- Page 321 and 322: 321 for a new code may change becau
- Page 323 and 324: 323 TABLE 30--Impact of Practice Ex
- Page 325 and 326: hour for these specialties. As note
- Page 327 and 328: Both physical/occupational therapy
- Page 329 and 330: 329 proposing to add cardiology cat
- Page 331 and 332: Speciality Impact of Removing Aberr
- Page 333 and 334: Family TABLE 32--Impact of Multiple
- Page 335 and 336: 335 column includes the current est
- Page 337 and 338: Specialty Medicare Allowed Charges
- Page 339 and 340: 339 Non-Facility Facility % % HCPCS
- Page 341 and 342: 341 have undertaken a similar analy
- Page 343 and 344: of the updated GPCI data. For the R
- Page 345: C. Medicare Telehealth Services In
- Page 349 and 350: 349 of the increase to the drug add
- Page 351 and 352: plus current AAP priced drug paymen
- Page 353 and 354: 353 the center up to what it would
- Page 355 and 356: satisfies the requirements of the i
- Page 357 and 358: 357 certainty the extent of these s
- Page 359 and 360: delivery arrangements and would hel
- Page 361 and 362: List of Subjects 42 CFR Part 405 Ad
- Page 363 and 364: (including by refunding amounts in
- Page 365 and 366: (2) Any financial incentives provid
- Page 367 and 368: 7. The authority citation for part
- Page 369 and 370: * * * * * PART 413--PRINCIPLES OF R
- Page 371 and 372: 371 D. Redesignating paragraphs (l)
- Page 373 and 374: 373 (3) The additional nursing hour
- Page 375 and 376: cost components relating to trainin
- Page 377 and 378: CAPD and CCPD) when the facility ac
- Page 379 and 380: Indirect Sales means from the manuf
- Page 381 and 382: amount for the quarter to the neare
- Page 383 and 384: 383 25. The heading for Part 426 is
- Page 385 and 386: 385 (Catalog of Federal Domestic As
- Page 387 and 388: 1. CPT/HCPCS code. This is the CPT
- Page 389 and 390: grace period. This indicator is no
- Page 391 and 392: 5. Physician work RVUs. These are t
- Page 393 and 394: ADDENDUM B: RELATIVE VALUE UNITS (R
- Page 395 and 396: ADDENDUM B: RELATIVE VALUE UNITS (R
347<br />
TABLE 37--Impact <strong>of</strong> Proposed Changes in Payments to Hospital<br />
Based and Independent ESRD Facilities<br />
(Includes Drug and Composite Rate Payments)<br />
[Percent Change in Total Payments to ESRD Facilities<br />
(Both Program and Beneficiaries)]<br />
1<br />
2<br />
Number<br />
Of Facilities<br />
3<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Dialysis<br />
Treatments<br />
(in millions)<br />
4<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
Changes<br />
in Wage<br />
Index 1/<br />
5<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
Changes<br />
in Drug<br />
Payments 2/<br />
6<br />
Overall<br />
Effect<br />
3/<br />
All 4,293 29.5 0.0 1.2 0.5<br />
Independent 3,716 26.1 -0.1 1.2 0.4<br />
Hospital Based 577 3.3 1.3 1.0 1.2<br />
Size<br />
Small < than 5000<br />
treatments per year<br />
Medium 5000 to 9999<br />
treatments per year<br />
Large > than 10000<br />
treatments per year<br />
1,714 4.9 -0.5 1.1 0.1<br />
1,724 12.4 0.1 1.3 0.6<br />
855 12.1 0.2 1.2 0.6<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Ownership<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>it 3,388 23.8 -0.2 1.2 0.4<br />
Nonpr<strong>of</strong>it 896 5.6 1.0 1.1 1.0<br />
Rural 1,189 6.0 -0.6 1.1 0.1<br />
Urban 3,104 23.5 0.2 1.2 0.6<br />
Region<br />
New England 143 1.1 3.7 1.6 2.9<br />
Middle Atlantic 521 3.9 2.1 1.5 1.9<br />
East North Central 651 4.6 -1.9 0.9 -0.8<br />
West North Central 333 1.6 -0.9 1.0 -0.2<br />
South Atlantic 975 6.8 -0.3 1.2 0.4<br />
East South Central 342 2.2 -1.6 1.1 -0.4<br />
West South Central 585 4.1 -1.3 1.1 -0.3<br />
Mountain 226 1.3 -0.6 1.1 0.0<br />
Pacific 486 3.7 2.6 1.5 2.2<br />
Puerto Rico 31 0.3 -1.6 0.7 -0.7<br />
1. This column shows the effect <strong>of</strong> wage changes to composite rate payments to ESRD providers. Composite rate<br />
payments computed using the current wage index are compared to composite rate payments using the <strong>proposed</strong> wage<br />
index changes.<br />
2. This column shows the effect <strong>of</strong> the changes in drug payments to ESRD providers. These include <strong>proposed</strong> changes<br />
In payment for separately billable drugs (<strong>2006</strong> ASP+6) and the 8.9% drug add-on compared to current payment for<br />
separately billable drugs (2005 AAP) and the current 8.7 percent drug add-on.