19.02.2013 Views

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

321<br />

for a new code may change because we did not initially have<br />

Medicare utilization data to determine the specialty mix for the<br />

service. In these cases, we either assigned the code to a<br />

particular specialty’s practice expense pool based on the<br />

specialty most likely to provide the service, or we used the “all<br />

physician” practice expense pool to determine the code’s practice<br />

expense RVUs. While we try to minimize instability in the<br />

practice expense RVUs for new services by assigning the specialty<br />

that is most likely to perform the service until such time as we<br />

have actual utilization data, the addition <strong>of</strong> actual utilization<br />

data may still result in some change to the practice expense RVUs<br />

during the first few years a code is in existence.<br />

The estimated payment impacts reflect the averages for each<br />

specialty based on Medicare utilization. To the extent that<br />

there are year-to-year changes in the volume and mix <strong>of</strong> services<br />

provided by a specialty, the actual impact on total Medicare<br />

revenues may be different than those shown here. Also, the<br />

payment impact for an individual physician may be different from<br />

the specialty average impact, based on the mix <strong>of</strong> services the<br />

physician provides. Because physicians, practitioners and<br />

suppliers, furnish services to both Medicare and non-Medicare<br />

patients and they may receive substantial Medicare revenues for<br />

services that are not paid under the PFS, the average change in<br />

total revenues for any specialty, practitioner or supplier, would<br />

be less than the impacts displayed here. For instance,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!