19.02.2013 Views

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Audiology is clearly negatively impacted when its<br />

326<br />

services are removed from the nonphysician work pool, though<br />

the impact is cut nearly in half when the "bottom-up"<br />

approach is used for the direct costs. This impact is in<br />

large part driven by the decrease in the PE RVUs for<br />

audiology CPT codes 92557, 92567 and 92588, which we believe<br />

may now be more appropriately priced in our proposal than<br />

they were in the nonphysician work pool that uses historic<br />

charge-based RVUs to determine the direct practice expense<br />

for a service. However, we would welcome discussions with<br />

audiologists regarding this impact, so that we can ensure<br />

that the relative costs are reflected appropriately.<br />

Despite submitting a supplementary survey that showed<br />

higher PE costs per hour, cardiology is shown to have an<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> -2.1 percent in the last column <strong>of</strong> Table 30. This<br />

is largely due to the decrease in direct PE for several<br />

high-volume services resulting from the adoption <strong>of</strong> the<br />

“bottom up” approach. For example, the RVUs for the<br />

complete electrocardiogram service, CPT code 93000, decline<br />

by 43 percent. The RVUs for multiple 3-D heart imaging, CPT<br />

Code 78465, decline by 32 percent. However, it should be<br />

noted that, if the new survey data had not been used to<br />

calculate indirect PE, cardiology would have had a<br />

significantly larger (11 percent) negative impact.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!